切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 215 -221. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2026.02.010

基础论著

头低脚高位无会阴柱牵引技术的力学研究
王耀霆, 王明新, 王龙, 康晓琪, 李春宝()   
  1. 100048 北京,解放军总医院第四医学中心骨科医学部运动医学科
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-20 出版日期:2026-04-01
  • 通信作者: 李春宝
  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学资金-海淀原始创新联合基金资助项目(L252061)

Mechanical study on perineal post-free traction technique in Trendelenburg position

Yaoting Wang, Mingxin Wang, Long Wang, Xiaoqi Kang, Chunbao Li()   

  1. Department of Sports Medicine, Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2026-01-20 Published:2026-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Chunbao Li
引用本文:

王耀霆, 王明新, 王龙, 康晓琪, 李春宝. 头低脚高位无会阴柱牵引技术的力学研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 215-221.

Yaoting Wang, Mingxin Wang, Long Wang, Xiaoqi Kang, Chunbao Li. Mechanical study on perineal post-free traction technique in Trendelenburg position[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 215-221.

目的

构建皮肤与手术巾摩擦力学模型,验证头低脚高位无会阴柱牵引技术的力学可行性,明确不同患者体重适应性与安全角度分析,为临床应用提供力学依据。

方法

(1)离体实验:以新鲜猪皮模拟人体皮肤,采用摩擦系数仪测定40、80 mmHg压力下猪皮与手术巾的摩擦系数,每组5块猪皮,每块重复测量3次。(2)在体实验:纳入30例拟采用无会阴柱牵引技术行髋关节镜手术、自愿签署知情同意书等符合纳入标准的患者,排除既往髋部手术病史的患者,测量髋关节牵开10 mm时的实际牵引力和头低脚高角度,推导皮肤与手术巾的摩擦系数,对比离体与在体数据的一致性。(3)分组分析:将患者按体重分为轻体重组(体重<60 kg)、中体重组(60~79 kg)、高体重组(体重≥80 kg),分析各组摩擦系数和角度的趋势。数据的组间比较采用单因素方差分析或独立样本t检验。

结果

(1)离体实验:40、80 mmHg压力下猪皮与手术巾平均摩擦系数分别为0.371、0.433,猪皮与手术巾间的摩擦系数随压力升高呈正相关(t=-4.35,P<0.001)。(2)在体实验:纳入30例患者,男性23例、女性7例,年龄16~66岁,平均(35±13)岁;体重48~100 kg,平均(72±13)kg;牵引力范围44.30~87.70 kg,平均(59.4±11.3)kg;头低脚高角度范围5.3°~14.3°,平均(9.9±2.8)°;摩擦系数范围0.43~1.18,平均0.70±0.22。(3)轻、中、高体重患者使用无会阴柱牵引技术适用的头低脚高度数分别为10°、13°和15°。

结论

头低脚高10°~15°体位下,皮肤与手术巾的摩擦力可对抗下肢牵引力,确保髋关节间隙安全牵开;不同体重患者采用该技术时,需以最小角度减少并发症,且体重越小所需角度越大;本结果可为相关骨科手术体位提供参考。

Objective

To establish a mechanical friction model between human skin and surgical drapes, verify the mechanical feasibility of the perineal-post-free traction technique in the Trendelenburg position, clarify its adaptability to patients with different body weights and analyze the safe angles, so as to provide a mechanical basis for clinical application.

Methods

(1) In vitro experiment: fresh porcine skin was used to simulate human skin. A friction coefficient tester was employed to measure the friction coefficient between porcine skin and surgical drapes under pressures of 40 mmHg and 80 mmHg, with five porcine skin specimens per group and three repeated measurements for each specimen. (2) In vivo experiment: 30 patients scheduled for hip arthroscopy using the perineal-post-free traction technique who voluntarily signed informed consent forms and met the inclusion were enrolled. The patients with history of previous hip surgery were excluded. The actual traction force and Trendelenburg angle at 10 mm of hip joint distraction were measured, the friction coefficient between skin and surgical drapes was calculated, and the consistency between in vitro and in vivo data was compared. (3) Group analysis: Patients were divided into a low-weight group (<60 kg), a medium-weight group (60–79 kg), and a high-weight group (≥80 kg). The trends of friction coefficient and angle in each group were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 software. One-way analysis of variance or independent-samples t test was used for intergroup comparisons, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

(1) In vitro experiment: The mean friction coefficients between porcine skin and surgical drapes under 40 mmHg and 80 mmHg were 0.371 and 0.433, respectively. The friction coefficient was positively correlated with increasing pressure (t=-3.1165, P=0.0143). (2) In vivo experiment: Thirty patients were included, consisting of 23 males and seven females. Age were from 16 to 66 years, (35±13) years on average; body weight were from 48 to 100 kg, (72±13) kg on average . The traction force ranged from 44.30 to 87.70 kg, (59.4±11.3) kg on average, the Trendelenburg angle ranged from 5.3° to 14.3°, ( 9.9±2.8)°on average, and the friction coefficient ranged from 0.43 to 1.18, 0.70±0.22 on average. (3) The applicable Trendelenburg angles for patients with low, medium, and high body weights using the perineal-post-free traction technique are 10°, 13°, and 15°, respectively.

