切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 504 -507. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.04.020

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

股神经阻滞下手法松解术治疗全膝关节置换术后僵硬
高升焘1, 万连平1,(), 张鹏1, 林均馨1, 杜建春1, 刘泽淼1   
  1. 1. 266035 青岛,山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)关节外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-18 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 万连平

Manipulation of knee stiffness under femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty

Shengtao Gao1, Lianping Wan1,(), Peng Zhang1, Junxin Lin1, Jianchun Du1, Zemiao Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Joint Surgery, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Qingdao 266035, China
  • Received:2019-02-18 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Lianping Wan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wan Lianping, Email:
引用本文:

高升焘, 万连平, 张鹏, 林均馨, 杜建春, 刘泽淼. 股神经阻滞下手法松解术治疗全膝关节置换术后僵硬[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 504-507.

Shengtao Gao, Lianping Wan, Peng Zhang, Junxin Lin, Jianchun Du, Zemiao Liu. Manipulation of knee stiffness under femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 504-507.

目的

探讨股神经神经阻滞镇痛下手法松解术治疗全膝关节置换术后僵硬的临床疗效。

方法

自2013年1月至2017年12月,山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)关节外科32例全膝关节置换术后僵硬的患者纳入本研究。在B超引导下连续股神经阻滞镇痛后行手法松解术,松解完毕后患者行主被动功能康复锻炼。记录术前及术后膝关节的屈曲度、美国膝关节学会评分(KSS)及功能锻炼时的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分。所得计量资料采用配对t检验。

结果

32例患者平均随访(20.4±3.1)周。松解前膝关节主动屈曲度平均(70.0±10. 8)°,松解后末次随访主动屈曲度平均(106.4±7.9)°,平均改善(36.9±7.5)°(t=-28.5,P<0.05)。松解前KSS评分平均(78.3±2.3)分,松解后末次随访KSS评分平均(88.3±2.7)分,差异具有统计学意义(t=-27.1,P<0.05)。功能锻炼时VAS评分平均(4.5±1.1)分,为中度疼痛。随访无假体周围骨折、伸膝装置损伤、异位骨化等并发症。

结论

股神经神经阻滞镇痛下手法松解术能有效改善全膝关节置换术后僵硬,缓解患者功能锻炼时的疼痛,具有良好的临床效果和较低的并发症。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of manipulation under femoral nerve block analgesia in the treatment of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

During January 2013 to December 2017, 32 patients with stiffness after total knee arthroplasty were enrolled in this study. Ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block were performed, followed by manipulation with passive knee flexion to the maximum extent, and functional rehabilitation exercises performed after manipulation. The knee flexion angle before and after manipulation, KSS scores and VAS scores during functional exercise were recorded.

Results

Thirty-two patients were followed up for (20.4±3.1) weeks on average. The knee flexion angle was mean of (70.0±10.8)° before manipulation, the knee flexion angle was (106.4±7.9) ° on average at the last follow-up after manipulation under femoral nerve block analgesia(t=-28.5, P<0.05). The average improvement angle was (36.9±7.5)°. The average KSS score was (78.3±2.3) before manipulation, and was (88.3±2.7) at the last follow-up(t=-27.1, P<0.05). The VAS score during functional exercise was (4.5±1.1) on average, which was moderate pain. The patients were no periprosthetic fracture, extensor mechanism disruption or heterotopic ossification.

Conclusion

Manipulation was performed on patients with stiffness after knee arthroplasty under femoral nerve block analgesia can effectively improved knee function, and reduce the pain during manipulation.

图1 B超引导下行股神经阻滞镇痛
图2 股神经阻滞麻醉镇痛成功后行手法松解术
表1 松解前后膝关节屈曲度及KSS评分对比[n=32,(±s)]
[1]
Tibbo ME, Limberg AK, Salib CG, et al. Acquired idiopathic stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2019, 101(14):1320-1330.
[2]
Cohen JS, Gu A, Lopez NS, Park MS, et al. Efficacy of revision surgery for the treatment of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty:a systematic review[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(9):3049-3055.
[3]
Hug KT, Amanatullah DF, Huddleston JI 3rd, et al. Protocol-driven revision for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty improves motion and clinical outcomes[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(9):2952-2955.
[4]
Kim J, Nelson CL, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86(7):1479-1484.
[5]
Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years? [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(9):1774-1778.
[6]
Haller JM, Holt DC, Mcfadden ML, et al. Arthrofibrosis of the knee following a fracture of the tibial plateau [J]. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97-B(1):109-114.
[7]
Vigdorchik JM, Sharma AK, Feder OI, et al. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: is it a result of spinal deformity? [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(6S):S330-S335.
[8]
Manrique J, Gomez MM, Parvizi J. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2015,28(2):119-126.
[9]
林祥波,吴海山,祝云利,等.关节镜治疗初次全膝关节置换术后关节僵硬的临床分析[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2009,3(2):148-152.
[10]
Lum ZC, Shieh AK, Dorr LD. Why total knees fail--a modern perspective review[J]. World J Orthop, 2018, 9(4):60-64.
[11]
Schairer WW, Vail TP, Bozic KJ. What are the rates and causes of hospital readmission after total knee arthroplasty?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1):181-187.
[12]
Schwarzkopf R, William A, Deering RM, et al. Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for stiff total knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthopedics, 2013, 36(12):e1544-e1548.
[13]
Desai A S, Karmegam A, Dramis A, et al. Manipulation for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: when and how often to do it? [J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2014, 24(7):1291-1295.
[14]
Czamara A, Kuz'niecow M, Królikowska A. Arthrofibrosis of the knee joint - the current state of knowledge. Literature review [J]. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 2019, 21(2):95-106.
[15]
Cheuy VA, Foran JR, Paxton RJ, et al. Arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 32(8):968-969.
[1] 王振宇, 张洪美, 荆琳, 何名江, 闫奇. 膝骨关节炎相关炎症因子与血浆代谢物间的因果关系及中介效应[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 467-473.
[2] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[3] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[4] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[9] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[10] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[11] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[12] 宋庆成, 郑占乐, 王天瑞, 王宇钏, 张凯旋, 纳静, 蔚佳昊, 杨思繁, 宋九宏, 张英泽. “人老膝不老”:膝关节健康管理的全方位探索与实践[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 321-324.
[13] 郑占乐, 王宇钏, 蔚佳昊, 宋庆成, 张凯旋, 纳静, 王天瑞, 宋九宏, 张英泽, 王娟. 保膝须“开膝”——“开膝”在膝骨关节炎中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 325-330.
[14] 王松雷, 张贻良, 孟浩, 宋威, 白林晨, 袁心, 张辉. 股骨前髁预截骨髓外定位技术在全膝关节置换术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 811-819.
[15] 刘芳明, 石秀秀, 唐冲, 张克石, 徐影, 王桂杉, 关振鹏, 李晓. 骨科康复患者对数字疗法应用的知晓度和需求度:一项基于928 份问卷调查结果分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 654-661.
阅读次数
全文


摘要