切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 131 -140. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2026.02.001

专家共识

智能传感动态引导技术在骨科手术应用的专家共识(2026版)
中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组   
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-07 出版日期:2026-04-01
  • 基金资助:
    国家杰出青年科学基金(82425036)

Expert consensus on application of intelligent sensor-based dynamic guidance technology in orthopedic surgery (2026 version)

Joint Surgery Group of the Orthopedic Society of the Chinese Medical Association   

  • Received:2026-01-07 Published:2026-04-01
引用本文:

中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组. 智能传感动态引导技术在骨科手术应用的专家共识(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 131-140.

Joint Surgery Group of the Orthopedic Society of the Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on application of intelligent sensor-based dynamic guidance technology in orthopedic surgery (2026 version)[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 131-140.

随着骨科手术加速迈向精准化、数字化与个性化,智能传感动态引导作为新兴技术,通过实时量化术中生物力学与空间位置数据,为外科决策提供客观依据,可应用于关节、脊柱、运动医学及创伤等领域。为规范该技术的临床应用,中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组基于现有临床证据与实践经验,采用改良Delphi法(五轮专家评估)制定《智能传感动态引导技术在骨科手术应用的专家共识》。本共识内容涵盖传感器动态引导技术的适应证、技术规范、有效性、安全性以及与传统方法和其他数智化技术的比较,共形成14条推荐意见,为临床操作提供切实指导,助力我国智能骨科手术普及落地。

As orthopedic surgery advances rapidly toward precision, digitization, and personalization, intelligent sensing dynamic guidance——an emerging technology, provides objective evidence for surgical judgment through real-time quantification of intra-operative biomechanical and spatial position data. It finds applications in joint surgery, spine surgery, sports medicine, and trauma management. To promote the clinical application of this technology, the Joint Surgery Group of Chinese Orthopaedic Association issued the “Expert consensus on the application of intelligent sensor-based dynamic guidance technology in orthopaedic surgery” by the modified Delphi method (five rounds of expert assessment), including on the clinical evidence and experience. This consensus includes the indications, technical characteristics, effectiveness, safety, and comparisons between this technology and traditional therapy or other digital-intelligent technologies, and 14 recommendations are elaborated. It provides practical guidance for clinical practice and facilitates further dissemination and implementation of intelligent orthopedic surgery in China.

