切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 1 -6. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.01.001

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

髋关节置换术后持续疼痛的因素与风险模型
林勇1, 杜庆钧2, 罗江1, 曾秋涛2, 叶前驱1, 李绪辉1, 冯杰荣1, 周驰3,()   
  1. 1. 528000 佛山,广东医科大学附属第三医院骨科
    2. 528000 佛山,南方医科大学顺德医院创伤、关节外科
    3. 510405 广州中医药大学第一附属医院三骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-10 出版日期:2021-02-01
  • 通信作者: 周驰

Study on influencing factors and risk prediction model of persistent pain after primary hip replacement

Yong Lin1, Qingjun Du2, Jiang Luo1, Qiutao Zeng2, Qianqu Ye1, Xuhui Li1, Jierong Feng1, Chi Zhou3,()   

  1. 1. Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Foshan 528000, China
    2. Trauma and Joint Surgery, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan 528000, China
    3. The Third Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
  • Received:2020-04-10 Published:2021-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Chi Zhou
引用本文:

林勇, 杜庆钧, 罗江, 曾秋涛, 叶前驱, 李绪辉, 冯杰荣, 周驰. 髋关节置换术后持续疼痛的因素与风险模型[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 1-6.

Yong Lin, Qingjun Du, Jiang Luo, Qiutao Zeng, Qianqu Ye, Xuhui Li, Jierong Feng, Chi Zhou. Study on influencing factors and risk prediction model of persistent pain after primary hip replacement[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 1-6.

目的

探讨影响初次髋关节置换术后持续疼痛的危险因素,并探索一种预测其风险的模型。

方法

纳入随访时间≥6个月初次行髋关节置换术且资料齐全的患者,并排除术后发生深部感染或合并骨盆骨折或其他多关节损伤,或存在其他疾病可导致髋关节周围疼痛的患者,最后一共选择2017年1月至2019年12月在3家医院初次行髋关节置换术标准的病例475例作为研究对象。通过电子病历系统收集患者临床资料,检索国内外相关文献并结合临床,选取可能与初次髋关节置换术后发生持续疼痛相关的危险因素纳入研究。选取其中342例病例作为研究对象,进行相关风险因素分析及风险预测模型的建立,其中单因素分析采用卡方检验,多因素分析采用logistic分析。之后将模型应用于临床实际,对剩下的133例患者进行评估,结果采用受试者工作特征(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)进行统计分析,对该风险预测模型的鉴别效度和预测能力进行评价。

结果

多因素logistic分析结果显示年龄≥75岁、身体质量指数(BMI)、糖尿病史、置换类型、术中出血量、下肢静脉血栓、术后C反应蛋白(CRP)≥10 mg/L是影响初次髋关节置换术后持续疼痛的独立危险因素,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对这些因素使用logistic回归分析构建出风险预测模型:yeLogit(P)/[1+eLogit(P)],其中y为发生持续疼痛的概率,e为指数函数。用模型对患者进行评估后显示模型总正确率为72.18%,并通过ROC曲线评价该模型的鉴别效度,结果显示:AUC=0.863,敏感度为92.86%,特异度为62.86%。

结论

初次髋关节置换术后持续性疼痛的影响因素主要为年龄≥75岁、BMI、糖尿病史、置换类型、术中出血量、下肢静脉血栓、术后CRP≥10 mg/L;根据上述影响因素构建出的风险预测模型对初次髋关节置换术后发生持续疼痛风险预测具有良好的判别能力,但是仍然需要通过前瞻性研究进行进一步的确认。

Objective

To explore the risk factors of persistent pain after primary hip replacement and to develop a model for predicting the risk.

Methods

According to the inclusion criteria (follow-up time≥six months and completed data of primary hip replace ment) and exclusion criteria(postoperative deep infection, combining pelvic fractures or other multiple joints injuries and diseases), 475 patients receiving primary hip arthroplasty in three hospitals from January 2017 to December 2019 were selected as the research subjects. The clinical data of patients was collected through the electronic medical record system, and the relevant literatures at home and abroad were retrieved and combined with clinical practice. The risk factors that might be associated with persistent pain after primary hip arthroplasty were selected for the study. Among them, 342 cases were selected, and related risk factor analysis and risk prediction model were established. Chi-square test was used for univariate analysis, and logistic analysis was used for multivariate analysis. The model was applied to clinical practice and the remaining 133 patients were evaluated. The results were analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate the differential validity and predictive power of the risk prediction model.

