运动学及机械对线全膝关节置换术早期临床结果对比

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.02.006

目的

探讨传统器械行运动学对线(KA)和机械对线(MA)全膝关节置换术(TKA)的差异和早期临床结果。

方法

回顾分析2020年4月至2020年7月因膝骨关节炎在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院行TKA手术患者，排除既往下肢骨折病史及下肢严重畸形患者，其中男6例，女30例，平均年龄(68.4±6.0)岁。根据手术方式分为KA-TKA组17例，MA-TKA组19例。比较两组的手术时间，术后第3天血红蛋白(Hb)值，术后第5天膝关节主动活动度(AROM)，术后3月髋-膝-踝角(HKA)，膝关节临床评分(KS-C)和膝关节功能评分(KS-F)。手术前后同组数据采用配对t检验，两组间数据采用独立样本t检验。

结果

KA-TKA和MA-TKA两组手术时间分别为(76.9±11.8)min和(78.3±12.7)min，差异无统计学意义(t＝0.35，P>0.05)。两组术后HKA分别为(2.7±1.2)°和(2.1±1.5)°，差异无统计学意义(t＝1.60，P>0.05)。两组术后第3天Hb值分别为(113.3±9.1)和(111.3±8.2)g/L，差异无统计学意义(t＝0.70，P>0.05)。两组术后第5天AROM值分别为(105.6±8.3)°和(95.4±14.9)°，差异有统计学意义(t＝2.50，P<0.05)。两组术后3月KS-C评分分别为(82.8±6.2)和(78.1±7.3)，差异有统计学意义(t＝2.05，P<0.05)。两组术后3月KS-F评分分别为(80.3±10.9)和(71.3±14.3)，差异有统计学意义(t＝2.09，P<0.05)。

结论

传统器械KA-TKA早期临床结果较MA-TKA存在一定优势，且不会额外增加手术难度和手术风险。

关键词: 骨关节炎, 膝, 关节成形术, 置换

Objective

To explore the difference and early clinical results of kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional instruments.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing TKAs at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University from April 2020 to July 2020 due to knee osteoarthritis.Patients with a history of lower extremity fractures and severe deformities of the lower extremities were excluded, including six males and 30 females, with an average age of (68.4±6.0)years. There were 17 cases in the KA-TKA group and 19 cases in the MA-TKA group. The time of the surgical procedure, the value of hemoglobin (Hb) on the third day after the surgery, the active rang of motion (AROM) on the fifth day after the surgery, the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) three months after surgery, the knee joint clinical score(KS-C) and the knee joint functional score (KS-F) three months after the surgery in both groups, were recorded and analyzed statistically. The data of the same group before and after the surgery were analyzed by paired t test, and the data between the two groups was analyzed by independent t test.

Results

The surgical procedure durations of the KA-TKA and MA-TKA groups were (76.9±11.8) and (78.3±12.7) min, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant(t=0.35, P>0.05). The HKA of the two groups after the surgery were (2.7±1.2) and (2.1±1.5) respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (t=1.60, P>0.05). The Hb values of the two groups on the third day after the surgery were (113.3±9.1) and (111.3±8.2) g/L, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant(t=0.70, P>0.05). The AROM values of the two groups on the fifth day after the surgery were (105.6±8.3) ° and (95.4±14.9)° respectively, the difference was statistically significant(t=2.50, P<0.05). The KS-C of the two groups three months after the surgery were (82.8±6.2) and (78.1±7.3) respectively, the difference was statistically significant(t=2.05, P<0.05). The KS-F of the two groups 3 months after the surgery were (80.3±10.9) and (71.3±14.3) respectively, the difference was statistically significant(t=2.09, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The KA-TKA can achieve better results than MA-TKA with conventional instruments, and will not increase the difficulty and risk of the operation.

