切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 254 -258. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.02.023

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

个体化护理联合三黄膏治疗痛风性关节炎的效果
梁吒吒1,(), 陈怡1, 胡嘉媚1, 张小红1, 杨延丽1   
  1. 1. 528300 佛山,暨南大学附属顺德医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-25 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 梁吒吒

Clinical effects of individual nursing combined with Sanhuang plaster in treatment of gouty arthritis

Zhazha Liang1,(), Yi Chen1, Jiamei Hu1, Xiaohong Zhang1, Yanli Yang1   

  1. 1. The affiliated Shunde hospital of Jinan University, Foshan 528300, China
  • Received:2020-02-25 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhazha Liang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liang Zhazha, Email:
引用本文:

梁吒吒, 陈怡, 胡嘉媚, 张小红, 杨延丽. 个体化护理联合三黄膏治疗痛风性关节炎的效果[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 254-258.

Zhazha Liang, Yi Chen, Jiamei Hu, Xiaohong Zhang, Yanli Yang. Clinical effects of individual nursing combined with Sanhuang plaster in treatment of gouty arthritis[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 254-258.

目的

观察采用个体化护理联合三黄膏在治疗痛风性关节炎中的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2015年6月至2019年6月暨南大学附属顺德医院收治的痛风性关节炎患者共67人,个体化护理联合三黄膏者(n=18)为联合组;个体化护理而未使用三黄膏者(n=16)未个体组;常规护理并使用三黄膏者(n=20)为三黄组;常规护理未使用三黄膏者(n=13)为对照组。收集患者入院与出院时疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)、心理健康评分、疼痛缓解和住院时间、患者出院时满意度,出院后6个月内每月定期电话随访。计数资料采用卡方检验;计量资料正态分布且方差齐性者用单因素方差分析;计量资料不符合正态分布或方差不齐者采用秩和检验。

结果

4组患者的年龄、性别、入院时及出院时的VAS评分,入院时的心理评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),联合组和三黄组的疼痛缓解时间明显小于个体组和对照组(F=31.507,P<0.05),但三黄组住院时间更长。联合组和个体组出院时心理评分低于其他两组(F=4.817,P<0.05)。联合组和个体组的护理满意度明显高于其他两组(F=23.978,P<0.05)。出院后6个月内痛风性关节炎复发率:联合组16.7%(3/18),个体组18.8%(3/16),显著低于三黄组50%(10/10),对照组53.8%(7/13)(χ2=8.589,P<0.05),住院期间出现8例皮肤过敏,联合组1例,三黄组7例。

结论

个体化护理联合三黄膏治疗痛风性关节炎有一定临床效果,个体化护理是避免痛风关节炎复发的关键之一。

Objective

To explore the clinical effects of individualized nursing combined with Sanhuang plaster in the treatment of gouty arthritis.

Methods

Sixty-seven patients with gout arthritis who were admitted to the AffiliatedShundeHospitalof Jinan University from June 2015 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients used individualized nursing combined with Sanhuang plaster (n=18) were the combined group, the patients used individualized nursing without Sanhuang plaster (n=16) werethe individual group, the patients used routine nursing and Sanhuangplaster (n=20) were the Sanhuang group, and the patients used routine nursing only(n=13) werethe control group. The visual analogue scale (VAS score), psychological scoring, the pain relief time, hospital stay time, nursing satisfaction were collected and the monthly telephone follow-up records within six months after the discharge was applied. The enumeration data were tested by chi-square test. Single variance analysis was used for measurement data conforming to normal distribution and homogeneity of variance. Kruskal-Wallistest was used for those whose measurement data did not conform to the normal distribution or variance.

Results

There was no significant difference in age, gender, VAS score, or psychological scoring before admission among the four groups(P>0.05). The pain relief time of the combined group and Sanhuang group was significantly shorter than that of the individual group and the control group (F=31.507, P<0.05), but the hospitalization time of the Sanhuang group was longer. The psychological scoring before discharging of the combined group and the individual group were lower than that of the other two groups (F=4.817, P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the combined group and the individual group was significantly better than that of the other two groups (F=23.978, P<0.05). Within six months after discharge, the recurrence rate of gouty arthritis was 16.7% in the combined group, 18.8%in the individual group, significantly lower than 50% in the Sanhuang group, 53.8% in the control group(χ2=8.589, P<0.05). Eight cases of skin allergy occurred during hospitalization, one case in the combined group and seven in the Sanhuanggroup.