Results

Multi-factor logistic analysis showed that age≥75 years, body mass index (BMI), history of diabetes, displacement type, intraoperative blood loss, lower limb vein thrombosis and postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP)≥10 mg/L were the independent risk factors for the development of continuous pain after total hip arthroplasty (P<0.05). The risk prediction model for these factors was as follows: y=eLogit(P)/[1+ eLogit(P))], in which y is the probability of persistent pain and e is an exponential function. After evaluating the patients with the model, the total accuracy of the model was 72.18%. The differential validity of the model was evaluated by ROC curve, and the results showed that the AUC was 0.863, the sensitivity was 92.86%, and the specificity was 62.86%.

Conclusions

The major influencing factors for persistent pain after primary total hip arthroplasty are the age≥75 years, BMI, diabetes mellitus, the displacement type, intraoperative blood loss, lower limb vein thrombosis and postoperative CRP≥10 mg/L. The risk prediction model constructed according to the above influencing factors has good discriminant ability for the risk prediction of persistent pain after primary hip replacement, but still needs further confirmation by prospective study.

表1 发生持续疼痛危险因素的单因素分析结果(n=342)
表2 发生持续疼痛危险因素赋值表
表3 发生持续疼痛危险因素的多因素logistic回归分析结果(n=342)
图1 发生持续疼痛风险预测模型的ROC曲线
[1]
王俏杰,张先龙.人工髋关节置换术的现状与热点[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(6):718-724.
[2]
黄秀军,陈红云,翁叶红,等.中西医结合护理对髋关节置换术疼痛干预的效果观察[J].中国医学创新,2018,15(24):99-102.
[3]
程兴旺,张峡.髋膝关节置换术后假体周围持续性疼痛[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2014,8(5):673-676.
[4]
徐小会,王桂新,贺文建,等.全髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的短期疗效随访[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(5):594-599.
[5]
陈海聪,林颢,吴夏蕾,等. 179例老年股骨颈骨折临床特点及危险因素分析[J]. 广东医科大学学报,2020,38(5):569-572.
[6]
万江.延续性护理对髋关节置换术老年患者术后疼痛缓解及髋关节功能恢复的作用[J].上海护理,2019,19(8):34-37.
[7]
孙元丽. 循证医学模式对高龄股骨颈骨折患者术后康复时间及并发症的影响[J]. 现代临床医学,2020,46(1):21-23.
[8]
贺华.中医护理干预在改善老年髋关节置换术患者术后疼痛和心理状态中的应用[J].光明中医,2019,34(3):478-480.
[9]
董晓莉,陈文月,戴进.初次全髋关节置换术患者术后夜间疼痛相关因素分析[J].中国医药,2019,14(12):1858-1861.
[10]
葛均波,徐永健,王辰著.内科学第9版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:764.
[11]
徐闯,刘明廷,尚义美,等.肥胖对初次人工全髋关节置换术临床疗效影响的Meta分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(13):1203-1209.
[12]
Elgeidi A, Elganainy AE, Abou Elkhier N, et al. Interleukin-6 and other inflammatory markers in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection[J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(12): 2591-2595.
[13]
叶宗伟,杨毅宁. 血清C反应蛋白、白蛋白及其比值在炎症相关性疾病中的进展[J]. 医学综述,2017,23(20):3979-3983.
[14]
王怀云,郭文荣,洪志群,等.全髋关节置换术出血量分析及控制出血对策[J].福州总医院学报,2011,18(4):228-229.
[15]
毛乐成. 氨甲环酸减少全髋关节置换术中出血和输血效果观察及对术后关节功能恢复的影响[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2017,28(17):3196-3197.
[16]
李中华,高学良,沈红.全髋与半髋置换术治疗老年人股骨颈骨折疗效对比观察[J].当代医学,2019,25(7):148-150.
[17]
黄海清,李云.全髋与半髋置换术治疗老年人股骨颈骨折疗效对比分析[J].医学理论与实践,2018,31(24):3701-3702.
[18]
李纯勇.人工全髋与半髋置换术在老年股骨颈骨折治疗中的应用价值[J].当代医学,2019,25(3):7-9.
[19]
尹知训,余楠生,卢伟杰,等. 初始全髋关节置换术静脉血栓栓塞症预防的临床研究[J]. 中国骨与关节外科,2013,6(S1):57-60.
[20]
叶茂,常宁,梁苗苗,等.老年髋关节置换术患者下肢深静脉血栓的影响因素分析[J].实用骨科杂志,2020,26(1):4-7.
[21]
严缘园,周文娟. 术前以患者为中心开展健康教育及术后康复训练预防髋关节置换术患者下肢深静脉血栓形成的效果[J]. 血栓与止血学,2017,23(5):870-872.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[3] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[4] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[5] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[6] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[7] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[8] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[9] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[12] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15] 付庆鹏, 邓晓强, 高伟, 姜福民, 范永峰, 吴海贺, 齐岩松, 包呼日查, 徐永胜. 新型股骨测量定位器在全膝关节置换术中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 980-987.
阅读次数
全文


摘要