切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 332 -337. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.03.006

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

富血小板血浆联合关节镜清理治疗膝关节骨关节炎的临床研究
黄山东1,(), 费志军1, 赵晓亮1, 辛鹏1, 徐凯1, 谢宁灵1, 林淮1, 王维1   
  1. 1. 510510 广州,解放军广州总医院一五七分院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-18 出版日期:2018-06-01
  • 通信作者: 黄山东

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma combined with arthroscopic debridement for treatment of knee osteoarthritis

Shandong Huang1,(), Zhijun Fei1, Xiaoliang Zhao1, Peng Xin1, Kai Xu1, Ningling Xie1, Huai Lin1, Wei Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, 157 Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Guangzhou 510510, China
  • Received:2017-12-18 Published:2018-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Shandong Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Shandong, Email:
引用本文:

黄山东, 费志军, 赵晓亮, 辛鹏, 徐凯, 谢宁灵, 林淮, 王维. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜清理治疗膝关节骨关节炎的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 332-337.

Shandong Huang, Zhijun Fei, Xiaoliang Zhao, Peng Xin, Kai Xu, Ningling Xie, Huai Lin, Wei Wang. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma combined with arthroscopic debridement for treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 332-337.

目的

观察富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗术联合关节镜清理术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的临床疗效。

方法

2013年12月至2015年5月,解放军广州总医院一五七分院骨科收治25例Kellgren & Lawrence(K-L)2、3级,疼痛评分≥5分,保守治疗3个月以上无效的膝骨关节炎患者,分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组12例,先行关节镜清理术,根据关节镜观察结果分别行滑膜清理、软骨成形、髁间棘骨赘清理和半月板成形等,然后关节腔内注射5 ml PRP,4周后进行第2次PRP注射;对照组13例,单纯行关节镜清理术治疗。比较治疗前、治疗后半年、1年、2年的数字疼痛强度评分(NRS疼痛评分)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数评分(WOMAC评分)、特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS评分)和SF-36生活质量评分。采用SPSS 17.0统计软件进行统计分析。治疗组和对照组间数值(符合正态分布且方差齐性的评价指标)比较采用t检验,同一评价指标的不同时间点的对比采用重复测量资料方差分析;定性资料采用卡方检验。

结果

治疗组患者治疗后半年、1年、2年的NRS疼痛评分、WOMAC评分、HSS膝关节评分、SF-36生活质量评分结果均比对照组的评分结果更佳。治疗后半年,治疗组NRS疼痛评分由治疗前的(7.1±1.0)分下降至(1.3±0.6)分(t=13.415,P<0.01),WOMAC评分由治疗前的(74.4± 11.1)分下降至(19.2±4.1)分(t=17.994,P<0.01),HSS评分由治疗前的(33.2±6.0)分提高至(79.2±8.1)分(t=-14.175,P<0.01),SF-36生活质量评分由治疗前的(63.2±12.0)分提高到(109.8±10.5)分(t=-44.557,P<0.01),与治疗前比较均有统计学意义;治疗后1年的全部4项评分及治疗后2年的NRS疼痛评分和HSS评分均与治疗后半年时的评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后2年的WOMAC评分和SF-36生活质量评分分别为(21.7±2.7)分(t=15.517,P<0.01)及(98.6±8.7)分(t=-10.454,P<0.01),与治疗前比较仍效果显著且差异有统计学意义。对照组治疗半年后NRS疼痛评分由治疗前的(6.8±0.9)分下降至(2.8±1.3)分(t=18.623,P<0.01),WOMAC评分由治疗前的(73.7±8.3)分下降至(32.5±4.5)分(t=25.059,P<0.01),HSS评分由治疗前的(34.0±9.1)分提高至(63.8±10.4)分(t=-18.553,P<0.01),SF-36生活质量评分由治疗前的(62.2±7.2)分提高到(85.6±4.3)分(t=-13.632,P<0.01);治疗后1年的HSS评分为(39.8±8.8)分,仍比治疗前高且有统计学意义(t=-2.448,P<0.05);治疗后2年的HSS评分为(29.8±7.7)分,比治疗前低且有统计学意义(t=1.732,P<0.01);治疗后1年及2年的其他评分结果与治疗前比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

