切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华关节外科杂志(电子版)

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 249 -253. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.02.022

所属专题： 文献；

临床经验

自理理论在关节炎出院患者中的应用评价
肖艳红1, 徐巧巧1,†()   
  1. 1. 441021　襄阳，湖北文理学院附属医院，襄阳市中心医院东津院区静配中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-14 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 徐巧巧

Effects evaluation of theory of self-care in discharged elderly patients of knee osteoarthritis

Yanhong Xiao1, Qiaoqiao Xu1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Xiangyang Central Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441021, China
  • Received:2018-12-14 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Qiaoqiao Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Qiaoqiao, Emial:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

肖艳红, 徐巧巧. 自理理论在关节炎出院患者中的应用评价[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 249-253.

Yanhong Xiao, Qiaoqiao Xu. Effects evaluation of theory of self-care in discharged elderly patients of knee osteoarthritis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 249-253.

目的

探讨Orem自理理论在关节炎出院患者中的应用效果。

方法

选择2013年9月到2017年2月在襄阳市中心医院骨科行膝关节置换手术的老年膝骨关节炎出院患者72例为研究对象，其中骨科一病区的患者40例为观察组，骨科二病区的患者32例为对照组，排除智力障碍者。对照组给予常规出院护理，观察组给予Orem自理理论指导下的分级延伸护理，两组护理时间持续3个月，记录两组预后。采用t检验与χ2检验分析相关数据。

结果

观察组与对照组护理期间的功能锻炼依从性分别为100.0%和87.5%，观察组显著高于对照组(χ2＝5.294，P <0.05)；两组护理后美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分均显著高于护理前，护理后观察组的评分显著高于对照组(t＝7.444，P<0.05)。护理期间观察组的血栓栓塞、感染、尿潴留等并发症发生率为10.0%，对照组为40.6%，观察组显著低于对照组(χ2＝9.224，P<0.05)。观察组与对照组对护理服务满意度分别为97.5%和81.3%，观察组显著优于对照组(χ2＝5.349，P<0.05)。

结论

Orem自理理论指导下的分级延伸护理运用于老年膝骨关节炎出院患者，能提高患者功能锻炼的依从性、促进膝关节功能的改善，降低并发症发生率，提升患者满意度。

关键词: 骨关节炎, 膝, 自我护理, 模型, 护理学, 病人依从
Objective

To explore the effects of Orem theory of self-care in the discharged elderly patients of knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

From September 2013 to February 2017, 72 senile knee osteoarthritis patients in the department of orthopedics in Xiangyang Central Hospital who underwent hip replacement surgery were selected. Forty patients in the first orthopedics ward were the observation group, and 32 patients in the second orthopedics ward were the control group and were excluded people with intellectual disabilities. The control group were given routine discharge nursing, while the observation group were given graded extended care under the guidance of Orem theory of self-care. The nursing times in the two groups were lasted for three months, and the prognosis of two groups were recorded. The t test and chi-square test were used to analyze the relevant data.

Results

The compliance of the observation group and the control group were 100% and 87.5% respectively during the nursing period, and the observation group were significantly higher than the control group (χ2=5.294, P<0.05). The score of Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS) after nursing in the two groups were significantly higher than that before nursing, and the observation group after nursing weresignificantly higher than that of the control group(t=7.444, P<0.05). During the nursing period, the incidence of complications such as thromboembolism, infection and urinary retention was 10% in the observation group, while it was 40.6% in the control group. The observation group were significantly lower than the control group (χ2=9.224, P<0.05). The satisfaction of the observation group and the control group were 97.5% and 81.3% respectively, and the observation group was significantly higher than the control group (χ2=5.349, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The application of graded extended care under the guidance of Orem theory of self-care in the discharge patients of elderly knee osteoarthritis can improve the function of knee joint, improve the compliance of functional exercise, reduce the occurrence of complications, and improve patients' satisfaction with nursing work.

