切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 261 -265. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.03.001

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

锚钉固定位置与角度对肩关节前关节囊修复效果影响
区永亮1, 黄华扬1,(), 李凭跃1, 张涛1, 沈洪园1, 孔令闯1, 夏虹1   
  1. 1. 510010 广州,中国人民解放军南部战区总医院骨科医院,全军创伤骨科研究所,广东省骨科矫形技术及植入材料重点实验室,全军热区创伤救治与组织修复重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-28 出版日期:2020-06-01
  • 通信作者: 黄华扬
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2017B030314139); 国家自然科学基金(81871808); 广州市科技计划项目(201904010315)

Effect of anchor fixation position and angle on repair of anterior capsule of shoulder

Yongliang Ou1, Huayang Huang1,(), Pingyue Li1, Tao Zhang1, Hongyuan Shen1, Lingchuang Kong1, Hong Xia1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Traumatic Orthopaedics of PLA, Guangdong Key Lab of Orthopedic Technology and Implant, Key Laboratory of Trauma & Tissue Repair of Tropical Area of PLA, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA, Guangzhou 510010, China
  • Received:2020-02-28 Published:2020-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Huayang Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Huayang, Email:
引用本文:

区永亮, 黄华扬, 李凭跃, 张涛, 沈洪园, 孔令闯, 夏虹. 锚钉固定位置与角度对肩关节前关节囊修复效果影响[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 261-265.

Yongliang Ou, Huayang Huang, Pingyue Li, Tao Zhang, Hongyuan Shen, Lingchuang Kong, Hong Xia. Effect of anchor fixation position and angle on repair of anterior capsule of shoulder[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 261-265.

目的

探讨不同锚钉位置及角度对关节镜治疗复发性肩关节前向不稳临床疗效的影响。

方法

回顾性分析85例于2018年1月至12月因复发性肩关节前向不稳在南部战区总医院接受肩关节镜手术治疗的患者排除严重骨缺损、翻修等其他损伤。使用术后肩关节CT测量锚钉位置及插入角度,采用视觉模拟评分系统(VAS评分)及Rowe评分系统对患者术后关节疼痛程度、稳定性、活动度及功能进行综合评价。不同锚钉位置及角度与VAS评分及Rowe评分的关系使用独立样本t检验分析。

结果

在85例患者中,有57例患者的所有锚钉均在肩胛盂关节面上,28例患者的锚钉部分在肩胛盂关节面上,部分在肩胛盂边缘。两组的比较中,VAS评分差异无统计学意义(t =-0.829,P>0.05);所有锚钉均在肩胛盂关节面上的患者Rowe评分较高(t=-4.072,P<0.05)。通过术后Rowe评定分级对锚钉打入角度的反向比较中,2点、3点、4点和5点钟4个位点对应锚钉角度之间的比较均无统计学差异(t=0.312、0.885、0.775、0.934,均为P>0.05)。

结论

肩关节镜下缝合锚钉在合理插入角度范围内固定于肩胛盂边缘稍内侧的关节面上可以使复发性肩关节前向不稳的患者获得更好的近期疗效,而远期疗效需要进一步深入研究。

Objective

To investigate different suture anchor placement and insertion angle affect efficacy of patients with anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on 85 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for Bankart lesions in General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA from January to December 2018. Severe bone defects, revision and other injuries were excluded. Postoperative CT was used to measure suture anchors’ placement and angle. Visual analog scale(VAS) and Rowe scores were used to comprehensively evaluate joint pain, stability, range of motion(ROM) and function at the last follow-up(range, 12-24 months). Independent sample t test was used to analyze the relationship between different anchor positions and angles and VAS and Rowe scores.

Results

The group with the anchor placed on the glenoid face contained 57 patients, and the group with anchor partially placed at the glenoid edge contained 28 patients. VAS calculated at follow-up showed no significantly difference between two groups (t=-0.829, P>0.05), but the group with the anchor placed on the glenoid face were better in Rowe scores (t=-4.072, P<0.05). In the reverse comparison of anchor insertion angle by postoperative Rowe scores, there was no statistically significant difference between the four corresponding anchor insertion angles at two-, three-, four- and five-o’clock positions respectively(t=0.312, 0.885, 0.775, 0.934 respectively, all P>0.05).

Conclusion

Suture anchor positioned on the glenoid face with reasonable insertion angle can achieve better short-term efficacy after arthroscopic Bankart repair, and the long-term efficacy needs to be further studied.

