切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 137 -142. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.02.002

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

腕关节镜辅助切开复位内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折效果
周小平,1, 庄家林1, 刘宗超2   
  1. 1. 621000 绵阳市骨科医院上肢外科
    2. 646000 泸州,西南医科大学附属中医医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-07 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 周小平

Effect of wrist arthroscopy assisted open reduction and internal fixation in treatment of distal radius fractures

Xiaoping Zhou,1, Jialin Zhuang1, Zongchao Liu2   

  1. 1. Department of Upper Limb Surgery, Mianyang Orthopedic Hospital, Mianyang 621000, China
    2. Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
  • Received:2020-08-07 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoping Zhou
引用本文:

周小平, 庄家林, 刘宗超. 腕关节镜辅助切开复位内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 137-142.

Xiaoping Zhou, Jialin Zhuang, Zongchao Liu. Effect of wrist arthroscopy assisted open reduction and internal fixation in treatment of distal radius fractures[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 137-142.

目的

研究腕关节镜辅助切开复位内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折治疗中的效果。

方法

本研究为前瞻性研究,选取研究对象为绵阳市骨科医院2014年1月到2018年12月接治的82例桡骨远端骨折患者,纳入病例均经腕关节CT和X线提示桡骨远端骨折,国际内固定研究协会(AO)分型为C型骨折,且由外伤所致,均累及关节面,并为单侧损伤。排除陈旧性骨折者,严重骨质疏松及合并其他骨折者,重要脏器功能异常者,精神疾病者。按随机数字表法将患者分为研究组42例和对照组40例,其中研究组给予腕关节镜辅助下切开复位内固定术,对照组给予传统切开复位钢板内固定术。评定两组临床疗效,并采用卡方检验比较其差异。记录两组术中指标及骨折愈合时间,测定两组术前、术后1年腕关节活动度,同时采用上肢功能评定量表(DASH)、腕关节自行评估量表(PRWE)对两组术前、术后1年上肢功能、腕关节功能进行评定,并采用t检验比较组间计量资料差异。

结果

研究组治疗后优良率为92.9 %,远高于对照组优良率75.0 %(χ2=4.897,P<0.05)。研究组手术时间明显长于对照组(t=7.329,P<0.05),但术中出血量显著少于对照组(t=12.230,P<0.05);两组骨折愈合时间比较差异无统计学意义(t=1.843,P>0.05)。研究组术后DASH评分、PRWE评分均明显低于对照组(t=10.196、5.771,均为P<0.05)。术后1年,研究组患者腕关节掌屈、背伸、桡偏、尺偏、旋前、旋后等活动范围及握力均优于对照组,两组间各项指标比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

对桡骨远端骨折患者应用腕关节镜辅助下切开复位内固定术治疗效果显著,可促进骨折愈合,尽快改善患者上肢功能及腕关节功能,提高腕关节活动度。

Objective

To study the effect of wrist arthroscopy assisted open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of distal radius fractures.

Methods

This study was a prospective study. A total of 82 patients with distal radius fracture who were treated in Mianyang Orthopedic Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were selected as the study subjects, all the patients were diagnosed as distal radius fractures by wrist joint CT and X-ray. Association for the Study of Internal Fixation(AO)classification was type C fracture, which was caused by trauma, involving articular surface and unilateral injury. Patients with old fracture, severe osteoporosis and other fractures, abnormal function of important organs and mental illness were excluded.According to random number table method, the patients were divided into study group (n=42) and control group (n=40), in which the study group received carpal arthroscopic assisted open reduction and internal fixation, and the control group received traditional open reduction and plate internal fixation.The clinical efficacy of the two groups was evaluated, and the difference was compared by chi square test. The intraoperative indexes and fracture healing time of the two groups were recorded or counted, and the range of motion of wrist joint was measured before and one year after the operation in the two groups. The upper limb function assessment scale (DASH) and wrist joint self assessment scale (PRWE) were used to evaluate the upper limb function and wrist joint function of the two groups before and one year after the operation, and the data were collected t test was used to compare the difference of measurement data between groups.

Results

The excellent and good rate of the study group was 92.9%, which was much higher than that of the control group (75.0%) (χ2=4.897, P<0.05). The operation time of the study group was significantly longer than that of the control group(t=7.329, P<0.05), but the intraoperative hemorrhage was significantly less than that of the control group (t=12.230, P<0.05); there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups (t=1.843, P>0.05). The scores of DASH and PRWE in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (t=10.196, 5.771, both P<0.05). One year after the operation, the range of motion of wrist in palmar flexion, back extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, pronation, supination, and the grip strength of the patients in the study group were better than those in the control group, and there were significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The open reduction and internal fixation with the assistance of wrist arthroscope is effective in the treatment of distal radius fracture, which can promote fracture healing, improve the function of upper limb and wrist joint as soon as possible, and improve the mobility of wrist joint.

