切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 320 -323. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.03.011

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

复杂胫骨平台骨折双切口双钢板内固定术的疗效
丁伟1,(), 王小军1, 封小东1   
  1. 1. 225411 泰兴市第二人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-16 出版日期:2020-06-01
  • 通信作者: 丁伟

Effect of double incision double plates internal fixation on complex tibia plateau fractures

Wei Ding1,(), Xiaoojun Wang1, Xiaodong Feng1   

  1. 1. Taixing Second People’s Hospital orthopaedics, Taixing 225411, China
  • Received:2019-09-16 Published:2020-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Wei Ding
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ding Wei, Email:
引用本文:

丁伟, 王小军, 封小东. 复杂胫骨平台骨折双切口双钢板内固定术的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 320-323.

Wei Ding, Xiaoojun Wang, Xiaodong Feng. Effect of double incision double plates internal fixation on complex tibia plateau fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 320-323.

目的

探讨复杂胫骨平台骨折患者进行膝关节内外侧双切口双钢板复位内固定术治疗的临床疗效。

方法

选取2016年2月至2018年5月泰兴市第二人民医院收治的均符合复杂胫骨平台骨折诊断标准、且不存在其他部位骨折的患者64例为研究对象。根据手术方式的不同分为研究组(29例)和对照组(35例),其中对照组患者给予单侧锁定钢板内固定术治疗,研究组患者给予膝关节内外侧双切口双钢板复位内固定术治疗。分别采用卡方检验和t检验对两组患者术后恢复优良率、手术相关指标及术后愈合时间进行统计分析,并对比术后6个月及1年Rasmussen膝关节评分、胫骨平台后倾角度数及胫骨平台内翻角度数,并观察两组患者并发症发生情况。

结果

研究组患者的优良率显著较对照组升高(χ2=12.874,P<0.05);研究组与对照组患者术中出血量、手术时间、切口长度对比无显著差异(P>0.05),研究组患者的骨折愈合时间、开始下地负重时间及开始锻炼时间显著较对照组缩短(t=8.327、10.528、13.539,均为P<0.05)。术后6个月及术后1年,研究组患者的Rasmussen膝关节评分显著高于对照组(t=7.04、6.60,均为P<0.05);术后1年,对照组患者胫骨平台后倾角及内翻角度数显著高于研究组(t=-2.22、-7.63,均为P<0.05);研究组患者的并发症总发生率显著低于对照组(t=10.326,P<0.05)。

结论

复杂胫骨平台骨折患者进行膝关节内外侧双切口双钢板复位内固定术治疗疗效显著,能够有效促进患者恢复,降低术后并发症,值得临床推广。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of double incision double plate reduction and internal fixation on the internal and external sides of knee joint in patients with complex tibia plateau fracture.

Methods

From February 2016 to may 2018, 64 patients who met the diagnostic criteria of complex tibial plateau fractures and did not have fractures in other parts were selected. According to the different operation methods, they were divided into the study group (29 cases) and the control group (35 cases). The patients in the control group were treated with unilateral locking plate internal fixation, while the patients in the study group were treated with knee joint internal fixation. The follow-up observation was carried out at six months and one year after the operation. Chi-square test was used to analyze the excellent and good rate of postoperative recovery and the complications, operation related indexes, postoperative healing time, Rasmussen knee joint score, tibial plateau angulation degree and tibial plateau angulation degree of the two groups were compared by t test.

Results

The excellent rate of the patients in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (χ2=12.874, P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the study group and the control group in the amount of intraoperative bleeding, operation time or incision length (P>0.05). The fracture healing time, the time of starting weight-bearing and the time of starting exercise of the study group were significantly shorter than the control group (t =8.327, 10.528, 13.539, P<0.05). Six months and one year after operation, the Rasmussen knee joint score of the study group was significantly higher than the control group (t=7.04, 6.60, P<0.05). One year later, the tibial plateau caster angle and the degree of varus angle in the control group were significantly higher than that in the study group (t=-2.22, -7.63, P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (t=10.326, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The effect of double-incision double plates internal fixation on the internal and external sides of knee joint is remarkable in complex tibia plateau fractures, which can effectively promote the recovery and reduce postoperative complications, and is worthy of clinical application.