本研究结果表明,两种方法均可缓解K-L 2、3级膝关节骨关节炎患者的疼痛、改善功能和生活质量;关节镜清理术的治疗效果仅能维持半年,PRP治疗术联合关节镜清理术的效果优于单纯关节镜清理术,且效果更持久。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in combination with arthroscopic debridement for moderate knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

A total of 25 patients with grade two or grade three knee osteoarthritis according to K-L classification, numerical rating scal (NRS) over five, failed treatment with non-operative methods for more than three months were allocated in the treatment group(n=12) or the control group(n=13). In the treatment group, two times of 5 ml of PRP intra-articular injection were performed with four weeks interval. The first time of PRP intra-articular injection was performed during arthroscopy after arthroscopic debridement. In the control group, the patients were only treated with knee arthroscopic debridement. The outcomes were assessed with NRS, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores, the short form-36 questionnaire of health survey (SF-36) scores at baseline and six months, one year and two years after treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 17.0. Data of Gaussian distribution were analyzed by ttest (data between treatment and control groups) or analysis of variance (data within group). Categorized data were analyzed using the Chi-square test.

Results

The scores of NRS and WOMAC of the treatment group at six months, one year and two years after treatment were lower than the control group; the scores of HSS and SF-36 of the treatment group were higher than the control group. In the treatment group, the scores of NRS and WOMAC at six months after treatment decreased from (7.1±1.0), (74.4±11.1) at baseline to (1.3±0.6)(t=13.415, P<0.01), (19.2±4.1)(t=17.994, P<0.01) respectively; the scores of HSS and SF-36 increased from (33.2±6.0), (63.2±12.0) at baseline to (79.2±8.1)( t=-14.175, P<0.01) and (109.8±10.5)(t=-44.557, P<0.01)respectively. The four scores at one year and the scores of NRS and HSS at two years had no statistically significant difference compared to the scores at six months (P>0.05), while the scores of WOMAC and SF-36 at two years after treatment were (21.7±2.7)(t=15.517, P<0.01) and (98.6±8.7)(t=-10.454, P<0.01) respectively, which were worse than the scores at six months, but still better than the scores at baseline (P<0.05). In the control group, the scores of NRS and WOMAC decreased from (6.8±0.9), (73.7±8.3) at baseline to (2.8±1.3) (t=18.623, P<0.01), (32.5±4.5)(t=25.059, P<0.01) at six months after treatment respectively. The scores of HSS and SF-36 increased from (34.0±9.1), (62.2±7.2) at baseline to (63.8±10.4) (t=-18.553, P<0.05), (85.6±4.3)( t=-13.632, P<0.05) at six months after treatment respectively. The scores of HSS at one year decreased to (39.8±8.8) compared to six months (P<0.05), but still higher than the scores at baseline (t=-2.448, P<0.05). The scores of HSS at two years decreased to (29.8±7.7), lower than the scores at baseline (t=1.732, P<0.05). The scores of NRS, WOMAC and SF-36 at one and two years had no significant difference statistically compared to the scores at baseline (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Both the PRP and arthroscopic debridement could reduce pain, restore knee function and improve the life quality of patients with knee osteoarthritis of K-L grade two and three. The PRP combined with arthroscopic debridement may have better and long-term effects of pain reduction, knee function restoration and life quality improvement within two years compared to arthroscopic debridement alone. The effects of the arthroscopic debridement could maintain for only six months.

