切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华关节外科杂志(电子版)

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 623 -626. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.05.018

所属专题： 文献；

临床经验

关节镜下双排锚钉缝线桥技术治疗肱骨大结节骨折
卞为伟1, 唐晓波1,†(), 王健1, 莫向荣1, 张浩1, 孙健2   
  1. 1. 224700　建湖，南通大学附属建湖医院
    2. 201800　上海市第一人民医院嘉定分院
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-05 出版日期:2020-10-01
  • 通信作者: 唐晓波
  • 基金资助:
    南通大学临床医学专项项目(2019LY038)

Arthroscopic double-row anchor suture bridge technique in treatment of humeral greater tuberosity fractures

Weiwei Bian1, Xiaobo Tang1,†(), Jian Wang1, Xiangrong Mo1, Hao Zhang1, Jian Sun2   

  1. 1. Affiliated Jianhu Hospital of Nantong University, Jianhu 224700, China
    2. Jiading Branch of Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai 201800, China
  • Received:2018-12-05 Published:2020-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaobo Tang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tang Xiaobo, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

卞为伟, 唐晓波, 王健, 莫向荣, 张浩, 孙健. 关节镜下双排锚钉缝线桥技术治疗肱骨大结节骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 623-626.

Weiwei Bian, Xiaobo Tang, Jian Wang, Xiangrong Mo, Hao Zhang, Jian Sun. Arthroscopic double-row anchor suture bridge technique in treatment of humeral greater tuberosity fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 623-626.

目的

探讨关节镜下双排锚钉缝线桥固定技术治疗肱骨大结节撕脱性骨折的疗效。

方法

随访2013年3月至2017年3月在南通大学附属建湖医院骨科接受治疗的骨折移位大于5 mm、骨折块面积小于3 × 3 cm，无其他损伤(如：肩袖损伤、SLAP损伤、Bankart损伤)的单纯肱骨大结节撕脱性骨折的且接受关节镜下双排锚钉缝线桥固定技术治疗的患者23例。收集患者末次随访的关节活动度、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分等数据资料。采用配对样本t检验对术前术后关节活动度、VAS评分、ASES评分进行比较。

结果

所有患者均在3个月内实现骨性愈合。肩关节前屈活动度由术前(92.4±15.3)°提高至术后(148.7±15.3)°(t＝9.956，P<0.01)，外展活动度由术前(85.0±12.6)°提高至术后(147.3±14.4)°(t＝15.502，P<0.01)；外旋活动度由术前(21.5±10.2)°提高至术后(30.7±11.8)°(t＝12.058，P<0.01); VAS评分比术前降低(Z＝4.107，P<0.01); ASES评分由术前(29.7±6.1)分提高至术后(91.8±4.1)分(t＝41.879，P<0.01)。

结论

关节镜下双排锚钉缝线桥技术治疗单纯性肱骨大结节撕脱性骨折效果确切，手术创伤小、恢复快、术后肩关节功能恢复良好。

关键词: 肩关节, 肩骨折, 内固定器, 关节镜
Objective

To explore the effect of arthroscopic double-row anchor suture bridge fixation technique in the treatment of avulsion fracture of the humeral greater tuberosity.

Methods

Twenty-three patients who underwent arthroscopic double-row anchor suture bridge fixation in Nantong University Affiliated Jianhu Hospital from March 2013 to March 2017 were followed up. The displacement of humeral tuberosity fracture in these patients was more than 5 mm, and the area of fracture fragment was less than 3 cm ×3 cm. There was no other injury, such as rotator cuff injury, superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP)injury, or Bankart injury. Range of motion, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score were collected during the last follow-up. Paired sample t test or rank sum test was used to compare the data before and after operation.

Results

Bone healing was achieved in all the patients within three months. Shoulder flexion mobility increased from preoperative(92.4±15.3)° to postoperative (148.7±15.3)°(t=9.956, P<0.01). Abduction activity increased from preoperative (85.0±12.6)° to postoperative (147.3±14.4)°(t=15.502, P<0.01. External rotation activity increased from preoperative (21.5±10.2)° to postoperative (30.7±11.8)°(t =12.058, P<0.01). The VAS scores decreased compared to the preoperative ones (Z=4.107, P<0.01). ASES score increased from preoperative (29.7±6.1) to postoperative (91.8±4.1)(t =41.879, P<0.01).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic double-row anchor suture bridge technique is effective in the treatment of simple avulsion fracture of greater tubercle of humerus, with minimal trauma, rapid recovery and good functional recovery of shoulder joint.