表1 两组患者临床疗效对比[n(%)]
表2 手术相关指标及术后骨折愈合时间对比(±s)
表3 两组患者术后6个月及术后1年膝关节恢复情况(±s)
表4 两组患者并发症发生率对比[例(%)]
[1]
高中昌.复杂胫骨平台骨折采取双切口双钢板内固定、单侧锁定钢板内固定治疗的效果探究[J/CD].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2017,5(26): 142-143.
[2]
李世芳,孙健,周道政.双切口双钢板及锁定钢板内固定修复胫骨平台骨折的稳定性比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,30(26): 4179-4184.
[3]
Brandt F, Thvilum M, Almind D, et al. Hyperthyroidism and psychiatric morbidity:evidence from a Danish nationwide register study[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2014, 170(2): 341-348.
[4]
巴雪峰,孙改生,凯瑟尔,等.胫骨平台骨折的治疗新进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2012,20(12): 1104-1107.
[5]
唐国能,黄粹业,蒋永益,等.锁定钢板内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效观察[J].现代生物医学进展,2014,14(21): 4095-4097, 4102.
[6]
王璐,谷雨.锁定钢板与双切口双钢板内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折疗效观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2016,25(19): 2130-2132.
[7]
徐永发,姚志英.双切口双钢板内固定与单侧锁定钢板内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折患者的效果对比[J].医疗装备,2018,31(8): 97-98.
[8]
徐云钦,李强,申屠刚,等.复杂胫骨平台骨折手术时机与手术方式选择及疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(4): 320-323.
[9]
Garnavos C. Retropatellar nailing and condylar bolts for complex fractures of the tibial plateau: technique, pilot study and rationale[J]. Injury, 2014, 45(7): 1099-1104.
[10]
张贤亮.不同手术方法治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折临床疗效观察[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(8): 79-80.
[11]
杨光煦,刘启圣,欧阳传炜,等.膝内外侧双切口双钢板内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的效果分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2017,19(1): 26-29.
[12]
Molinaro E, Giani C, Agate L, et al. Patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who underwent radioiodine thyroid remnant ablation with low-activity 131I after either recombinant human TSH or thyroid hormone therapy withdrawal showed the same outcome after a 10-year follow-up[J]. J Clin Edocr Metab, 2013, 98(7): 2693-2700.
[13]
Kandemir U, Maclean J. Surgical approaches for tibial plateau fractures[J]. J Knee Surg, 2014, 27(1): 21-29.
[14]
Krettek C, Hawi N, Jagodzinski M, et al. Intracondylar segment osteotomy: correction of intra-articular malalignment after fracture of the tibial plateau[J]. Unfallchirurg, 2013, 116(5): 413-426.
[15]
邢彬,翁茂盛.锁定钢板与双切口双钢板内固定治疗复杂性胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较[J].中华全科医学,2015,13(2): 334-336.
[16]
黄海波,林作华,黄志伟.双切口双钢板内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效及对患肢负重时间的影响[J].海南医学,2019, 30(17).
[17]
杨宗酉,程晓东,朱炼,等.内侧和外侧锁定钢板固定SchatzkerⅥ型胫骨平台骨折的有限元分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2018, 20(2): 157-161.
[18]
赵阳,刘宇波.锁定钢板内固定术治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效及技巧探讨[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016, 20(17): 78-80.
[19]
王志刚.双切口双钢板及三切口三钢板内固定治疗双柱及三柱损伤的复杂胫骨平台骨折的研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2015, 24(9): 952-954.
[20]
李丹,王春喜.双钢板微创经皮固定技术治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2016, 22(5): 494-496.
[1] 曾敬, 吴冬冬, 邵明, 范震波, 王治国, 刘培谊, 兰海峰. 高龄髋部骨折患者不同手术时机的围手术期疗效评估[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[2] 赵飞鸿, 陈颖杰, 林静芳, 郑晓春, 廖燕凌. 超声引导下周围神经阻滞对髋膝关节置换术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 457-468.
[3] 贾杰, 王阳, 车凯薇, 高俊峰, 王聪, 李泽阳, 梁虎. 梭形针线扣技术与Krackow缝合法对跟腱止点或近止点断裂跟腱功能恢复的疗效比较[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 307-313.
[4] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[5] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[6] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[7] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[8] 王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.
[9] 翟刚, 邓修民, 岑川, 黄锋, 黄显壮, 王运成. 改良双通道吻合法在完全腹腔镜近端胃切除术中的临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 397-400.
[10] 郭倩, 张晓峰, 张鹏, 苏文博. “四步法”清扫No.253淋巴结在保留LCA的直肠癌根治术中的研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 411-414.
[11] 宫向良, 刘征, 丁梅. 基于膜解剖D2+CME根治术治疗胃癌的近中期随访研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 267-270.
[12] 张聃, 王毅, 冯文迪, 方兴中. 完整结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌对患者生存期的影响观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 279-282.
[13] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[14] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
[15] 陈先志, 许磊, 冯其柱, 王琦. 布地奈德联合复方异丙托溴铵雾化吸入在老年患者腹腔镜围手术期中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 531-536.
阅读次数
全文


摘要