Key words: Osteoarthritis, knee, Self care, Models, nursing, Patient compliance
表1 两组患者一般资料对比
组别 例数 性别(男/女) 年龄[岁，(±s)] 手术患侧(左/右) 假体类型(生物型/水泥型) 住院时间[d，(±s)]
观察组 40 22/18 68±4 23/17 12/28 14±5
对照组 32 17/15 68±5 18/14 10/22 15±4
统计值   χ2＝0.025 t＝0.213 χ2＝0.011 χ2＝0.013 t＝0.533
P值   >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
表2 两组功能锻炼依从性对比
组别 例数 完全依从 部分依从 不依从 依从性(%)
观察组 40 36 4 0 100.0
对照组 32 22 6 4 87.5
χ2值   － － － 5.294
P值   － － － <0.05
表3 两组护理前后HSS评分对比[分，(±s)]
组别 例数(n) 护理前 护理后 t值 P值
观察组 40 50±9 91±5 33.195 <0.05
对照组 32 49±8 83±4 26.211 <0.05
t值   0.522 7.444    
P值   >0.05 <0.05    
表4 两组护理期间并发症情况对比
组别 例数 血栓栓塞 感染 尿潴留 合计
观察组 40 1 1 2 4(10.0%)
对照组 32 4 4 5 13(40.6%)
χ2值   － － － 9.244
P值   － － － <0.05
表5 两组护理服务满意度对比
组别 例数 非常满意 满意 不满意 满意度(%)
观察组 40 30 9 1 97.5
对照组 32 14 12 6 81.3
χ2值   － － － 5.349
P值   － － － <0.05
[1]
Gwam CU, Etcheson JI, George NE, et al. Presentation of knee osteoarthritis in the emergency department: a problem worth mentioning？[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2017, 31(22): 277-284.
[2]
卢雯，陈丽萍．高龄骨折患者出院后医院与社区护理有效衔接的效果评价[J]．中华护理杂志，2015，50(3): 280-283.
[3]
Stout AC, Barbe MF, Eaton CB, et al. Inflammation and glucose homeostasis are associated with specific structural features among adults without knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study from the osteoarthritis initiative[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2018, 19(1): 1-3.
[4]
Jackson H, Barnett LA, Jordan KP, et al. Patterns of routine primary care for osteoarthritis in the UK: a cross-sectional electronic health records study[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(12): 694-699.
[5]
Löwik CAM, Wagenaar FC, van der Weegen W, et al. LEAK study: design of a nationwide randomised controlled trial to find the best way to treat wound leakage after primary hip and knee arthroplasty[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(12): 673-677.
[6]
Robbins SR, Melo LRS, Urban H, et al. Stepped care approach for medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (STrEAMline): protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(12): 495-499.
[7]
Price PDB, Gissane C, Cleather DJ. Reliability and minimal detectable change values for predictions of knee forces during gait and stair ascent derived from the FreeBody musculoskeletal model of the lower limb[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2017, 5(5): 74-78.
[8]
纪莲莲，许艳．情志护理联合早期功能锻炼对老年全膝关节置换术后谵妄及关节功能恢复的影响[J]．国际护理学杂志，2016，35(11): 1521-1524.
[9]
Holden MA, Burke DL, Runhaar J, et al. Subgrouping and Targeted exercise programmes for knee and hip osteoarthritis (STEER OA): a systematic review update and individual participant data meta-analysis protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(12): e018971. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018971.
[10]
王玉萍，陶静，宋红艳，等．无痛化护理模式在人工膝关节置换术后病人中的应用[J]．全科护理，2015，8(28): 2797-2798.
[11]
Meehan JP, Monazzam S, Miles T, et al. Postoperative stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia is significantly reduced after simultaneous versus staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2017, 99(24): 2085-2093.
[12]
Finney A, Dziedzic KS, Lewis M, et al. Multisite peripheral joint pain: a cross-sectional study of prevalence and impact on general health, quality of Life, pain intensity and consultation behaviour[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2017, 18(1): 535-538.
[13]
李辉．Orem自护模式对全膝关节置换术后康复期患者自护能力和日常生活活动能力的影响[J]．中华现代护理杂志，2012，18(32): 3860-3863.
[14]
Xu J, Zhang J, Wang XQ, et al. Effect of joint mobilization techniques for primary total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J/OL]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(49): e8827.doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008827.
[15]
Mcqueen P, Gates L, Marshall M, et al. The effect of variation in interpretation of the La Trobe radiographic foot atlas on the prevalence of foot osteoarthritis in older women: the Chingford general population cohort[J]. J Foot Ankle Res, 2017, 10(10): 54-58.
[1] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[2] 曹雨欣, 毛卓君, 梁嘉赫, 伊江浦, 张泽凯, 马文帅, 陈云涛, 李晓倩, 张宇新, 曹铁生, 袁丽君. 3D打印心脏模型在模拟左心耳封堵术临床教学中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(06): 602-607.
[3] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[4] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[5] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[6] 熊鹰, 林敬莱, 白奇, 郭剑明, 王烁. 肾癌自动化病理诊断：AI离临床还有多远？[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 535-540.
[7] 屈勤芳, 束方莲. 盆腔器官脱垂患者盆底重建手术后压力性尿失禁发生的影响因素及列线图预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 606-612.
[8] 赵月, 田坤, 张宗明, 郭震天, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓. 降钙素原对老年急性重度胆囊炎发生的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 801-806.
[9] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[10] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[11] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[12] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[13] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
[14] 董晟, 郎胜坤, 葛新, 孙少君, 薛明宇. 反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分对老年严重创伤患者发生急性创伤性凝血功能障碍的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-547.
[15] 黄圣楷, 许斌, 苏健, 孙龙. 海南省2010~2020年乙型肝炎流行趋势的时间序列分析及预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 555-561.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号