切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 154 -159. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.02.003

临床论著

加速康复方式对老年患者全膝关节置换术后的影响
朱倩桃1,(), 肖茜1, 吴克第2   
  1. 1. 571700 儋州,海南西部中心医院康复医学科
    2. 571700 儋州,海南西部中心医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-19 出版日期:2022-04-01
  • 通信作者: 朱倩桃

Postoperative effects of enhanced recovery on elderly patients of total knee replacement

Qiantao Zhu1,(), Xi Xiao1, Kedi Wu2   

  1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Hainan Western Central Hospital, Danzhou 571700, China
    2. Department of Orthopaedics of Hainan Western Central Hospital, Danzhou 571700, China
  • Received:2021-01-19 Published:2022-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Qiantao Zhu
引用本文:

朱倩桃, 肖茜, 吴克第. 加速康复方式对老年患者全膝关节置换术后的影响[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 154-159.

Qiantao Zhu, Xi Xiao, Kedi Wu. Postoperative effects of enhanced recovery on elderly patients of total knee replacement[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(02): 154-159.

目的

探讨不同的康复方式对老年全膝关节置换术患者术后焦虑、镇痛效果及生活质量的影响。

方法

选取2017年11月到2020年6月于海南西部中心医院骨科门诊收入院的退行性膝关节炎老年患者100例,年龄≥65岁,均为初次行单侧全膝关节置换术,排除存在既往膝关节手术史、下肢其他关节功能障碍、凝血功能异常、下肢深静脉血栓(DVT)以及依从性差的患者。所有患者由同一高年资手术医师完成手术。按随机数字法分为两组,其中实验组给予加速康复措施,对照组给予常规康复措施,记录包括手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量,评估住院指标。于术前、术后1个月、术后6个月评估患者疼痛视觉评分(VAS)、焦虑自评量表系统评分(SAS)、膝关节综合评分(AKS)及生活质量评分(SF-36)。记录患者自手术至术后6个月内发生的手术相关性感染、DVT、假体松动、关节返修、骨关节炎进展等发生情况。计量资料采用独立样本t检验,重复测量资料比较采用球形检验,若不满足球型分布,需采用Green house-Geisser方法对自由度进行校正后计算;计数资料采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。

结果

实验组较对照组手术时间(t=8.618)、住院时间(t=4.116)较短,首次下床时间(t=16.360)较早,术中出血量及住院总花费较少(t=16.359、5.839,均为P<0.05)。经治疗,两组VAS评分、SAS评分均降低,AKS评分、SF-36评分均升高。术前、术后1个月、术后6个月两组患者SAS、VAS、AKS及SF-36评分均不满足球型分布,实验组SAS、VAS评分均低于对照组(F=5.201、9.018),AKS评分(F=7.231、10.205)、SF-36评分(F=20.102、7.118)均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.05),且无交互作用(均为P>0.05)。实验组并发症发生率为10.0%,对照组为28.0%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.263,P=0.022)。

结论

加速康复外科可优化老年全膝关节置换术患者的住院指标,减少术中出血及术后并发症,缓解焦虑,提高镇痛效果、膝关节功能及生活质量。

Objective

To explore the effects of different rehabilitation methods on postoperative anxiety, analgesia and quality of life in elderly patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

A total of 100 elderly patients with degenerative knee arthritis (≥65 years old) who received unilateral total knee replacement for the first time were selected from November 2017 to June 2020 in the Department of Orthopedics Outpatient Department of Hainan West Central Hospital. Patients with previous knee surgery, other joint dysfunction of lower extremities, abnormal coagulation function, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremities, and poor compliance were excluded. All the patients were operated by the same senior surgeon. According to the random number method, they were divided into two groups. After the surgery, the experimental group accepted enhanced recovery, and the control group accepted conventional recovery. The records included operation time, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, and evaluation of hospitalization indicators. The patients were assessed by the visual pain score (VAS), the anxiety self-rating scale system score (SAS), the knee joint comprehensive score (AKS) and the quality of life score (SF-36) before surgery, one month and six months after the surgery. The occurrence of surgery-related infections, DVT, prosthesis loosening, joint repair, and progression of osteoarthritis that occurred within six months after the surgery were recorded. The independent-sample t test was used for measurement data, spherical test was used for comparison of repeated measurement data. When the spherical distribution was not satisfied, the degree of freedom needed to be corrected by the Green house-Geisser method . The count data were calculated by chi-square test or Fishers exact test.

Results

Compared with the control group, the experimental group had shorter operation time (t=8.618), shorter hospitalization time (t=4.116), earlier time to get out of bed (t=16.360), less intraoperative blood loss and total hospitalization cost (t=16.359, 5.839, both P < 0.05). After treatment, VAS score and SAS score decreased, AKS score and SF-36 score increased in both groups. SAS, VAS, AKS and SF-36 scores in the two groups did not meet the spherical distribution before surgery, one month after surgery and six months after surgery. SAS and VAS scores in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (F=5.201, 9.018). AKS score (F=7.231, 10.205) and SF-36 score (F=20.102, 7.118) were higher than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (all P <0.05), and there was no interaction (all P > 0.05). The incidence of complications was 10.0% in the experimental group and 28.0% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.263, P=0.022).