Conclusion

Individualized nursing combined with Sanhuang plaster has a positive role in the treatment of gouty arthritis, it is one of the keys to avoid the recurrence of gout arthritis.

表1 各组基本资料比较
图1 住院天数比较,4组间比较差异无统计学意义(F=2.241,P>0.05)
图2 疼痛缓解时间,4组间比较差异有统计学意义(F=31.507,P<0.01)。组间两两比较,联合组分别与个体组、对照组比较差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.01);三黄组分别与个体组、对照组比较差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.01)
图3 出院时SCL90(症状自评量表) 心理评分,4组间比较差异有统计学意义(F=4.817,P=0.004)。组间两两比较,联合组分别与三黄组、对照组比较差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.01);个体组分别与三黄组、对照组比较差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.01)
图4 6个月内复发率,4组间比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.589,P=0.035)。组间两两比较,联合组分别与三黄组、对照组比较差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.01);个体组分别与三黄组、对照组比较差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.01)
图5 护理满意度,4组间比较差异有统计学意义(F=23.978,P<0.01)。组间两两比较,联合组分别与三黄组、对照组比较差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.01);个体组分别与三黄组、对照组比较差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.01)
[1]
Wilson L, Saseen JJ. Gouty arthritis: a review of acute management and prevention[J]. Pharmacotherapy, 2016, 36(8): 906-922.
[2]
Charalambous A, Adamakidou T, Cloconi C, et al. The quality of oncology nursing care: a cross sectional survey in three countries in Europe[J]. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2017, 27: 45-52.
[3]
Hughes R. Overview and summary: patient-centered care: challenges and rewards[J]. Issues Nurs, 2011, 16 (2): 3-9.
[4]
Peláez-Ballestas I, Hernández Cuevas C, Burgos-Vargas R, et al.Diagnosis of chronic gout:evaluating the American college of rheumatology proposal,European league against rheumatism recommendations,and clinical judgment[J]. J Rheumatol, 2010, 37(8): 1743-1748.
[5]
Freyd M. The graphic rating scale[J]. J Educ Psychol, 1923, 14(2): 83-102.
[6]
Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures manual[M].3rdedn. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research, 1994
[7]
路杰,崔凌凌,李长贵.原发性痛风流行病学研究进展[J].中华内科杂志,2015,54(3): 244-247.
[8]
Fravel MA, Ernst ME, Clark EC.Goutandhyperuricemia.In:Dipiro JT,Talbert RL,Yee GC,et al. Pharmacotherapy:apathophysiologicapproach. 9th edition, NewYork: McGraw-HillEducation, 2014:1505-1524.
[9]
Khanna D, Fitzgerald JD, Khanna PP, et al. 2012, American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2012, 64(10): 1431-1446.
[10]
Laine L, Curtis SP, Cryer B, et al. Assessment of upper gastrointestinal safety of etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in the Multinational Etoricoxib and Diclofenac Arthritis Long-term (MEDAL) programme: a randomized comparison[J]. Lancet, 2007, 369(9560): 465-473.
[11]
周婕,马勤.三黄软膏外敷治疗急性痛风性关节炎疗效观察[J].新中医,2018,50(10): 104-106.
[12]
张凡,温肇霞,胡新林,等.痛风病人心理健康状况及影响因素分析[J].护理研究,2016,30(28): 3507-3510.
[13]
Kousoulou M, Suhonen R, Charalambous A. Associations of individualized nursing care and quality oncology nursing care in patients diagnosed with cancer[J]. Eur J OncolNurs,2019,41: 33-40.
[14]
Choi HK, Atkinson K, Karlson EW, et al. Alcohol intake and risk of incident gout in men: a prospective study[J]. Lancet, 2004, 363(9417): 1277-1281.
[15]
Choi HK, Atkinson K, Karlson EW, et al. Purine-rich foods, dairy and protein intake, and the risk of gout in men[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(11): 1093-1103.
[1] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[2] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[3] 樊绪国, 赵永刚, 杨砚伟. 腓骨在膝骨关节炎作用的研究观点[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 855-859.
[4] 贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[5] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[6] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[7] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[8] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[9] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[11] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[12] 王旭, 师绍敏, 毛燕, 季上, 刘亚玲. 肝酶代谢与骨关节炎相关性的研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 379-384.
[13] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[14] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[15] 许瑛杰, 朱佳, 康闽, 侯俊, 苏改秀, 李胜男, 张丹, 赖建铭. 风湿病合并消化道穿孔患儿的临床特点分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-654.
阅读次数
全文


摘要