Key words: Osteoarthritis, knee, Arthroplasty, replacement

图1 KA-TKA(运动学对线全膝关节置换术)术前计划及术后冠状位对线。图A为术前双下肢负重位全长X线，测量股骨及胫骨畸形角度，依照参照角度，拟术后下肢力线残留2°内翻；图B为胫骨冠状位截骨的体表标志点的确定(该病例指向外踝尖)；图C为术中依照术前计划的体表标志点行冠状位对线；图D为术后双下肢负重位全长X线，示恢复了患者原有的下肢力线

图2 KA-TKA(运动学对线全膝关节置换术)的胫骨侧对线。图A为胫骨旋转对线参考轴，确定外侧胫骨平台椭圆形关节面的长轴，并将该轴线平行移动到PCL止点中点处；图B为胫骨后倾，后倾角度的设定参考内侧胫骨平台的自然后倾；图C为胫骨内外翻对线，保持髓外定位杆近端旋转对线不变，定位杆远端移至术前规划的体表标志点

图3 KA-TKA(运动学对线全膝关节置换术)股骨侧对线。图A为股骨远端对线，使用髓内定位杆控制截骨导板矢状位定位，2 mm钕磁片补偿内侧股骨远端软骨磨损，外翻截骨导向器内外侧均与股骨髁紧密接触，以复制患者原有的生理外翻；图B为股骨后髁对线，0°旋转定位，优先使用后参考定位(如有)，或保守的后髁截骨(前参考定位器械)，先截后髁，再截其他各面

表1 KA-TKA与MA-TKA两组患者术前资料比较(±s)

分组	例数	年龄(岁)	术前HKA(°)	术前Hb(g/L)	术前AROM(°)	术前KS-C	术前KS-F
KA-TKA组	17	69±7	8±3	135±13	107±10	51±71	46±7
MA-TKA组	19	68±5	7±3	130±11	101±15	56±19	43±8
t值		0.63	1.50	1.08	1.55	1.09	1.17
P值		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

表1 KA-TKA与MA-TKA两组患者术前资料比较(±s)

分组	例数	年龄(岁)	术前HKA(°)	术前Hb(g/L)	术前AROM(°)	术前KS-C	术前KS-F
KA-TKA组	17	69±7	8±3	135±13	107±10	51±71	46±7
MA-TKA组	19	68±5	7±3	130±11	101±15	56±19	43±8
t值		0.63	1.50	1.08	1.55	1.09	1.17
P值		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

表2 KA-TKA组患者手术前后指标比较[n＝17，(±s)]

时间点	HKA(°)	KS-C评分	KS-F评分	Hb(g/L)	AROM(°)
术前	8.2±3.1	50.5±7.3	45.8±7.5	134.6±13.5	107.3±10.3
术后	2.7±1.2	82.8±6.2^a	80.3±10.9^a	113.3±9.1^b	105.6±8.3^c
t值	9.91	16.15	16.42	6.15	1.16
P值	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	>0.05

表2 KA-TKA组患者手术前后指标比较[n＝17，(±s)]

时间点	HKA(°)	KS-C评分	KS-F评分	Hb(g/L)	AROM(°)
术前	8.2±3.1	50.5±7.3	45.8±7.5	134.6±13.5	107.3±10.3
术后	2.7±1.2	82.8±6.2^a	80.3±10.9^a	113.3±9.1^b	105.6±8.3^c
t值	9.91	16.15	16.42	6.15	1.16
P值	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	>0.05

表3 MA-TKA组患者手术前后指标比较[n＝19，(±s)]

时间点	HKA(°)	KS-C评分	KS-F评分	Hb(g/L)	AROM(°)
术前	6.5±3.5	55.7±19.2	42.9±7.7	130.1±11.1	100.5±15.2
术后	2.1±1.5	78.1±7.3^a	71.3±14.3^a	111.3±8.2^b	95.4±14.9^c
t值	6.43	3.28	8.26	5.02	1.22
P值	<0.001	<0.01	<0.001	<0.001	>0.05