Conclusions

At a Trendelenburg angle of 10° to 15°, the frictional force between skin and surgical drapes can counteract the lower-extremity traction force and ensure safe distraction of the hip joint space. For patients of different body weights, the minimum safe angle should be used to reduce complications, and a smaller body weight requires a larger angle. The findings provide important references for positioning in related orthopedic surgeries.

图1 固定测试猪皮。图A为裁剪好的手术巾平铺在摩擦系数测量仪滑动模块上,避免出现褶皱;图B为装好试样的滑块放置在猪皮上,安装砝码调整接触压力
Figure 1 Hogskin sample positioning for test. A shows that the cut surgical drape flat was laid on the sliding module of the friction coefficient measuring instrument without wrinkles; B shows that the sample-loaded slider was placed on the porcine skin and weights were installed to adjust the contact pressure
图2 测量头低脚高角度。图A为将水平角度测量仪安置于手术床侧方;图B为调整手术床为头低脚高体位
Figure 2 Measurement of Trendelenburg position angle. A shows placing the horizontal angle measuring instrument on the side of the operating table; B shows adjustment of the operating table for the Trendelenburg position
图3 体位摆放。图A为对侧腹股沟区用加厚约束带斜跨腹股沟后固定于手术床,约束带环绕患者胸腹联合部;图B为术中体位侧面观察
Figure 3 Patient positioning. A shows that the contralateral inguinal region is secured to the operating table with an enhanced restraint strap placed obliquely across the groin, with the restraint strap encircling the patient’s thoraco-abdominal junction; B is intraoperative lateral view of patient positioning
图4 不同压力组及30例患者组的摩擦系数对比图 注:单因素方差分析:F=8.778,P<0.001,猪皮组与30例患者组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)
Figure 4 Comparison of friction coefficients among the groups of different pressures and 30-patient group Note: One-way ANOVA: F=8.778, P< 0.001, The difference between the porcine skin group and the 30-patient group was statistically significant
图5 纳入患者性别、年龄、体重分组分布图
Figure 5 Distribution chart of gender, age and weight in the enrolled patients
图6 性别分组摩擦系数对比图 注:女性组摩擦系数显著高于男性组(t=8.976,P<0.0001)
Figure 6 Comparison of friction coefficients between gender groups Note: the friction coefficient in the female group was significantly higher than that in the male group (t=8.976, P<0.0001)
图7 不同年龄分组摩擦系数对比图 注:摩擦系数随年龄增长呈显著上升趋势(F=11.56,P=0.001)
Figure 7 Comparison chart of friction coefficients among different age groups Note: the friction coefficient increased significantly with age (F=11.56, P=0.001)
图8 不同体重分组摩擦系数对比图 注:摩擦系数随体重增加呈下降趋势(F=9.55,P<0.001)
Figure 8 Comparison chart of friction coefficients among different weight groups Note: the friction coefficient decreased with body weight increasing (F=9.55, P<0.001)
[1]
Nwachukwu BU, McFeely ED, Nasreddine AY, et al. Complications of hip arthroscopy in children and adolescents[J]. J Pediatr Orthop, 2011, 31(3): 227-231.
[2]
Salas AP, Mazek J, Araujo-Reyes D, et al. The Tutankhamun technique in hip arthroscopy[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2018, 7(11): e1167-e1171.
[3]
Wang Y, Yu H, Wang L, et al. Postless distraction technique with no additional equipment in hip arthroscopy[J/OL]. Arthrosc Tech, 2024, 13(6): 102963. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.102963.
[4]
Kollmorgen RC, Ellis T, Lewis BD, et al. Achieving post-free distraction in hip arthroscopy with a pink pad patient positioning device using standard hip distraction tables[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2019, 8(4): e363-e368.
[5]
Perry AK, Gursoy S, Singh H, et al. The pink pad: a method of post-free distraction during hip arthroscopy[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2021, 10(8): e1897-e1902.
[6]
Salas AP, Mendez-Perez E, Mazek J, et al. The yoga mat technique in postless hip arthroscopy[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2021, 10(6): e1525-e1530.
[7]
李勇, 李春宝, 孙景东, 等. 无会阴柱牵引下髋关节镜手术治疗股骨髋臼撞击征的短期疗效分析[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2024, 17(5): 410-415.
[8]
Parkes CW, Featherall J, McGrale CT, et al. Association of postless distraction in hip arthroscopy with decreased postoperative Groin numbness[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2023, 51(13): 3447-3453.
[9]