表1 GRADE证据质量界定
[1]
Li JT, Gao X, Li X. Comparison of iASSIST navigation system with conventional techniques in total knee arthroplasty: asystematic review and meta-analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes[J]. Orthop Surg, 2019, 11(6): 985-993.
[2]
Tsuda K, Shibuya T, Okamoto N, et al. Can accuracy with the iASSIST navigation be confirmed by assessment? A multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial with independent three-dimensional image assessment[J]. Knee, 2021, 30: 344-352.
[3]
Novoa-Parra CD, Sanjuan-Cerveró R, Franco-Ferrando N, et al. Complications of computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: retrospective cohort of eight hundred and seventy eight consecutive knees[J]. Int Orthop, 2020, 44(12): 2621-2626.
[4]
Matsui Y, Fukuoka S, Masuda S, et al. Accuracy of tibial component placement in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28(12): 3733-3739.
[5]
Nan S, Cao Z, Song Y, et al. Can mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty achieve natural gap-balancing? An observational study with a novel pressure sensor[J/OL]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2022, 17(1): 407. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03255-6.
[6]
Tanino H, Nishida Y, Mitsutake R, et al. Portable accelerometer-based navigation system for cup placement of total hip arthroplasty: aprospective, randomized, controlled study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(1): 172-177.
[7]
Wells ME, Purcell RL. Accelerometer-navigated revision total knee arthroplasty: atechnique for successful gap balancing[J/OL]. Arthroplasty Today, 2024, 30: 101510. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101510.
[8]
Picardo NE, Khan W, Johnstone D. Computer-assisted navigation in high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Open Orthop J, 2012, 6(1): 305-312.
[9]
Nam D, Nawabi DH, Cross MB, et al. Accelerometer-based computer navigation for performing the distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(9): 1717-1722.
[10]
康健, 冯晓雷, 付志厚, 等. 两种导航辅助全膝关节置换的比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2023, 31(10): 876-880.
[11]
Thompson K, Griffiths-Jones W, Frendin L, et al. Interobserver agreement of sensor-derived compartmental pressure measurements in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee, 2020, 27(3): 717-722.
[12]
MacDessi SJ, Gharaibeh MA, Harris IA. How accurately can soft tissue balance be determined in total knee arthroplasty?[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2019, 34(2): 290-294.e1.
[13]
An HM, Gu W, Nan SK, et al. Sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: are there any discrepancies between robotic-assisted and manual axis orientation?[J]. J Bone Jt Surg, 2023, 105(17): 1338-1343.
[14]
Goh GS, Liow MHL, Lim WS, et al. Accelerometer-based navigation is as accurate as optical computer navigation in restoring the joint line and mechanical axis after total knee arthroplasty aprospective matched study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(1): 92-97.
[15]
Huang EH, Copp SN, Bugbee WD. Accuracy of ahandheld accelerometer-based navigation system for femoral and tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(11): 1906-1910.
[16]
Melinte MA, Simionescu L, Tăbăcar M, et al. Comparison between robotic-assisted and navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty shows comparable outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Orthop, 2025, 68: 96-104.
[17]
Kawaguchi K, Michishita K, Manabe T, et al. Comparison of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system, patient-specific instrumentation, and conventional instrumentation for femoral alignment in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2017, 29(4): 269-275.
[18]
Steinhaus ME, McLawhorn AS, Richardson SS, et al. Handheld navigation device and patient-specific cutting guides result in similar coronal alignment for primary total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective matched cohort study[J]. HSS J, 2016, 12(3): 224-234.
[19]
Rodriguez-Merchan EC. The current role of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty[J]. Arch Bone Jt Surg, 2022, 10(12): 989-991.
[20]
Spitzer E, Ruzbarsky JJ, Doyle JB, et al. A new preoperative planning technique can reduce radiation exposure during the performance of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy[J]. HSS J, 2018, 14(3): 251-257.
[21]
Stimolo D, Leggieri F, Matassi F, et al. Learning curves for high tibial osteotomy using patient-specific instrumentation: a case control study[J]. Innov Surg Sci, 2024, 9(3): 123-131.
[22]
Dasari SP, Hevesi M, Mameri E, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomies in the management of medial compartment osteoarthritis yields high accuracy and low complication rates: a systematic review[J]. J ISAKOS, 2023, 8(3): 163-176.
[23]
Xu K, Wang W, Wang Q, et al. Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in high tibial osteotomy(HTO): a meta-analysis[J]. Comput Assist Surg, 2022, 27(1): 63-73.
[24]
Wu ZP, Zhang P, Bai JZ, et al. Comparison of navigated and conventional high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthritic knees with Varus deformity: a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 55: 211-219.
[25]
Konishi T, Hamai S, Tsushima H, et al. Pre- and postoperative Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification and its impact on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Bone Joint J, 2024, 106-B(10): 1059-1066.
[26]
Arai N, Toyooka S, Masuda H, et al. Kinematic alignment achieves a more balanced total knee arthroplasty than mechanical alignment among CPAK type I patients: asimulation study[J/OL]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(12): 3596. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123596.
[27]
Tsubosaka M, Kamenaga T, Kuroda Y, et al. Accelerometer-based portable navigation system is useful for tibial bone cutting in modified kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Knee Surg, 2021, 34(8): 870-876.
[28]
Treu EA, Frandsen JJ, Woodley CD, et al. Accelerometer-based navigation in primary total knee arthroplasty leads to improved alignment but No change in patient-reported outcomes[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2023, 38(6): S222-S226.
[29]
Li J, Zhang Y, Gao X, et al. Accelerometer-based navigation vs. conventional techniques for total knee arthroplasty(TKA): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J/OL]. Arthroplasty, 2022, 4(1): 35. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-022-00135-6.
[30]
Luan Y, Wang H, Zhang M, et al. Comparison of navigation systems for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Front Surg, 2023, 10: 1112147. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1112147.
[31]
Jagadeesh N, Parameshwar A, Kumar H, et al. Accelerometer-based handheld navigation instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty decrease blood loss compared to conventional instrumentation: aprospective comparative study[J/OL]. Cureus, 2022, 14(12): e32589. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32589.
[32]
Xu X, Liu P, Yuan Z, et al. Comparison of a novel handheld accelerometer-based navigation system and conventional instrument for performing distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial[J/OL]. Ann Transl Med, 2019, 7(22): 659. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.10.55.
[33]
Shihab Z, Clayworth C, Nara N. Handheld, accelerometer-based navigation versus conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2020, 90(10): 2068-2079.
[34]
Ali SF, Gharaibeh MA, Wood JA, et al. No difference in clinical outcomes between portable navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomised trial[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2021, 91(9): 1914-1918.
[35]
张江礼, 刘金辉, 潘西庆, 等. 全膝关节置换应用智能辅助手术导航系统治疗膝骨关节炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(3): 346-351.
[36]
Lakra A, Sarpong NO, Jennings EL, et al. The learning curve by operative time for soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty using electronic sensor technology[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2019, 34(3): 483-487.
[37]
Woon CYL, Carroll KM, Lyman S, et al. Dynamic sensor-balanced knee arthroplasty: can the sensor“train”the surgeon?[J]. Arthroplast Today, 2019, 5(2): 202-210.
[38]
Sun X, Hernigou P, Zhang Q, et al. Sensor and machine learning–based assessment of gap balancing in cadaveric unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgical training[J]. Int Orthop, 2021, 45(11): 2843-2849.
[39]
MacDessi SJ, Wood JA, Diwan AD, et al. Surgeon-defined assessment is a poor predictor of knee balance in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, multicenter study[J/OL]. Knee Surg Phys Traumatol Arthrosc, 2021, 29(2): 1795. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-05925-6.
[40]
Zhao R, Liu Y, Tian H. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty using surgeon-defined assessment versus a gap-balancer or electronic sensor[J/OL]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1): 305. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02439-w.
[41]
Yang D, Zhao Y, Wang Z, et al. Soft tissue elasticity in total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo quantitative analysis[J/OL]. Clin Biomech, 2024, 120: 106335. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106335.
[42]
Vermue H, Arnout N, Tampere T, et al. Standardized intraoperative robotic laxity assessment in TKA leads to No clinically important improvements at 2 years postoperatively: arandomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2025, 483(10): 1866-1874.
[43]
Valtanen RS, Seligson M, Huddleston HG, et al. Improved clinical outcomes with dynamic, force-controlled, gap-balancing in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2024, 39(8): S218-S223.
[44]
Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Van Lauwe J, et al. A new surgical technique for medial collateral ligament balancing multiple needle puncturing[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2010, 25(7): 1151-1156.
[45]
Boldt JG, Stiehl JB, Hodler J, et al. Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty[J]. Int Orthop, 2006, 30(5): 420-425.
[46]
Lau RL, Perruccio AV, Gandhi R, et al. The role of surgeon volume on patient outcome in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature[J/OL]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2012, 13: 250. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-250.
[47]
Mihalko WM, Whiteside LA, Krackow KA. Comparison of ligament-balancing techniques during total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol, 2003, 85: 132-135.
[48]
Nuñez M, Lozano L, Nuñez E, et al. Factors influencing health-related quality of life after TKA in patients who are obese[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(4): 1148-1153.
[49]
Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, et al. A new method for defining balance promising short-term clinical outcomes of sensor-guided TKA[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(5): 955-960.
[50]
Meneghini RM, Ziemba-Davis MM, Lovro LR, et al. Can intraoperative sensors determine the“target”ligament balance? early outcomes in total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(10): 2181-2187.
[51]
Cochetti A, Ghirardelli S, Iannotti F, et al. Sensor-guided technology helps to reproduce medial pivot kinematics in total knee arthroplasty[J/OL]. J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong), 2020, 28(3): 2309499020966133. DOI: 10.1177/2309499020966133.
[52]
Geller JA, DeMeireles AJ, Gazgalis A, et al. Collateral ligament tension and balance alone does not ensure improved outcome after total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2023, 38(6S): S196-S203.
[53]
MacDessi SJ, Cohen DA, Wood JA, et al. Does the use of intraoperative pressure sensors for knee balancing in total knee arthroplasty improve clinical outcomes? acomparative study with a minimum two-year follow-up[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2021, 36(2): 514-519.
[54]
Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, et al. A targeted approach to ligament balancing using kinetic sensors[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(7): 2127-2132.
[55]