表1 桡骨远端骨折患者一般资料对比
表2 桡骨远端骨折患者临床疗效对比[例(%)]
表3 两组桡骨远端骨折患者手术情况及愈合时间比较(±s)
表4 两组桡骨远端骨折患者术前术后DASH和PRWE评分比较[分,(±s)]
表5 两组桡骨远端骨折患者术前术后腕关节活动度及握力比较(±s)
图1 桡骨远端骨折患者左腕关节术前X线片及术中腕关节情况。图A为术前左腕关节正位X线片,示桡骨远端关节面不平整,台阶超过2 mm,尺偏角变小;图B术前左腕关节侧位X片,示桡骨远端掌倾角变为负角;图C术中左腕关节斜位X线片,示桡骨远端掌倾角恢复正常;图D术中左腕关节侧位X线片,示桡骨远端掌倾角恢复正常;图E术中关节镜下复位前左桡腕关节,示桡骨远端关节面骨折,软骨面不平整;图F术中左腕关节正位X线片,示桡骨远端关节面平整,桡骨高度及尺偏角恢复正常;图G术中复位时的左桡腕关节,示腕关节镜下撬拨复位
[1]
Lindau T. Arthroscopic evaluation of associated Soft tissue injuries in distal radius fractures[J]. Hand Clin, 2017,33(4): 651-658.
[2]
Ma C, Deng Q, Pu H, et al. External fixation is more suitable for intra-articular fractures of the distal radius in elderly patients[J]. Bone Res, 2016, 4(1): 39-47.
[3]
Wang JH, Sun T. Comparison of effects of seven treatment methods for distal radius fracture on minimizing complex regional pain syndrome[J]. Arch Med Sci, 2017, 13(1): 163-173.
[4]
赵玲珑,贾晶,郑文,等.关节镜辅助切开复位内固定治疗AO-C型桡骨远端骨折及关节内损伤[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(3):317-318.
[5]
叶钢,肖兢,汪洲,等.腕关节镜辅助下桡骨远端C型骨折有限切开复位内固定的临床疗效评价[J].中华手外科杂志,2018,34(1):4-6.
[6]
杨国,罗琦,陈杲.腕关节镜辅助下微创手术与切开复位内固定治疗不稳定性桡骨远端骨折的效果观察[J].中国医学创新,2020,17(34):74-77.
[7]
Demirba ER, Ura AA, Kaya I, et al. Volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures[J].Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2012,18(2):162-166.
[8]
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG)[J]. Am J Ind Med, 1996, 29(6): 602-608.
[9]
John M, Angst F, Awiszus F, et al. The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE): cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties[J].Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2008,26(6):1047-1058.
[10]
Vosbikian MM, Ketonis C, Huang R, et al. Optimal positioning for volar plate fixation of a distal radius fracture[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2015, 47(1): 235-244.
[11]
Naito K, Zemirline A, Sugiyama Y, et al. Possibility of fixation of a distal radius fracture with a volar locking plate through a 10 mm approach[J]. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg, 2016, 20(2): 71-76.
[12]
柯巍,李珂,王思博,等.切开复位钢板内固定与闭合复位外固定支架固定治疗桡骨远端骨折:评分及线性回归分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2019, 23(8):1196-1202.
[13]
赵鲁京,潘朝晖,吴倩,等.切开复位内固定与闭合复位外固定支架固定治疗A2,A3型桡骨远端骨折疗效比较[J].潍坊医学院学报,2017,39(3):205-207.
[14]
肖亮,孙晨,孙志波,等.不同手术方式治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效比较[J].局解手术学杂志,2019,28(5):62-66.
[15]
陆剑锋,陆飞伟,崔志浩,等.传统手术及腕关节镜微创治疗不稳定性桡骨远端骨折的临床比较[J].重庆医科大学学报,2019,44(5):683-688.
[16]
叶钢,肖兢,汪洲,等.腕关节镜辅助下桡骨远端C型骨折有限切开复位内固定的临床疗效评价[J].中华手外科杂志,2018,34(1):4-6.
[17]
窦邦现,李红卫,白晨平,等.微创腕关节镜辅助下治疗桡骨远端关节内粉碎性骨折的临床分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2019,21(3):210-213.
[18]
方凯彬,王文怀.腕关节镜辅助治疗关节内桡骨远端骨折的早期疗效观察[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2019,33(2):138-143.
[19]
程亚博,杨顺. 腕关节镜辅助下切开复位经骨窗植骨内固定治疗桡骨远端Die-punch骨折[J].中国骨伤,2019, 32(8):731-735.
[20]
Shih J. Arthroscopic-assisted treatment for athletes with distal radius fractures[J]. Chir Main, 2015, 34(6): 397-398.
[21]
Lutz M, Erhart S, Deml C, et al. Arthroscopically assisted osteosynthesis of intraarticular distal radius fractures[J]. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2016, 28(4): 279-290.
[1] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[2] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[3] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[4] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[5] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[8] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[9] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[10] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[11] 陆镜明, 韩大为, 任耀星, 黄天笑, 向俊西, 张谞丰, 吕毅, 王傅民. 基于术前影像组学的肝内胆管细胞癌淋巴结转移预测的系统性分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 852-858.
[12] 刘琦, 王守凯, 王帅, 苏雨晴, 马壮, 陈海军, 司丕蕾. 乳腺癌肿瘤内微生物组的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 841-845.
[13] 于洁, 金小红, 顾艳楣, 王慧, 葛杨杨, 李燕. 癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症患者疾病体验与需求的质性研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 739-744.
[14] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
[15] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
阅读次数
全文
3
HTML PDF
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版 最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 1 0 0 2

  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 2 1
  比例 67% 33%

摘要
184
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 184
  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 78 106
  比例 42% 58%