切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 501 -507. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.04.011

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

医护技一体化加速康复模式促进前交叉韧带重建术后早期功能康复
李静1, 周凯1, 李鹏程1,(), 刘莉1, 李沭1, 李箭1   
  1. 1. 611130 成都,四川大学华西医院
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-24 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 李鹏程
  • 基金资助:
    四川大学华西医院学科卓越发展1.3.5工程项目(ZY2016204)

Integrated enhanced rehabilitation model promotes early functional rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Jing Li1, Kai Zhou1, Pengcheng Li1,(), Li Liu1, Shu Li1, Jian Li1   

  1. 1. West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 611130, China
  • Received:2017-08-24 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Pengcheng Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Pengcheng, Email:
引用本文:

李静, 周凯, 李鹏程, 刘莉, 李沭, 李箭. 医护技一体化加速康复模式促进前交叉韧带重建术后早期功能康复[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 501-507.

Jing Li, Kai Zhou, Pengcheng Li, Li Liu, Shu Li, Jian Li. Integrated enhanced rehabilitation model promotes early functional rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 501-507.

目的

探讨医护技一体化加速康复综合管理模式对膝关节前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后患者康复影响的安全性及有效性。

方法

2014年9月到2015年6月期间因外伤导致急性ACL损伤在四川大学华西医院运动医学科就诊,经关节镜检确认需行ACL重建手术的120例患者被纳入本研究。膝关节多发韧带损伤、合并骨性损伤、慢性ACL损伤等情况不予纳入。患者被随机分为实验组(60人)和对照组(60人)。实验组采用一体化加速康复措施,对照组采用传统围手术期管理模式。比较两组患者一般情况,术前术后膝关节活动度(ROM)及Lysholm评分,ROM恢复到90°及120°所需时间,SF-36生存质量评分。随访至术后12个月。计量资料采用(±s)表示,组间比较采用t检验,计数资料采用率表示,两组比较采用χ2检验或Fisher检验。

结果

共111例患者完成随访,实验组54例,对照组57例。两组患者在年龄、性别比例、身体质量指数BMI、术前Lysholm评分等方面差异无统计学意义。实验组并发症发生更少(14.8% vs 27.3%,χ2=8.33,P<0.01)。与对照组相比,术后2周、1月及3月实验组膝关节ROM更大[(73±17)° vs (51±23)°,t=5.64,P<0.01;(94±23)° vs (78±25)°,t=3.51,P<0.01;(130±18)° vs (118±21)°,t=3.23,P<0.01]、Lysholm评分更高(t=3.29,P<0.01;t=2.69,P=0.01;t=5.23,P<0.01)。实验组膝关节ROM达到90°及120°所需时间均短于对照组[90°,(23±4)d vs (35±4)d,t=15.53,P<0.01;120°,(37±15)d vs (54±13)d,t=6.16,P<0.01]。术后3月,实验组SF-36各项评分均高于对照组(PF,t=3.55,P<0.01;RP, t=5.88,P<0.01;BP,t=2.86,P=0.01;GH,t=2.07,P=0.04;VT,t=2.86,P<0.01;SF,t=2.69,P<0.01;RE,t=2.29,P=0.02;MH,t=2.42,P=0.01)。

结论

医护技一体化加速康复模式能够加快ACL损伤患者的术后早期功能康复,减少术后并发症发生,缩短住院时间,提高患者早期生存质量。

Objective

To explore the safety and efficacy of comprehensive management model of enhanced rehabilitation for patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after knee injury.

Methods

From September 2014 to June 2015 120 patients with acute ACL injury due to trauma in sports medicine clinic of West China Hospital of Sichuan University, who were confirmed by arthroscopy and needed ACL reconstruction were included in this study. The patients who combined with multiple knee ligament injuries, bone injury, or chronic ACL injury were excluded. The patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (60 pateints) and the control group (60 patients). The experimental group were treated with the combination steps of enhanced rehabilitation. The control group took the traditional perioperative management model. The general conditions, the preoperative and postoperative knee range of motion (ROM) and Lysholm score, the rehabilitation time for ROM of 90 ° and 120 °, short form-36 (SF-36) quality of life score were all compared between the two groups. These patients were followed up to 12 months after the surgery. The measurement data were expressed as (±s), and t-test was used for comparison between groups. The count data were expressed as ratio, and the two groups were compared using χ2 test or Fisher test.

Results

A total of 111 patients were followed up, 54 in the experimental group and 57 in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in age, sex ratio, body mass index (BMI), or preoperative Lysholm score. Compared with the control group, the experimental group showed the fewer complications (14.8% vs 27.3%, χ2=8.33, P<0.01); better ROM [(73±17)° vs. (51±23)°, t=5.64, P<0.01; (94±23)° vs. (78±25)°, t=3.51, P<0.01; (130±18)° vs. (118±21)°, t=3.23, P<0.01] and higher Lysholm score (t=3.29, P<0.01; t=2.69, P=0.01; t=5.23, P<0.01) in two weeks, one month and three months postoperatively. The time required for the knee ROM reaching 90 ° and 120 ° was shorter in the experimental group than that in the control group [90°, (23±4) vs (35±4), t=15.53, P<0.01; 120°, (37±15) vs (54±13), t=6.16, P<0.01]. The levels of SF-36 in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (PF, t=3.55, P<0.01; RP, t=5.88, P<0.01; BP, t=2.86, P=0.01; GH, t=2.07, P=0.04; VT, t=2.86, P<0.01; SF, t=2.69, P<0.01; RE, t=2.29, P=0.02; MH, t=2.42, P=0.01).

Conclusion

The comprehensive management model of enhanced rehabilitation technology could accelerate the early postoperative functional rehabilitation, reduce postoperative complications, shorten the length of stay and improve the quality of life in the acute ACL injure patients.