O’Neill DC, Featherall J, Dowdle SB, et al. Postless hip distraction systems decrease the amount of traction force needed to obtain adequate hip distraction versus a conventional post hip distractor[J]. Arthroscopy, 2023, 39(3): 740-747.
[10]
Kraeutler MJ, Marder RS, Fasulo SM, et al. Patients undergoing postless hip arthroscopy demonstrate significantly better patient-reported outcomes and clinically significant outcomes compared to conventional post-assisted hip arthroscopy at short-term follow-up[J]. Arthroscopy, 2025, 41(3): 649-656.
[11]
Girardi NG, Kraeutler MJ, Keeter C, et al. During postless hip arthroscopy, male patients, high body mass index, low Beighton scores, and limited range of motion require high traction force[J]. Arthroscopy, 2024, 40(4): 1136-1142.
[12]
Mei-Dan O, Kraeutler MJ, Garabekyan T, et al. Hip distraction without a perineal post: a prospective study of 1000 hip arthroscopy cases[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(3): 632-641.
[13]
王耀霆, 王明新, 王龙, 等. 髋关节镜手术中无会阴柱牵引的临床效果观察[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2022, 43(11): 1118-1122.
[14]
马继鹏, 王耀霆, 李志江, 等. Trendelenburg体位无会阴柱牵引技术对股骨髋臼撞击综合征髋关节镜手术快速康复的效果[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2025, 105(27): 2285-2290.
[15]
Lucchini A, Bambi S, Mattiussi E, et al. Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: aretrospective analysis of complications[J]. Dimens Crit Care Nurs, 2020, 39(1): 39-46.
[16]
Ciornei B, Vaduva A, Hutu I, et al. Experimenting with pig-based skin model for burns. Testing of mean literature findings[J/OL]. Chirurgia(Bucur), 2024, 119(Ahead of print): 1-10. DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.3008. PMID: 39206936.
[17]
Vilhena L, Afonso L, Ramalho A. Skin friction: mechanical and tribological characterization of different papers used in everyday life[J/OL]. Materials, 2023, 16(16): 5724. DOI: 10.3390/ma16165724.
[18]
Temel M, Johnson AA, Lloyd AB. Body mapping of skin friction coefficient and tactile perception during the dynamic skin-textile interaction[J]. Ergonomics, 2023, 66(10): 1449-1464.
[19]
Zhu YH, Song SP, Luo W, et al. Characterization of skin friction coefficient, and relationship to stratum corneum hydration in a normal Chinese population[J]. Skin Pharmacol Physiol, 2011, 24(2): 81-86.
[20]
Wininger AE, Kraeutler MJ, Goble H, et al. The physics of postless hip arthroscopy[J/OL]. Arthrosc Tech, 2024, 13(10): 103077. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103077.
[21]
Schwartz D, Magen YK, Levy A, et al. Effects of humidity on skin friction against medical textiles as related to prevention of pressure injuries[J]. Int Wound J, 2018, 15(6): 866-874.
[1] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组. 智能传感动态引导技术在骨科手术应用的专家共识(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 131-140.
[2] 段水岩, 孙文才. 3D 打印金属内植物在骨科手术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 82-87.
[3] 代永鸿, 杨匡洋, 吴征杰, 曾焰辉, 赵春鹏, 王军强, 吴新宝. 智能骨盆骨折微创复位机器人系统的早期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 795-799.
[4] 黄建, 胡安丽, 王建平. 不同手术入路的骶前囊肿切除术单中心回顾性队列研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 683-686.
[5] 陈丽茹, 唐守艳, 冯钰, 阮佳, 邓含, 颜容宇, 吴小凤. 截石位骨盆固定装置的设计及其在经会阴前列腺穿刺术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 714-719.
[6] 杨勇军, 曾一鸣, 贺显雅, 卢强, 李远伟. ASA分级≥Ⅲ级患者局麻经会阴前列腺多模态影像融合穿刺的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-447.
[7] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[8] 孔令琪, 郑相云, 朱延袤, 杨松, 潘映雪, 张焕虎. 超低位直肠癌手术治疗方式的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 373-379.
[9] 刘旭, 朱元庆, 周红兵, 应浩杰, 杨光, 孙英刚. 腹腔镜肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 37-44.
[10] 芦煜, 李振宇, 吴承东, 周仲伍. 肛周子宫内膜异位症一例报告[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 431-434.
[11] 杨浦鑫, 陈伟, 邢欣, 王忠正, 王宇钏, 程晓东, 李栋正, 张英泽, 张奇. 新式牵引治疗床在腰椎间盘突出症患者中的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 359-364.
[12] 李婧婧, 陈茜, 周惠芬, 曾禹沙, 许新意, 樊志敏, 薛雅红. 基于经会阴超声及肛管直肠测压分析女性排便梗阻综合征患者盆底形态与功能特征[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 229-234.
[13] 许新意, 岳婧婧, 高玲, 曾禹沙, 李婧婧, 冯克, 薛雅红. 经会阴超声与MRI排粪造影诊断女性出口梗阻型便秘的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 342-348.
[14] 薛雅红, 樊志敏, 高玲, 沈广澍, 岳婧婧, 姜韵琳, 王小峰. 动态经会阴超声对女性排便梗阻综合征诊断价值的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 15-20.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?