表3 MA-TKA组患者手术前后指标比较[n＝19，(±s)]

时间点	HKA(°)	KS-C评分	KS-F评分	Hb(g/L)	AROM(°)
术前	6.5±3.5	55.7±19.2	42.9±7.7	130.1±11.1	100.5±15.2
术后	2.1±1.5	78.1±7.3^a	71.3±14.3^a	111.3±8.2^b	95.4±14.9^c
t值	6.43	3.28	8.26	5.02	1.22
P值	<0.001	<0.01	<0.001	<0.001	>0.05

表4 KA-TKA与MA-TKA两组术后指标及手术时间比较(±s)

分组	例数	手术时间(min)	术后HKA(°)	术后第3天Hb(g/L)	术后第5天AROM(°)	术后3个月KS-C	术后3个月KS-F
KA-TKA组	17	76.9±11.8	2.7±1.2	113.3±9.1	105.6±8.3	82.8±6.2	80.3±10.9
MA-TKA组	19	78.3±12.7	2.1±1.5	111.3±8.2	95.4±14.9	78.1±7.3	71.3±14.3
t值		0.35	1.60	0.70	2.50	2.05	2.09
P值		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	0.018	0.048	0.044

表4 KA-TKA与MA-TKA两组术后指标及手术时间比较(±s)

分组	例数	手术时间(min)	术后HKA(°)	术后第3天Hb(g/L)	术后第5天AROM(°)	术后3个月KS-C	术后3个月KS-F
KA-TKA组	17	76.9±11.8	2.7±1.2	113.3±9.1	105.6±8.3	82.8±6.2	80.3±10.9
MA-TKA组	19	78.3±12.7	2.1±1.5	111.3±8.2	95.4±14.9	78.1±7.3	71.3±14.3
t值		0.35	1.60	0.70	2.50	2.05	2.09
P值		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	0.018	0.048	0.044