图2 术后肩关节CT平扫显示锚钉插入角度。在CT横断位图像上锚钉的中心线与肩胛盂关节面切线之间的夹角为锚钉插入角度
图3 术后肩关节CT平扫三维重建图。图A示3点、4点及5点钟面位置的锚钉全部落在肩胛盂边缘稍内侧的关节面上;图B示2~4点钟面位置的锚钉落在肩胛盂边缘,而5点钟位置的锚钉落在肩胛盂关节面上
表1 不同锚钉固定位置的术后评分比较(±s)
表2 不同Rowe评定分级的锚钉插入角度比较(±s)
[1]
Kim SH, Ha KI, Cho YB, et al. Arthroscopic anterior stabilization of the shoulder: two to six-year follow-up[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85(8): 1511-1518.
[2]
Koulalis D, Kendoff D, Citak M, et al. Freehand versus navigated glenoid anchor positioning in anterior labral repair[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19(9): 1554-1557.
[3]
Tong L, Yamamoto N, Shinagawa K, et al. Curved-guide system is useful in achieving optimized trajectory for the most inferior suture anchor during arthroscopic Bankart repair[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2019, 28(9): 1692-1698.
[4]
Yamamoto N, Muraki T, Sperling JW, et al. Does the "bumper" created during Bankart repair contribute to shoulder stability?[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(6): 828-834.
[5]
Sung HL, Kyeong HL, Jeong WK. Risk factors for recurrence of Anterior-Inferior instability of the shoulder after arthroscopic bankart repair in patients younger than 30 years[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(9): 2530-2536.
[6]
Park JY, Lee JH, Chung SW, et al. Does anchor placement on the glenoid affect functional outcome after arthroscopic bankart repair?[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(10): 2466-2471.
[7]
Park JY, Lee JH, Oh KS, et al. Does anchor insertion angle or placement of the suture anchor affect glenoid rim fracture occurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair?[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2020, 29(4): e124-e129.
[8]
Yoshida M, Goto H, Nozaki M, et al. Postoperative evaluation of drill holes for arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors by the use of computed tomography[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2015, 20(3): 481-487.
[9]
Lim TK, Koh KH, Lee SH, et al. Inferior anchor cortical perforation with arthroscopic bankart repair: a cadaveric study[J]. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29(1): 31-36.
[10]
Rowe CR, Patel D, Southmayd WW. The bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1978, 60(1): 1-16.
[11]
Ilahi OA, Al-Fahl T, Hasan B, et al. Glenoid suture anchor fixation strength: effect of insertion angle[J]. Arthroscopy, 2004, 20(6): 609-613.
[12]
Fehringer EV, Schmidt GR, Richard SB, et al. The anteroinferior labrum helps center the humeral head on the glenoid[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2003, 12(1): 53-58.
[13]
Jy K, Chung SW, Jy K. Morphological characteristics of the repaired labrum according to glenoid location and its clinical relevance after arthroscopic bankart repair: postoperative evaluation with computed tomography arthrography[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(6): 1304-1314.
[14]
Park JY, Lee SJ, Lhee SH, et al. Change in labrum height after arthroscopic Bankart repair: correlation with preoperative tissue quality and clinical outcome[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21(12): 1712-1720.
[15]
Carlo AA, Paladini P, Campi F, et al. Anterior glenoid rim fracture following use of resorbable devices for glenohumeral stabilization[J/OL]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2015, 3(6): 232596711558655. doi: 10.1177/2325967115586559.
[16]
Davidson PA, Tibone JE. Anterior-inferior (5 o’clock) portal for shoulder arthroscopy[J]. Arthroscopy, 1995, 11(5): 519-525.
[17]
Ekelund A. Cartilage injuries in the shoulder joint caused by migration of suture anchors or mini screw[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 1998, 7(5): 537-539.
[18]
Lehtinen JT, Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, et al. Variations in glenoid rim anatomy: implications regarding anchor insertion[J]. Arthroscopy, 2004, 20(2): 175-178.
[19]
Nakagawa S, Mae T, Yoneda K, et al. Influence of glenoid defect size and bone fragment size on the clinical outcome after arthroscopic bankart repair in male collision/contact athletes[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2017, 45(9): 1967-1974.
[20]
Hirose T, Nakagawa S, Iuchi R, et al. Progression of erosive changes of glenoid rim after arthroscopic bankart repair[J]. Arthroscopy, 2020, 36(1): 44-53.
[1] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[2] 谢佳乐, 李琦, 芦升升, 姜劲松. 内侧膝骨关节炎伴胫股关节冠状半脱位的手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 653-657.
[3] 郭艳波, 马亮, 李刚, 阎伟, 骆帝, 岳亮, 吴伟山. 全膝关节置换术后胫股关节脱位的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 658-671.
[4] 纪小孟, 刘璠, 唐晓波, 卞为伟, 董佩龙, 刘振鲁. 两种手术方式治疗肩袖撕裂合并粘连性肩关节囊炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 561-567.
[5] 许银峰, 盛璞义, 余世明, 张阳春. 偏心性髋臼旋转截骨术治疗发育性髋关节发育不良[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 568-574.
[6] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[7] 曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
[8] 冯亚飞, 唐诗添, 唐福宽, 周亮. 关节镜下mLSRS 技术及双排缝线桥技术治疗大型肩袖撕裂的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 295-301.
[9] 王友健, 陶然, 陆跃, 马洪冬. 退行性中、小型肩袖撕裂两种临床治疗效果对比[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 302-308.
[10] 王晓梅, 刘宇, 董金磊, 刘凡孝, 王成龙, 李连欣. 单一前方入路内固定对肱骨近端骨折合并肱骨头后脱位的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 319-325.
[11] 王利航, 孙官文, 包呼和, 倪熙宇, 张万印, 黄斐, 杨鹏波. 三种手术方式治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效的网状Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 332-343.
[12] 陈天鑫, 杨胜平, 朱瑜琪, 高云, 张帅. 多种手术方式治疗肩关节前向不稳定伴关节盂骨缺损的网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 344-352.
[13] 张琛朋, 王靖, 曾塬杰, 高鹏, 陈昕彤. 反式全肩关节置换术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 373-376.
[14] 陈利, 王锦海, 董浩男, 李利军. 锁骨钩钢板在肩锁关节脱位治疗中的不足及改良[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 377-381.
[15] 蒋永祥. 人工晶状体囊袋内脱位的手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 1-1.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?