Key words: Shoulder joint, Shoulder fractures, Internal fixator, Arthroscopes
表1 手术前后肩关节活动度、VAS及ASES的比较(n＝23)
  前屈[°，(±s)] 外展[°，(±s)] 外旋[°，(±s)] VAS [M(P25，P 75)] ASES(±s)
术前 92.4±15.3 85.0±12.6 21.5±10.2 7.8(5.6，9.0) 29.7±6.1
术后 148.7±15.3 147.3±14.4 30.7±11.8 0.7(0.1，1.1) 91.8±4.1
统计值 t＝9.956 t＝15.502 t＝12.058 Z＝4.107 t＝41.879
P值 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
[1]
Green A, Izzi J. Isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2003, 12(6): 641-649.
[2]
Bahrs C, Lingenfelter E, Fischer F, et al. Mechanism of injury and morphology of the greater tuberosity fracture[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2006, 15(2): 140-147.
[3]
Taverna E, Sansone V, Battistella F. Arthroscopic treatment for greater tuberosity fractures: rationale and surgical technique[J]. Arthroscopy, 2004, 20(6): e53-e57.
[4]
Park TS, Choi IY, Kim YH, et al. A new suggestion for the treatment of minimally displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus[J]. Bull Hosp Jt Dis, 1997, 56(3): 171-176.
[5]
Ji JH, Shafi M, Song IS, et al. Arthroscopic fixation technique for comminuted, displaced greater tuberosity fracture[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(5): 600-609.
[6]
Pujol N, Fong O, Scharycki S, et al. Simultaneous arthroscopic treatment of displaced greater tuberosity and glenoid fracture using a double-row technique[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2009, 17(12): 1508-1510.
[7]
Han SH, Oh KS, Han KJ, et al. Accuracy of measuring tape and vertebral-level methods to determine shoulder internal rotation[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(2): 562-566.
[8]
Angst F, Hans-Kaspar S, Aeschlimann A, et al. Measures of adult shoulder function: disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society Standardized Shoulder[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2011, 63(S11): S174-S188.
[9]
Kim E, Shin HK, Kim CH. Characteristics of an isolated greater tuberosity fracture of the humerus[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2005, 10(5): 441-444.
[10]
Platzer P, Thalhammer G, Oberleitner G, et al. Displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment[J]. J Trauma, 2008, 65(4): 843-848.
[11]
Chowdary U, Prasad H, Subramanyam PK. Outcome of locking compression plating for proximal humeral fractures: a prospective study[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2014, 22(1): 4-8.
[12]
Park SE, Ji JH, Shafi M, et al. Arthroscopic management of occult greater tuberosity fracture of the shoulder[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2014, 24(4): 475-482.
[13]
Sano H, Tokunaga M, Noguchi M, et al. Tight medial knot tying May increase retearing risk after transosseous equivalent repair of rotator cuff tendon[J]. Biomed Mater Eng, 2017, 28(3): 267-277.
[14]
Ji JH, Moon CY, Kim YY, et al. Arthroscopic fixation for a malunited greater tuberosity fracture using the suture-bridge technique: technical report and literature review[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2009, 17(12): 1473-1476.
[15]
Burkhart SS, Cole BJ. Bridging self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair: we really are doing better[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(5): 677-680.
[1] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[2] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[3] 肖志满, 龚煜, 谢景凌, 刘斌伟. 上下肢关节镜手术后患者下肢深静脉血栓发生的对比研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 601-606.
[4] 杨国栋, 张辉, 郭珈, 曲迪, 张静, 戚超. 外侧半月板后角撕裂是否修复的术后疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[5] 马鹏程, 刘伟, 张思平. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜手术中闭合关节囊的疗效影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 653-662.
[6] 陈宏兴, 张立军, 张勇, 李虎, 周驰, 凡一诺. 膝骨关节炎关节镜清理术后中药外用疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 663-672.
[7] 邢阳, 何爱珊, 康焱, 杨子波, 孟繁钢, 邬培慧. 前交叉韧带单束联合前外侧结构重建的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 508-519.
[8] 吴俊贤, 曾俊杰, 许有银, 苑博. 体外冲击波疗法辅助治疗肩袖修补术后关节僵硬[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 571-576.
[9] 齐伟亚, 方杰, 吴衡, 刘波. 掌侧小切口联合腕关节镜治疗AO－C型桡骨远端骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 577-582.
[10] 邬春虎, 马玉海, 陈长松, 尹华东, 朱晓峰, 何剑星, 刘彧. 冲击波联合富血小板血浆对骨关节炎软骨损伤的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 334-339.
[11] 杨大威, 张鑫. 肩关节上方悬吊复合体损伤研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 193-197.
[12] 龙珂, 戴祝, 刘全辉. 关节镜下肩袖修补联合喙突成形治疗肩袖撕裂合并喙突下囊肿[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 198-203.
[13] 郑翰, 丁国强, 谢鹏, 卢冰. 切开Latarjet手术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的随访研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 204-211.
[14] 黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊, 王磊, 孙鲁宁. 关节镜下带线锚钉修补术治疗Ⅴ型SLAP损伤临床观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 218-223.
[15] 张镇斌, 闫兆龙, 王功腾, 张文琦, 王旭凤, 李广兴, 孙华强, 李树锋. 关节镜对胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的效果研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 218-225.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号