Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02): 163-167. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.02.004

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Treatment of infection after hip arthroplasty by spacer-free two-stage revision

Hangfan Zong1, Ruiyu Liu2,(), Kunzheng Wang2, Mufan Li2, Jialin Liang2, Chuanyi Bai2, Xiaoqian Dang2   

  1. 1. Department No.1 of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an 710000, China; Department of Anatomy, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an 710000, China
    2. Department No.1 of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an 710000, China
  • Received:2017-04-04 Online:2018-04-01 Published:2018-04-01
  • Contact: Ruiyu Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Ruiyu, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of peri-prosthetic infection treatment of two-stage exchange without the use of the spacers.

Methods

Twenty-one patients with hip peri-prosthetic infection following hip replacement, who underwent the spacer-free two-stage revision in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University from August 2009 to December 2017, were analyzed. These patients included six males and 15 females, aged from 28 to 76 years. In the first stage, these patients were treated by surgical removal of all components without spacers. When the clinical evaluation and serum inflammatory markers suggested the infection had been resolved, the second stage of debridement and new prosthesis replacement was performed. The effects were evaluated with Harris hip score and limb shortening via paired t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results

All the patients were followed up for (4.0±2.8)years on average. The hip Harris score(86.4±4.4) at the last follow-up was significantly higher than the score(48.4±4.9) before two-stage revision(t=25.509, P<0.01). The preoperative length of the affected limb was 4.3(3.85, 4.90) cm shorter than that of the healthy side, while it was 0.1cm(-0.2, 0.35) cm (negative value represented the increased length of the affected side compared with the healthy side) after the two-stage revision, and the difference was significant(Z=-4.016, P<0.01). One patient was infected after the operation.

Conclusion

Two-stagerevision without spacer has a high infection control rate in the treatment of periprosthetic hip infection, and does not result in significant shortening of the limb due to peripheral tissue contracture of the hip; the patients could get better hip function.

Key words: Prosthesis-related infections, Arthroplasty, replacement, hip

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-83189181,020-83062381 E-mail: cjojs1@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd