切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华关节外科杂志(电子版)

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 267 -275. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.02.017

综述

膝关节内侧单髁置换术后并发症的诊治进展
谭红略†(), 于进洋, 史小涛, 王啸, 袁彦浩   
  1. 471002　河南省洛阳正骨医院（河南省骨科医院）
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-10 出版日期:2023-04-01
  • 通信作者: 谭红略

Diagnosis and treatment of complications after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Honglue Tan†(), Jinyang Yu, Xiaotao Shi, Xiao Wang, Yanhao Yuan   

  1. Center of Knee Joint Surgery, Henan Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital (Henan Orthopedic Hospital), Luoyang 471002, China
  • Received:2022-06-10 Published:2023-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Honglue Tan
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

谭红略, 于进洋, 史小涛, 王啸, 袁彦浩. 膝关节内侧单髁置换术后并发症的诊治进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 267-275.

Honglue Tan, Jinyang Yu, Xiaotao Shi, Xiao Wang, Yanhao Yuan. Diagnosis and treatment of complications after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 267-275.

单间室膝关节置换术(UKA)是治疗老年终末期膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的有效外科手段，并已取得了良好的长期临床随访效果。与全膝关节置换术(TKA)一样，UKA术后也存在因并发症而影响疗效的问题；而且一旦发生某些并发症，其治疗一样具有挑战性。本综述通过文献的回顾分析，探讨UKA术后并发症的临床诊治现状及导致并发症的危险因素及规避措施等，进而提高UKA术后患者的临床疗效。结果显示，相对于TKA，UKA术后并发症发生率较低，包括假体无菌性松动、外侧间室OA进展、不明原因疼痛、聚乙烯衬垫磨损、衬垫脱位、假体周围感染、假体周围骨折、下肢深静脉血栓(DVT)、骨水泥残留脱落、金属超敏反应及金属沉着病等。导致并发症的原因主要为手术适应证选择不当、手术操作不规范及围手术期管理不足所致。基于这些原因，规避术后并发症发生的有效措施为选择合适的患者、掌握规范的手术原则及标准化手术技术、关注围手术期管理等。对于治疗，将根据不同并发症的不同原因及类型，个体化选择保守或手术治疗等。

关键词: 膝, 骨关节炎, 关节成形术，置换，膝, 诊断, 治疗学

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA) is an effective surgical treatment for the endstage osteoarthritis of knee, and with good long-term clinical results. However similar to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there still exist postoperative complications that affect the clinical outcomes of UKA. Once complications occur, the treatment is challenging for orthopedic surgeons. Through retrospective analysis of the literatures, this review discussed the clinical diagnosis and treatment of complications during and after medial UKA and analyzed the risk factors that lead to the complications and the methods to prevent the complications, hence to improve the clinical efficacy of UKA. Results of the analyses have shown that the incidence of complications after UKA is lower in comparison with TKA. The perioperative complications of UKA include aseptic loosening of prosthesis, progression of arthritis in lateral compartment, unexplained pain, wear of polyethylene, mobile-bearing dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), periprosthetic fracture, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), bone cement residue and metal allergy, etc. The main causes for complications are improper surgical indications, poor surgical technique and inadequate perioperative management. Based on these factors, effective measures to avoid postoperative complications should be taken to select suitable patients, master standardised surgical techniques and procedures, and pay more attention to perioperative management. For treatment of complications, conservative or surgical treatment should be applied individually according to types and causes of the complications.

Key words: Knee, Osteoarthritis, Arthroplasty, replacement, knee, Diagnosis, Therapeutics
[1]
Mohammad HR, Strickland L, Hamilton TW, et al. Long-term outcomes of over 8, 000 medial Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knees-a systematic review[J]. Acta Orthop，2018, 89(1): 101-107.
[2]
Pandit H, Hamilton TW, Jenkins C, et al. The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs[J]. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97-B(11): 1493-1500.
[3]
Kim KT, Lee S, Lee JI, et al. Analysis and treatment of complications after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2016, 28(1): 46-54.
[4]
Bhattacharya R, Scott CE, Morris HE, et al. Survivorship and patient satisfaction of a fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty incorporating an all-polyethylene tibial component[J]. Knee, 2012, 19(4): 348-351.
[5]
Peersman G, Stuyts B, Vandenlangenbergh T, et al. Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015, 23(11): 3296-3305.
[6]
Kannan, Lewis PL, Dyer C, et al. Do fixed or mobile bearing implants have better survivorship in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A study from the Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2021, 479(7): 1548-1558.
[7]
Barrett MC, Wilkinson FO, Blom AW, et al. Incidence, temporal trends and potential risk factors for aseptic loosening following primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 96, 294 knees[J]. Knee, 2021, 31: 28-38.
[8]
Ji JH, Park SE, Song IS, et al. Complications of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2014, 6(4): 365-372.
[9]
张启栋，郭万首，刘朝晖，等. 膝关节单髁置换术早中期并发症分析[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(4): 443-447.
[10]
Inui H, Taketomi S, Yamagami R, et al. Femoral migration of the cementless Oxford which caused the bearing dislocation: a report of two cases[J/OL]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21(1): 356. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03385-0.
[11]
Nie Y, Yu Q, Shen B. Impact of tibial component coronal alignment on knee joint biomechanics following fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis[J]. Orthop Surg, 2021, 13(4): 1423-1429.
[12]
Sabah SA, Lim CT, Middleton R, et al. Management of aseptic failure of the mobile-bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee, 2020, 27(6): 1721-1728.
[13]
Epinette JA, Brunschweiler B, Mertl P, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty modes of failure: wear is not the main reason for failure: a multicentre study of 418 failed knees[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2012, 98(6 Suppl): S124-S130.
[14]
Lewis PL, Graves SE, de Steiger RN, et al. Does knee prosthesis survivorship improve when implant designs change? Findings from the Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2020, 478(6): 1156-1172.
[15]
Wen PF, Guo WS, Gao FQ, et al. Effects of lower limb alignment and tibial component inclination on the biomechanics of lateral compartment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2017, 130(21): 2563-2568.
[16]
Tashiro Y, Matsuda S, Okazaki K, et al. The coronal alignment after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can be predicted: usefulness of full-length valgus stress radiography for evaluating correctability[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014, 22(12): 3142-3149.
[17]
Bloom KJ, Gupta RR, Caravella JW, et al. The effects of primary implant bearing design on the complexity of revision unicondylar knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(1): 106-109.
[18]
Barrett WP, Scott RD. Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1987, 69(9): 1328-1335.
[19]
Bolognesi MP, Marchant MH, Viens NA, et al. The impact of diabetes on perioperative patient outcomes after total hip and total knee arthroplasty in the United States[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2008, 23(6 Suppl 1): 92-98.
[20]
彭智浩，冯宗权，邹勇根，等. 活动平台单髁置换后下肢力线与外侧间室骨关节炎进展的关系[J]. 中国组织工程研究，2021, 25(9): 1368-1374.
[21]
Slaven SE, Cody JP, Sershon RA, et al. The impact of coronal alignment on revision in medial fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(2): 353-357.
[22]
Scott CE, Wade FA, Bhattacharya R, et al. Changes in bone density in metal-backed and all-polyethylene medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(3): 702-709.
[23]
Pegg EC, Walter J, Mellon SJ, et al. Evaluation of factors affecting tibial bone strain after unicompartmental knee replacement[J]. J Orthop Res, 2013, 31(5): 821-828.
[24]
van der List JP, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. Why do medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties fail today？[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(5): 1016-1021.
[25]
Knifsund J, Hatakka J, Keemu H, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties are performed on the patients with radiologically too mild osteoarthritis[J]. Scand J Surg, 2017, 106(4): 338-341.
[26]
Inui H, Taketomi S, Yamagami R, et al. Snapping pes syndrome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2016, 28(2): 172-175.
[27]
Gudena R, Pilambaraei MA, Werle J, et al. A safe overhang limit for unicompartmental knee arthroplasties based on medial collateral ligament strains: an in vitro study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(2): 227-233.
[28]
Lyu SR, Hsu CC, Hung JP. Medial abrasion syndrome: a neglected cause of persistent pain after knee arthroplasty[J/OL]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1): 61. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02191-7.
[29]
Jämsen E, Varonen M, Huhtala H, et al. Incidence of prosthetic joint infections after primary knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2010, 25(1): 87-92.
[30]
Wilson HA, Middleton R, Abram SGF, et al. Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. BMJ, 2019, 364: l352. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l352.
[31]
Argenson JN, Arndt M, Babis G, et al. Hip and knee section, treatment, debridement and retention of implant: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2019, 34(2S): S399-S419.
[32]
Society of Unicondylar Research and Continuing Education. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(8 Suppl): 46-50.
[33]
Chalmers BP, Kapadia M, Chiu YF, et al. Treatment and outcome of periprosthetic joint infection in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(7): 1917-1923.
[34]
Hernandez NM, Petis SM, Hanssen AD, et al. Infection after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a high risk of subsequent complications[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2019, 477(1): 70-77.
[35]
Burger JA, Jager T, Dooley MS, et al. Comparable incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2022, 30(3): 852-874.
[36]
Sloper PJH, Hing CB, Donell ST, et al. Intra-operative tibial plateau fracture during unicompartmental knee replacement: a case report[J]. Knee, 2003, 10(4): 367-369.
[37]
Mohammad HR, Matharu GS, Judge A, et al. Comparison of the 10-year outcomes of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man[J]. Acta Orthop, 2020, 91(1): 76-81.
[38]
Houskamp DJ, Tompane T, Barlow BT. What is the critical tibial resection depth during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A biomechanical study of fracture risk[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(8): 2244-2248.
[39]
Chui EC, Lau LC, Kwok CK, et al. Tibial cutting guide (resector) holding pins position and subsequent risks of periprosthetic fracture in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis study[J/OL]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1): 205. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02308-6.
[40]
Yoshikawa R, Hiranaka T, Okamoto K, et al. The medial eminence line for predicting tibial fracture risk after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2020, 12(2): 166-170.
[41]
Lee SJ. Anterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a case report[J/OL]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2021, 65: 102328. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102328.
[42]
Akan B, Yildirim T, Karaguven D. Medial femoral condyle fracture after cementless unicompartmental knee replacement: a rare complication[J]. Knee, 2013, 20(4): 295-297.
[43]
Yang KY, Wang MC, Yeo SJ, et al. Minimally invasive unicondylar versus total condylar knee arthroplasty-early results of a matched-pair comparison[J]. Singapore Med J, 2003, 44(11): 559-562.
[44]
Brown NM, Sheth NP, Davis K, et al. Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(8 Suppl): 86-90.
[45]
Hurst JM, Ranieri R, Berend KR, et al. Outcomes after arthroscopic evaluation of patients with painful medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(10): 3268-3272.
[46]
Fournier G, Gaillard R, Swan J, et al. Stiffness after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: risk factors and arthroscopic treatment[J/OL]. SICOT J, 2021, 7: 35. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2021034.
[47]
Batailler C, White N, Ranaldi FM, et al. Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(4): 1232-1240.
[48]
Herry Y, Batailler C, Lording T, et al. Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique[J]. Int Orthop, 2017, 41(11): 2265-2271.
[49]
Mergenthaler G, Batailler C, Lording T, et al. Is robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty a safe procedure? A case control study[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2021, 29(3): 931-938.
[50]
Negrín R, Duboy J, Iñiguez M, et al. Robotic-assisted vs conventional surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study[J/OL]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2021, 33(1): 5. DOI: 10.1186/s43019-021-00087-2.
[51]
Jamshed S, Shah R, Arooj A, et al. A novel radiographic technique to assess 180° rotational spin of the Oxford unicompartmental knee mobile bearing[J]. J Orthop, 2020, 21: 438-443.
[52]
Bae JH, Kim JG, Lee SY, et al. Epidemiology of bearing dislocations after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: multicenter analysis of 67 bearing dislocations[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(1): 265-271.
[53]
关振鹏，李沼. 优化活动平台单髁术后衬垫脱位的预防与治疗策略[J]. 中华外科杂志，2020, 58(6): 416-419.
[54]
Sun X, Liu P, Lu F, et al. Bearing dislocation of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in East Asian countries: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J/OL]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1): 28. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02190-8.
[55]
Pontoh LA, Dilogo IH, Hartono F, et al. Meniscal bearing dislocation following minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty treated with simple open reduction: case report[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2021, 79: 371-374.
[56]
Fujii T, Matsui Y, Noboru M, et al. Meniscal bearing dislocation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with faint symptom[J/OL]. Case Rep Orthop, 2015, 2015: 217842. DOI: 10.1155/2015/217842.
[57]
Kim SG, Kim HG, Lee SY, et al. Redislocation after bearing exchange for the treatment of mobile bearing dislocation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2018, 30(3): 234-240.
[58]
Lombardi AV Jr, Kolich MT, Berend KR, et al. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: is it as good as a primary result？[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(7S): S105-S108.
[59]
Kim WY, Shafi M, Kim YY, et al. Posteromedial compartment cement extrusion after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty treated by arthroscopy: a case report[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2006, 14(1): 46-49.
[60]
Apostolopoulos AP, Balfousias T, Khan S, et al. Failure of a medial unicompartmental knee replacement due to metal allergy[J]. J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 2018, 28(4): 319-325.
[61]
余鹏，孙长鲛，蔡谞. 金属超敏反应在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(6): 700-706.
[62]
King SW, Royeca JM, Cunningham CM, et al. Metal hypersensitivity in total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthrosc Joint Surg, 2020, 7(4): 184-188.
[63]
Spector BM, Ries MD, Bourne RB, et al. Wear performance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene on oxidized zirconium total knee femoral components[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001, 83-A(Suppl 2 Pt 2): 80-86.
[64]
Vecchini E, Ditta A, Gelmini M, et al. Rupture of the femoral component and severe metallosis of the knee 10 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): a case report[J]. Acta Biomed, 2019, 90(1-S): 198-202.
[65]
Helito CP, Buarque de Gusmão CV, Angelini FJ, et al. Severe metallosis following total knee arthroplasty: a case report and review of radiographic signs[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2014, 43(8): 1169-1173.
[66]
Worland RL, Arredondo J, Angles F, et al. Scintigraphic evaluation in total knee failure secondary to severe metallosis[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1998, 13(1): 116-119.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[3] 吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[4] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[5] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[6] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗：10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[7] 许丁伟, 马江云, 李新成, 黄洁. Alagille综合征疑诊为先天性胆道闭锁一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 681-687.
[8] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[9] 邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
[10] 赵立力, 王魁向, 张小冲, 李志远. 血沉与C-反应蛋白比值在假体周围感染中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 351-355.
[11] 付庆鹏, 邓晓强, 高伟, 姜福民, 范永峰, 吴海贺, 齐岩松, 包呼日查, 徐永胜. 新型股骨测量定位器在全膝关节置换术中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 980-987.
[12] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[13] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[14] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号