切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 184 -188. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.02.010

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

后外侧注水通道在关节镜下踝关节融合术的应用
张成昌1, 段小军1, 林杨景1, 杨柳1,()   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,陆军军医大学第一附属医院(西南医院)关节外科中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-08 出版日期:2019-04-01
  • 通信作者: 杨柳
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市科委民生科技专项(cstc2016shmszx130069); 西南医院临床新技术计划项目(SWH2016BZGFGJJ-02)

Clinical study of posterolateral water inflow portal in arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis

Chengchang Zhang1, Xiaojun Duan1, Yangjing Lin1, Liu Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2018-10-08 Published:2019-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Liu Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Liu, Email:
引用本文:

张成昌, 段小军, 林杨景, 杨柳. 后外侧注水通道在关节镜下踝关节融合术的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 184-188.

Chengchang Zhang, Xiaojun Duan, Yangjing Lin, Liu Yang. Clinical study of posterolateral water inflow portal in arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(02): 184-188.

目的

研究后外侧注水通道在关节镜下踝关节融合术中应用的临床疗效,为技术推广提供参考。

方法

随访2005年7月至2017年7月在西南医院关节外科实施关节镜下踝关节融合术的患者。为提高关节镜器械的工作效率2014年3月起建立后外侧注水通道。将2005年7月至2014年3月的病例分为对照组,2014年3月至2017年7月的病例分为观察组,比较两组手术时间,两组手术前后的美国足踝外科学会踝-后足(AOFAS)评分,两组骨性融合时间。手术时间、骨性融合时间及AOFAS评分等计量资料采用t检验或非参数秩和检验进行统计学分析。

结果

所有患者获得随访,总共78例,其中观察组43例,对照组35例,随访时间(47±24)月(13~94月)。全部患者均在术后(15±3)周(11~20周)骨性融合,疼痛症状明显缓解,功能步态得到改善。早期对照组出现切口愈合不良1例,经换药后切口愈合良好。两组均未发现感染、深静脉血栓形成等并发症。在随访期间有5例患者踝关节融合术后出现距下关节炎。观察组手术时间(89±8)min与对照组(109±10)min比较,差异有统计学意义(t=9.290,P<0.01)。观察组术后1年AOFAS评分与术前相比差异有统计学意义(t=12.629,P<0.01),对照组术后1年AOFAS评分与术前相比差异有统计学意义(t=12.652,P<0.01),但是两组间对应时间点比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组的骨性融合时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

关节镜辅助下踝关节融合术中建立后外侧注水通道可以显著性缩短手术时间,提高手术效率,但是本技术存在学习曲线。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of posterolateral water inflow portal of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.

Methods

The patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital from July 2005 to July 2017 were followed up. The posterolateral water inflow portal was established from March 2014 to improve the efficiency of surgery. The patients from July 2005 to March 2014 were enrolled into the control groups and the patients from March 2014 to July 2017 were enrolled into the observation groups. The operation time, the AOFAS score and the bone fusion time were compared between the two groups by t test or rank sum test.

Results

Seventy-eight cases were followed up, including 43 cases in the observation group and 35 cases in the control group. The average follow-up time was (47±24) months. All the patients achieved bone fusion at (15±3) weeks after surgery, pain relief and gait improvement. One patient in the control group had surgical wound bad healing which was cured by change dressing. There was no joint infection, deep venous thrombosis in either groups. Five patients were found subtalar arthritis over all follow-up periods. The operative time of the observation group was (89±8) min, which was significantly less than (109±10) min of the control group (t=9.290, P<0.01). The AOFAS scores were significant improvement after surgery in observation groups (t=12.629, P<0.01) and in control groups (t=12.652, P<0.01), there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in bone fusion time between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The posterolateral water inflow portal can significantly shorten the operation time and improve the efficiency of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis, but there is a learning curve about this technique.