Bardou-Jacquet J, Murgier J, Laudet F, et al. Combining load sensor and robotic technologies for ligament balance in total knee arthroplasty[J/OL]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2022, 108(5): 102889. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102889.
[56]
安浩铭, 李铁键, 孔德铭, 等. 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中应用压力垫片对术后早期功能结果的影响[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2025, 45(19): 1234-1240.
[57]
Begum FA, Kayani B, Morgan SDJ, et al. Robotic technology: current concepts, operative techniques and emerging uses in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2020, 5(5): 312-318.
[58]
Zambianchi F, Franceschi G, Rivi E, et al. Does component placement affect short-term clinical outcome in robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?[J]. Bone Jt J, 2019, 101-B(4): 435-442.
[59]
Kayani B, Haddad FS. Robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: current challenges and future perspectives[J]. Bone Jt Res, 2019, 8(6): 228-231.
[60]
Chang JS, Kayani B, Wallace C, et al. Functional alignment achieves soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty as measured with quantitative sensor-guided technology[J]. Bone Jt J, 2021, 103-B(3): 507-514.
[61]
Manning W, Ghosh M, Wilson I, et al. Improved mediolateral load distribution without adverse laxity pattern in robot-assisted knee arthroplasty compared to a standard manual measured resection technique[J]. Knee Surg Phys Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28(9): 2835-2845.
[62]
Ge J, Sun X, Liu C, et al. Intraoperative sensor technology quantifies inter-prosthesis pressure for predicting lower limb alignment after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J/OL]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2023, 11: 1210713. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1210713.
[63]
Dobzyniak M, Fehring TK, Odum S. Early failure in total hip arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 447: 76-78.
[64]
Ogawa T, Takao M, Hamada H, et al. Soft tissue tension is four times lower in the unstable primary total hip arthroplasty[J]. Int Orthop, 2018, 42(9): 2059-2065.
[65]
Díaz-Ponte S, Aristizábal-Jaramillo C, Palencia-Escorihuela M, et al. Use of soft tissue repair as a hip dislocation preventive strategy following a total hip arthroplasty by posterior and posterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic scoping review[J/OL]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2025, 20(1): 648. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05746-8.
[66]
Yang G, Lin R, Li H, et al. Implantable wireless suture sensor for in situ tendon and ligament strain monitoring[J/OL]. Sci Adv, 2025, 11(9): eadt3811. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adt3811.
[67]
Dieter V D P. Assessment of soft tissue tension during total hip arthroplasty: Measuring the forces in the neck of a prosthesis[J]. 2017.
[68]
Migliorini F, Cuozzo F, Oliva F, et al. CT-based navigation for total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis[J/OL]. Eur J Med Res, 2023, 28(1): 443. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01437-4.
[69]
Tetsunaga T, Yamada K, Tetsunaga T, et al. An accelerometer-based navigation system provides acetabular cup orientation accuracy comparable to that of computed tomography-based navigation during total hip arthroplasty in the supine position[J/OL]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2020, 15(1): 147. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01673-y.
[70]
Agarwal S, Eckhard L, Walter WL, et al. The use of computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty is associated with a reduced rate of revision for dislocation: astudy of 6, 912 navigated THA procedures from the Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry[J]. J Bone Jt Surg, 2021, 103(20): 1900-1905.
[1] 中国临床肿瘤学会乳腺癌专家委员会, 中国医师协会肿瘤多学科诊疗专业委员会, 广东省药学会. 乳腺癌内分泌治疗超说明书用药专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 69-81.
[2] 中华医学会超声医学分会, 中国研究型医院肿瘤介入治疗委员会, 中国妇幼保健协会乳腺保健专业委员会, 中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺癌专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 中国人体健康科技促进会乳腺专业委员会. 无手术适应证乳腺癌消融治疗专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 1-8.
[3] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 王坤正, 史占军, 曲铁兵. 中国膝骨关节炎关节腔注射治疗专家共识(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 1-14.
[4] 泌尿功能障碍预防和治疗专家组. 尿液菌群移植在部分女性泌尿系统疾病中的应用规范专家共识[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 127-133.
[5] 中国研究型医院学会微创外科学专业委员会. 胆道残余结石诊疗中国专家共识(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 1-8.
[6] 上海东方肝胆外科医院静脉输液委员会. 肝胆恶性肿瘤患者中长期血管通路选择及使用专家共识[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 137-145.
[7] 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会NOSES专业委员会, 中国NOSES联盟. 结肠镜辅助结肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术专家共识及操作标准[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 104-114.
[8] 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会单孔腹腔镜学组. 单孔腹腔镜结直肠手术专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 97-103.
[9] 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会, 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会微创解剖学组. 直肠癌微创精细解剖手术专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 1-16.
[10] 脊髓电刺激治疗卒中后偏瘫中国专家共识编写组, 中华医学会神经外科学分会功能神经外科学组, 中国研究型医院学会神经外科学专业委员会, 世界华人神经外科协会功能神经外科专业委员会, 北京医学会神经外科学分会功能神经外科专业组, 北京医学会神经外科学分会周围神经外科专业组. 脊髓电刺激治疗卒中后偏瘫中国专家共识(2025年)[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 8-18.
[11] 陈秀梅, 谢曼英, 陈思涓, 钟旭辉, 潘巧, 温丽娟, 本共识编写小组. 晚期非小细胞肺癌患者免疫相关不良反应的护理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 77-89.
[12] 王影新, 胡新媛, 郭杰, 赵禹, 刘飞, 曹淼. 自身免疫性大疱病患者口腔黏膜管理相关指南及共识的质量评价和内容分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 41-48.
[13] 中国医师协会介入医师分会外周血管专家工作委员会. 支气管动脉栓塞治疗咯血护理规范专家共识[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 1-11.
[14] 中华医学会检验医学分会分子诊断学组, 中华医学会检验医学分会临床免疫学组, 中国民族卫生协会流式细胞技术临床应用推广组. 医疗机构临床流式细胞实验室建设专家共识[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2026, 14(02): 89-103.
[15] 中华医学会心电生理和起搏分会, 中国医学装备协会心律失常技术分会, 中国医师协会心律学专业委员会. 心血管植入型电子器械磁共振成像检查标准流程建议[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 1-10.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?