[1]	Nam D, Nunley RM, Barrack RL. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern？[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-B(11 Supple A): 96-100.
[2]	Oussedik S, Abdel MP, Victor J, et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Bone Joint J, 2020, 102-B(3): 276-279.
[3]	Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, et al. The chitranjan ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(1): 45-53.
[4]	Vanlommel L, Vanlommel J, Claes S, et al. Slight undercorrection following total knee arthroplasty results in superior clinical outcomes in varus knees[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(10): 2325-2330.
[5]	Courtney PM, Lee GC. Early outcomes of kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of the literature[J/OL]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(6): 2028-2032.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.041.
[6]	Dossett HG, Swartz GJ, Estrada NA, et al. Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(2): e160-e169.
[7]	Howell SM, Chen J, Hull ML. Variability of the location of the tibial tubercle affects the rotational alignment of the tibial component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(10): 2288-2295.
[8]	Howell SM, Hull ML. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Definition, history, principle, surgical technique, and results of an alignment option for TKA[J]. Arthropaedia, 2014, 1:44-53.
[9]	Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2000, 82B(8): 1189-1195.
[10]	Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, et al. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category？[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(3): 1000-1007.
[11]	王志为，温亮，于洋，等．个性化截骨工具辅助下运动学对线全膝关节置换的早期临床结果[J]．中华外科杂志，2020,58(6):457-463.
[12]	温亮，王志为．个体化导板辅助全膝关节置换运动学对线技术[J/CD]．中华关节外科杂志(电子版)，2020,14(1):85-91.
[13]	Howell SM, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik KT, et al. Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(10): 2271-2280.
[14]	Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Rudert M, et al. How frequent is rotational mismatch within 0°±10° in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty？[J]. Orthopedics, 2013, 36(12): e1515-e1520.
[15]	Lee YS, Howell SM, Won YY, et al. Kinematic alignment is a possible alternative to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(11): 3467-3479.
[16]	Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, et al. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-B(7): 907-913.
[17]	Rivière C, Iranpour F, Auvinet E, et al. Alignment options for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2017, 103(7): 1047-1056.
[18]	Rivière C, Iranpour F, Auvinet E, et al. Mechanical alignment technique for TKA: are there intrinsic technical limitations？[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2017, 103(7): 1057-1067.
[19]	Shelton TJ, Gill M, Athwal G, et al. Outcomes in patients with a calipered kinematically aligned TKA that already had a contralateral mechanically aligned TKA[J]. J Knee Surg, 2021, 34(1): 87-93.
[20]	Howell SM, Shelton TJ, Hull ML. Implant survival and function ten years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(12): 3678-3684.
[21]	Malkani AL, Rand JA, Bryan RS, et al. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis. A ten-year follow-up study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1995, 77(3): 423-431.
[22]	Matziolis G, Adam J, Perka C. Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2010, 130(12): 1487-1491.
[23]	Bonner TJ, Eardley WG, Patterson P, et al. The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, 93(9): 1217-1222.
[24]	Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, et al. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(12): 2143-2149.
[25]	An VG, Twiggs J, Leie M, et al. Kinematic alignment is bone and soft tissue preserving compared to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee, 2019, 26(2): 466-476.
[26]	Hull ML, Howell SM. Differences in trochlear morphology from native using a femoral component interfaced with an anatomical patellar prosthesis in kinematic alignment and mechanical alignment[J/OL]. J Knee Surg, 2020, doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716413.
[27]	Riviere C, Dhaif F, Shah H, et al. Kinematic alignment of current TKA implants does not restore the native trochlear anatomy[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2018, 104(7): 983-995.
[28]	Lozano R, Campanelli V, Howell S, et al. Kinematic alignment more closely restores the groove location and the sulcus angle of the native trochlea than mechanical alignment: implications for prosthetic design[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(5): 1504-1513.
[29]	Keshmiri A, Maderbacher G, Baier C, et al. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty leads to a better restoration of patellar kinematics compared to mechanic alignment[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(5): 1529-1534.
[30]	Kim KK, Howell SM, Won YY. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrument[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2020, 61(3): 201-209.
[31]	Luo Z, Zhou K, Peng L, et al. Similar results with kinematic and mechanical alignment applied in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28(6): 1720-1735.
[32]	Blakeney WG, Vendittoli P. Restricted kinematic alignment：the ideal compromise？[M]. Switzerland: Springer, 2020: 197-206.
[33]	Macdessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Chen DB, et al. Restoring the constitutional alignment with a restrictive kinematic protocol improves quantitative soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Bone Joint J, 2020, 102-B(1): 117-124.
[34]	Howell SM, Howell SJ, Hull ML. Assessment of the radii of the medial and lateral femoral condyles in varus and valgus knees with osteoarthritis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(1): 98-104.

[1]	林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[2]	闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[3]	黄子荣, 罗渝鑫, 杨文瀚, 陈小虎, 谢环宇, 朱伟民. 前交叉韧带重建对膝关节稳定性影响的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 847-854.
[4]	樊绪国, 赵永刚, 杨砚伟. 腓骨在膝骨关节炎作用的研究观点[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 855-859.
[5]	贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[6]	孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[7]	王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[8]	夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[9]	李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[10]	陈山林, 魏绮珮, 刘畅. 腕关节假体：路在何方？[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 469-475.
[11]	吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[12]	中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[13]	邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
[14]	王旭, 师绍敏, 毛燕, 季上, 刘亚玲. 肝酶代谢与骨关节炎相关性的研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 379-384.
[15]	付庆鹏, 邓晓强, 高伟, 姜福民, 范永峰, 吴海贺, 齐岩松, 包呼日查, 徐永胜. 新型股骨测量定位器在全膝关节置换术中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 980-987.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Comparison of early clinical outcomes of kinematic and mechanical alignments in total knee arthroplasty

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Comparison of early clinical outcomes of kinematic and mechanical alignments in total knee arthroplasty