图1 踝关节镜后外侧注水通道穿刺点位置,画线示位于跟腱外缘与踝关节后缘之间的凹陷处
图2 建立后外侧注水通道步骤图。 图A为于穿刺位置行针头穿刺;图B 为文氏止血钳扩开关节囊;图C 为关节镜套筒沿止血钳方向插入关节囊;图D 为拔出针芯,连接注水通道及注水管
图3 关节镜下踝关节融合术中图像。图A 为镜下确认后外侧注水通道穿刺位置,示位置满意;图B 为关节软骨缺损明显;图C 为电动磨钻清除硬化骨;图D 为微骨折处理关节融合面
图4 关节镜监视下行克氏针定位,空心螺钉内固定流程。图A 为关节镜监视下钻入克氏针;图B 为从胫骨内外侧交叉行克氏针定位;图C 为术侧踝关节的术中X线透视,示克氏针穿过胫骨至距骨,确认位置满意;图D 为术侧踝关节的术中X线透视,示经皮交叉钻入2枚直径7.5 mm的空心螺钉,确认螺钉未进入距下关节
表1 两组患者治疗前后AOFAS踝-后足评分比较(±s)
[1]
Nihal A, Gellman RE, Embil JM, et al. Ankle arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2008, 14(1): 1-10.
[2]
Myerson MS, Quill G. Ankle arthrodesis. A comparison of an arthroscopic and an open method of treatment[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1991, (268): 84-95.
[3]
王玉光,陆芸.踝关节骨关节炎治疗方法的临床回顾[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2016,10(1):77-80.
[4]
Jones C, Ferkel R, Applegate G, et al. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a Long-Term follow-up study[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(6): e20.
[5]
Quayle J, Shafafy R, Khan MA, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2018, 24(2): 137-142.
[6]
Yasui Y, Vig KS, Murawski CD, et al. Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a comparison of subsequent procedures in a large database[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2016, 55(4): 777-781.
[7]
Saragas NP. Results of arthroscopic arthrodesis of the ankle[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2004, 10(3): 141-143.
[8]
Winson IG, Robinson DE, Allen PE. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2005, 87(3): 343-347.
[9]
Jones CR, Wong E, Applegate GR, et al. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a 2-15 year follow-up study[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(5): 1641-1649.
[10]
Glick JM, Morgan CD, Myerson MS, et al. Ankle arthrodesis using an arthroscopic method: Long-term follow-up of 34 cases[J]. Arthroscopy, 1996, 12(4): 428-434.
[11]
Duan X, Yang L, Yin L. Arthroscopic arthrodesis for ankle arthritis without bone graft[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016, 11(1): 154-162.
[12]
Lawton CD, Butler BA, Dekker IR, et al. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis-a comparison of outcomes over the last decade[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2017, 12(1): 76-86.
[13]
Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, et al. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(9): 1899-1905.
[14]
Kim HJ, Suh DH, Yang JH, et al. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis: a meta-analysis of comparative studies[J]. Int Orthop, 2017, 41(1): 101-109.
[15]
王旭,马昕,张超,等.踝关节置换术与踝关节融合术的临床应用趋势进展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2014,8(4):524-526.
[16]
Townshend D, Di Silvestro M, Krause F, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a multicenter comparative case series[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(2): 98-102.
[17]
Ferkel RD, Hewitt M. Long-term results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2005, 26(4): 275-280.
[18]
段小军,杨柳.踝关节重度骨关节炎行关节镜下踝关节融合术的临床研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2015,37(3):220-224.
[19]
Townshend D, Di Silvestro M, Krause F, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a multicenter comparative case series[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(2): 98-102.
[20]
Dent CM, Patil M, Fairclough JA. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1993, 75(5): 830-832.
[21]
Youichi, Yasui, Charles, et al. Ankle arthrodesis: a systematic approach and review of the literature[J]. World J Orthop, 2016, 7(11): 700-708.
[22]
Kolodziej L, Sadlik B, Sokolowski S, et al. Results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis with fixation using two parallel headless compression screws in a heterogenic group of patients[J]. Open Orthop J, 2017, 11(1): 37-44.
[23]
Park JH, Kim HJ, Suh DH, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(3): 988-997.
[1] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[2] 樊绪国, 赵永刚, 杨砚伟. 腓骨在膝骨关节炎作用的研究观点[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 855-859.
[3] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[4] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[5] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[6] 江泽莹, 王安婷, 王姣丽, 陈慈, 周秋玲, 黄燕娟, 周芳, 薛琰, 周剑烽, 谭文勇, 杜美芳. 多种植物油组分预防肿瘤放化疗相关毒性反应的效果分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 523-527.
[7] 朴广昊, 李屹洲, 刘瑞, 赵建民, 王凌峰. 皮肤撕脱伤撕脱皮瓣活力早期评估与修复的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 528-532.
[8] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[9] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[10] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[11] 邱朋, 邓正栋, 王剑明. 肝内胆管结石微创治疗策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 591-596.
[12] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[13] 陆志峰, 周佳佳, 梁舒. 虚拟现实技术在治疗弱视中的临床应用研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 891-895.
[14] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[15] 岳瑞雪, 孔令欣, 郝鑫, 杨进强, 韩猛, 崔国忠, 王建军, 张志生, 孔凡庭, 张维, 何文博, 李现桥, 周新平, 徐东宏, 胡崇珠. 乳腺癌HER2蛋白表达水平预测新辅助治疗疗效的真实世界研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 765-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要