表1 两组患者治疗前基本资料比较
表2 两组患者治疗前观察指标比较(±s)
表3 两组患者治疗后观察指标比较(±s)
表4 治疗组治疗前后观察指标比较的统计学结果(n=12 )
表5 对照组治疗前后观察指标比较的统计学结果(n=13 )
[1]
薛庆云,王坤正,裴福兴,等.中国40岁以上人群原发性骨关节炎患病状况调查[J].中华骨科杂志,2015,35(12):1206-1212.
[2]
Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, et al. Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce[J]. JAMA, 2003, 290(18):2443-2454.
[3]
Rönn K, Reischl N, Gautier E, et al. Current surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J]. Arthritis, 2011:454873. doi: 10.1155/2011/454873.
[4]
Hutt JR, Craik J, Phadnis J, et al. Arthroscopy for mechanical symptoms in osteoarthritis: a cost-effective procedure[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015, 23(12):3545-3549.
[5]
中华医学会骨科学分会(邱贵兴).骨关节炎诊治指南(2007年版)[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(10):793-796.
[6]
Xie X, Zhang C, Tuan RS. Biology of platelet-rich plasma and its clinical application in cartilage repair[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2014, 16(1):204-210.
[7]
谢雪涛,沈龙祥,陈圣宝,等.关节内注射富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的Meta分析[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2016,10(6):636-644.
[8]
黄山东,费志军,赵晓亮,等.富血小板血浆治疗儿童股骨头缺血性坏死1例初步报道[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2014,8(3):400-401.
[9]
Kavadar G, Demircioglu DT, Celik MY, et al. Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of moderate knee osteoarthritis: a randomized prospective study[J]. J Phy Ther Sci, 2015, 27(12):3863-3867.
[10]
Raeissadat SA, Rayegani SM, Hassanabadi H, et al. Knee OA injection choices:PRP versus HA(a one-year andomized clinical trial)[J]. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord, 2015, 8(1):1-8.
[11]
Spahn G, Klinger HM, Hofmann GO. The effect of arthroscopic debridement and conservative treatment in knee osteoarthritis: Results of a 5-year follow-up and literature review[J]. Sportverletz Sportschaden, 2013, 27(4):226-231.
[12]
Figueroa D, Calvo R, Villalon IE, et al. Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J]. Knee, 2013, 20(6):591-594.
[13]
Marmotti A, Rossi R, Castoldi F, et al. PRP and articular cartilage: a clinical update[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015:542502. doi: 10.1155/2015/542502
[14]
Metcalf KB, Mandelbaum BR, Mcilwraith CW. Application of platelet-rich plasma to disorders of the knee joint[J]. Cartilage, 2013, 4(4):295-312.
[15]
Andia I, Maffulli N. Platelet-rich plasma for managing pain and inflammation in osteoarthritis[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2013, 9(12):721-730.
[16]
Lana F, Weglein A, Sampson SE, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing hyaluronic acid,platelet-rich plasma and the combination of both in the treatment of mild and moderate osteoarthritis of the knee[J]. J Stem Cells Regen Med, 2016, 12(2):69-78.
[17]
Duif C, Vogel T, Topcuoglu F, et al. Does intraoperative application of leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma during arthroscopy for knee degeneration affect postoperative pain, function and quality of life? A 12-month randomized controlled double-blind trial[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(7):971–977.
[1] 许银峰, 盛璞义, 余世明, 张阳春. 偏心性髋臼旋转截骨术治疗发育性髋关节发育不良[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 568-574.
[2] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[3] 刘鹏, 罗天, 许珂媛, 邓红美, 李瑄, 唐翠萍. 八段锦对膝关节炎疗效的初步步态分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 590-595.
[4] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[5] 王相迎, 杨长生, 曲铁兵. 固定平台单髁置换假体合适位置的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 638-645.
[6] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[7] 谢佳乐, 李琦, 芦升升, 姜劲松. 内侧膝骨关节炎伴胫股关节冠状半脱位的手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 653-657.
[8] 李亚龙, 王星童, 申传安. 异体富血小板血浆在创面修复中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 541-545.
[9] 王振宇, 张洪美, 荆琳, 何名江, 闫奇. 膝骨关节炎相关炎症因子与血浆代谢物间的因果关系及中介效应[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 467-473.
[10] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[11] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[12] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[13] 宋庆成, 郑占乐, 王天瑞, 王宇钏, 张凯旋, 纳静, 蔚佳昊, 杨思繁, 宋九宏, 张英泽. “人老膝不老”:膝关节健康管理的全方位探索与实践[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 321-324.
[14] 郑占乐, 王宇钏, 蔚佳昊, 宋庆成, 张凯旋, 纳静, 王天瑞, 宋九宏, 张英泽, 王娟. 保膝须“开膝”——“开膝”在膝骨关节炎中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 325-330.
[15] 高广涵, 张耀南, 石磊, 王林, 王飞, 郑子天, 王鸿禹, 郭民政, 薛庆云. 膝骨关节炎患者前交叉韧带功能影像学影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 301-307.
阅读次数
全文


摘要