Conclusion

Enhanced recovery after surgery can optimize the hospitalization indicators of elderly patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, reduce intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications, relieve anxiety, improve analgesic effect, knee joint function and quality of life.

表1 两组一般资料比较
表2 患者手术指标比较(±s)
表3 患者住院指标比较(±s)
表4 两组患者在不同时间点SAS、VAS、AKS及SF-36评分比较(±s)
表5 两组并发症发生情况[例(%)]
[1]
王峰,孟晨,曹兴兵,等. 半髋关节置换治疗高龄患者复杂股骨粗隆间骨折[J]. 中国骨伤201831(9):818-823.
[2]
Zhu YZYao RZhang Z,et al.Parecoxib prevents early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty:a double-blind,randomized clinical consort study[J/OL].Medicine201695(28):e4082.DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000004082.
[3]
Steenhagen E.Enhanced recovery after surgery[J].Nutr Clin Pract201631(1):18-29.
[4]
Ota HIkenaga MHasegawa J,et al.Safety and efficacy of an "enhanced recovery after surgery" protocol for patients undergoing colon cancer surgery:a multi-institutional controlled study[J].Surg Today201747(6):668-675.
[5]
周宗科,翁习生,曲铁兵,等.中国髋、膝关节置换术加速康复—围术期管理策略专家共识[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志20169(1):1-9.
[6]
马莹,刘艳军,李春燕,等.医院焦虑抑郁量表用于耳鼻咽喉科住院患者心理状态评估的调查研究[J].肿瘤预防与治疗202033(6):519-524.
[7]
仇雅云.优质护理对类风湿性关节炎患者生活质量的影响探析[J/CD].实用临床护理学电子杂志20205(4):37,46.DOI:CNKI:SUN:SLHL.0.2020-04-031.
[8]
孙丽霞,海仙.整体护理对慢性萎缩性胃炎患者疼痛视觉模拟评分及满意度的影响[J].现代医药卫生201935(22):3535-3537.
[9]
王海滨,王立伟,晏征,等.人工全膝关节置换术治疗晚期膝关节骨性关节炎效果及对患者VAS评分影响分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘201919(A1):20-21.
[10]
杨礼庆,马超,杜帅.人工全膝关节置换术围手术期疼痛管理现状[J].中国矫形外科杂志201725(3):247-250.
[11]
刘强,熊小云,杨曼,等.全膝关节置换术后康复治疗的研究进展[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志202042(8):760-763.
[12]
Chou LNChen ML.Effects of elastic band exercise on lower limb rehabilitation of elderly patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty[J].Rehabil Nurs201944(1):60-66.
[13]
孙凯,陈蕾,麦瑶,等.加速康复外科在前交叉韧带重建围术期的应用[J].中国组织工程研究202125(11):1647-1651.
[14]
支梦伟,江志伟,戴新娟,等.加速康复外科指导下胃癌患者围手术期心率变异度的临床观察[J].山东大学学报(医学版)202058(11):85-91.
[15]
杜娜,郭成林,杨梅,等.加速康复外科在中国大陆胸外科临床现状——基于胸外科医生及护士调查分析[J].中国肺癌杂志201720(3):157-162.
[16]
双峰,邵银初,余婷,等.不同康复途径对膝关节脱位术后康复训练的影响[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)202014(2):235-238.
[17]
杨智慧,朱述侠,叶丽,等.加速康复外科在腰丛-腰椎旁神经阻滞人工髋关节置换术后的应用[J].广东医学201839(10):1586-1589.
[18]
Li JZhu H, Liao R. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for primary hip and knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J/OL].Trials201920(1):599. DOI:10.1186/s13063-019-3706-8.
[19]
董佩龙,唐晓波,王健,等.加速康复外科在全膝关节置换术中的随机对照研究[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)202014(5):540-545.
[20]
吕猛,罗奇,周天健,等.加速康复外科在肥胖患者膝关节置换术中的应用[J].广东医学201738(19):2988-2991.
[1] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[2] 孙俊锋, 涂家金, 付丹, 蒋满香, 刘金晶, 崔乃硕. 手部烧伤瘢痕挛缩畸形整形术后综合康复联合点阵二氧化碳激光治疗的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 411-415.
[3] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[4] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[7] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[8] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[9] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[10] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[11] 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 上肢外骨骼机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 312-317.
[12] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[13] 崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
[14] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[15] 刘芳明, 石秀秀, 唐冲, 张克石, 徐影, 王桂杉, 关振鹏, 李晓. 骨科康复患者对数字疗法应用的知晓度和需求度:一项基于928 份问卷调查结果分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 654-661.
阅读次数
全文


摘要