表1 两组患者一般情况对比
图1 术后两组膝关节活动度达到90°及120°所需时间
表2 术后早期临床功能比较(±s)
图2 SF-36健康量表各项评分比较图。#表示差异有统计学意义;图A 为不同时间点两组患者PF(生理机能)评分(t=3.55,P<0.01);图B 为不同时间点两组患者RP(生理职能)评分(t=5.88,P<0.01);图C 为不同时间点两组患者BP(躯体疼痛)评分(t=2.46,P<0.05);图D 为不同时间点两组患者GH(一般健康状况)评分(t=2.07,P<0.05);图E 为不同时间点两组患者VT(精力)评分情况(t=2.86,P<0.01);图F 为不同时间点两组患者SF(社会功能)评分情况(t=2.69,P<0.01);图G 为不同时间点两组患者RE(情感职能)评分(t=2.29,P<0.05);图H 为不同时间点两组患者精神健康(MH)评分(t=2.42,P<0.05)
[1]
Grindem H, Snydermackler L, Moksnes H, et al. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2016, 50(13):804-808.
[2]
吴波,梁晓松,孙磊.前交叉韧带损伤修复的研究现状[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(4):541-543.
[3]
蔡道章.膝关节前交叉韧带损伤治疗的历史变革与发展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(1):1-2.
[4]
聂萍,周艳蓉,陈叶玲,等.个性化运动处方在前交叉韧带重建术后护理中的应用[J].护理学杂志,2013,28(4):78-80.
[5]
Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome[J]. Am J Surg, 2002, 183(6):630-641.
[6]
Juisu DC, Yuan KS, Weng SF, et al. Can early rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty reduce its major complications and medical expenses? Report from a nationally representative cohort[J]. BioMed Res Int, 2015(1):1-7.
[7]
Van Egmond JC, Verburg H, Mathijssen NM. The first 6 weeks of recovery after total knee arthroplasty with fast track: A diary study of 30 patients[J]. Acta Orthop, 2015, 86(6):708-713.
[8]
杨兴兰,崔琳.医护一体化教育在关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2017,23(6):10-12.
[9]
韩国一,李飞.快速康复方案在前交叉韧带损伤重建术后军人中的应用[J].泰山医学院学报,2017,38(6):631-633.
[10]
吴茜,陈静娟,沈蓉蓉,等.多学科合作快速康复外科模式中护理的作用[J].中国护理管理,2014,14(2):215-218.
[11]
毕海勇,孙秀江,慕宏杰,等.保留并牵张缝合Rigidfix固定胫骨残迹的前交叉韧带重建[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(1):25-29.
[12]
刘日,董江涛,王欣,等.内侧副韧带Ⅱ度损伤保守或手术修复对前交叉韧带重建后膝关节前后稳定性的影响[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(6):785-789
[13]
石辉,孟涛,尚义美,等.快速康复外科在膝关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术中的应用研究[J].中国综合临床,2015,31(11):1024-1029.
[14]
Jensen C, Roos EM, Kjærsgaard-Andersen P, et al. The effect of education and supervised exercise vs. education alone on the time to total hip replacement in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis. A randomized clinical trial protocol[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2013, 14(1):21-30.
[15]
Rooks DS, Huang J, Bierbaum BE, et al. Effect of preoperative exercise on measures of functional status in men and women undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2006, 55(5):700-708.
[16]
Gill SD, McBurney H. Does exercise reduce pain and improve physical function before hip or knee replacement surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehab, 2013, 94(1):164-176.
[17]
Hu S, Zhang ZY, Hua YQ, et al. A comparison of regional and general anaesthesia for total replacement of the hip or knee: a meta-analysis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2009, 91(7):935-942.
[18]
Smith MD, Mccall J, Plank L, et al. Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014, 1(8):CD009161.
[19]
Boldt J. Fluid management of patients undergoing abdominal surgery--more questions than answers[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2006, 23(8):631-640.
[20]
Quinn M, Bowe A, Galvin R, et al. The use of postoperative suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review[J]. Int Orthop, 2015, 39(4):653-658.
[21]
Griesdale DG, Neufeld J, Dhillon D, et al. Risk factors for urinary retention after hip or knee replacement: a cohort study[J]. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth, 2011, 58(12):1097-1104.
[1] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 豆艺璇, 黄怀, 钱绮雯, 邢然然, 林丽, 白建芳. 低强度吸气肌训练对机械通气患者肺康复的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 370-375.
[4] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[5] 郑华蓉, 刘俊, 郑艳, 陈玉莲, 廖子敏. 加速康复外科理念下的集束化护理模式在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 643-646.
[6] 代芬, 卞士柱. 无创机械通气联合肺康复在肺动脉高压呼吸衰竭治疗中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 560-562.
[7] 吕瑶, 张婵, 陈建华, 张鸣青. 压力控制容量保证通气模式在腹腔镜肝细胞癌切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 528-533.
[8] 周杰, 陈倩茵, 张静琳. 视觉重塑在视觉损伤中的原理及应用进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 221-225.
[9] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
[10] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[11] 邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
[12] 李美娜, 宋艳丽, 杨姗姗, 李聚彩, 罗慧利, 吕杰. 三联预康复策略在退行性脊柱侧弯患者围术期的应用效果[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 356-364.
[13] 许方军, 曹晓光, 王修敏, 董学超, 刘云卫, 彭云飞, 周康. 虚拟情景互动技术联合肩胛骨运动控制强化训练对偏瘫患者上肢功能及日常生活活动能力的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 222-228.
[14] 赵军, 李超杰, 李佳. 雷贝拉唑联合康复新液对治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 254-258.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要