切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 184 -188. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.02.010

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

后外侧注水通道在关节镜下踝关节融合术的应用
张成昌1, 段小军1, 林杨景1, 杨柳1,()   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,陆军军医大学第一附属医院(西南医院)关节外科中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-08 出版日期:2019-04-01
  • 通信作者: 杨柳
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市科委民生科技专项(cstc2016shmszx130069); 西南医院临床新技术计划项目(SWH2016BZGFGJJ-02)

Clinical study of posterolateral water inflow portal in arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis

Chengchang Zhang1, Xiaojun Duan1, Yangjing Lin1, Liu Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2018-10-08 Published:2019-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Liu Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Liu, Email:
引用本文:

张成昌, 段小军, 林杨景, 杨柳. 后外侧注水通道在关节镜下踝关节融合术的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 184-188.

Chengchang Zhang, Xiaojun Duan, Yangjing Lin, Liu Yang. Clinical study of posterolateral water inflow portal in arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(02): 184-188.

目的

研究后外侧注水通道在关节镜下踝关节融合术中应用的临床疗效,为技术推广提供参考。

方法

随访2005年7月至2017年7月在西南医院关节外科实施关节镜下踝关节融合术的患者。为提高关节镜器械的工作效率2014年3月起建立后外侧注水通道。将2005年7月至2014年3月的病例分为对照组,2014年3月至2017年7月的病例分为观察组,比较两组手术时间,两组手术前后的美国足踝外科学会踝-后足(AOFAS)评分,两组骨性融合时间。手术时间、骨性融合时间及AOFAS评分等计量资料采用t检验或非参数秩和检验进行统计学分析。

结果

所有患者获得随访,总共78例,其中观察组43例,对照组35例,随访时间(47±24)月(13~94月)。全部患者均在术后(15±3)周(11~20周)骨性融合,疼痛症状明显缓解,功能步态得到改善。早期对照组出现切口愈合不良1例,经换药后切口愈合良好。两组均未发现感染、深静脉血栓形成等并发症。在随访期间有5例患者踝关节融合术后出现距下关节炎。观察组手术时间(89±8)min与对照组(109±10)min比较,差异有统计学意义(t=9.290,P<0.01)。观察组术后1年AOFAS评分与术前相比差异有统计学意义(t=12.629,P<0.01),对照组术后1年AOFAS评分与术前相比差异有统计学意义(t=12.652,P<0.01),但是两组间对应时间点比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组的骨性融合时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

关节镜辅助下踝关节融合术中建立后外侧注水通道可以显著性缩短手术时间,提高手术效率,但是本技术存在学习曲线。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of posterolateral water inflow portal of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.

Methods

The patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital from July 2005 to July 2017 were followed up. The posterolateral water inflow portal was established from March 2014 to improve the efficiency of surgery. The patients from July 2005 to March 2014 were enrolled into the control groups and the patients from March 2014 to July 2017 were enrolled into the observation groups. The operation time, the AOFAS score and the bone fusion time were compared between the two groups by t test or rank sum test.

Results

Seventy-eight cases were followed up, including 43 cases in the observation group and 35 cases in the control group. The average follow-up time was (47±24) months. All the patients achieved bone fusion at (15±3) weeks after surgery, pain relief and gait improvement. One patient in the control group had surgical wound bad healing which was cured by change dressing. There was no joint infection, deep venous thrombosis in either groups. Five patients were found subtalar arthritis over all follow-up periods. The operative time of the observation group was (89±8) min, which was significantly less than (109±10) min of the control group (t=9.290, P<0.01). The AOFAS scores were significant improvement after surgery in observation groups (t=12.629, P<0.01) and in control groups (t=12.652, P<0.01), there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in bone fusion time between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The posterolateral water inflow portal can significantly shorten the operation time and improve the efficiency of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis, but there is a learning curve about this technique.

图1 踝关节镜后外侧注水通道穿刺点位置,画线示位于跟腱外缘与踝关节后缘之间的凹陷处
图2 建立后外侧注水通道步骤图。 图A为于穿刺位置行针头穿刺;图B 为文氏止血钳扩开关节囊;图C 为关节镜套筒沿止血钳方向插入关节囊;图D 为拔出针芯,连接注水通道及注水管
图3 关节镜下踝关节融合术中图像。图A 为镜下确认后外侧注水通道穿刺位置,示位置满意;图B 为关节软骨缺损明显;图C 为电动磨钻清除硬化骨;图D 为微骨折处理关节融合面
图4 关节镜监视下行克氏针定位,空心螺钉内固定流程。图A 为关节镜监视下钻入克氏针;图B 为从胫骨内外侧交叉行克氏针定位;图C 为术侧踝关节的术中X线透视,示克氏针穿过胫骨至距骨,确认位置满意;图D 为术侧踝关节的术中X线透视,示经皮交叉钻入2枚直径7.5 mm的空心螺钉,确认螺钉未进入距下关节
表1 两组患者治疗前后AOFAS踝-后足评分比较(±s)
[1]
Nihal A, Gellman RE, Embil JM, et al. Ankle arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2008, 14(1): 1-10.
[2]
Myerson MS, Quill G. Ankle arthrodesis. A comparison of an arthroscopic and an open method of treatment[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1991, (268): 84-95.
[3]
王玉光,陆芸.踝关节骨关节炎治疗方法的临床回顾[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2016,10(1):77-80.
[4]
Jones C, Ferkel R, Applegate G, et al. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a Long-Term follow-up study[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(6): e20.
[5]
Quayle J, Shafafy R, Khan MA, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2018, 24(2): 137-142.
[6]
Yasui Y, Vig KS, Murawski CD, et al. Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a comparison of subsequent procedures in a large database[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2016, 55(4): 777-781.
[7]
Saragas NP. Results of arthroscopic arthrodesis of the ankle[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2004, 10(3): 141-143.
[8]
Winson IG, Robinson DE, Allen PE. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2005, 87(3): 343-347.
[9]
Jones CR, Wong E, Applegate GR, et al. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a 2-15 year follow-up study[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(5): 1641-1649.
[10]
Glick JM, Morgan CD, Myerson MS, et al. Ankle arthrodesis using an arthroscopic method: Long-term follow-up of 34 cases[J]. Arthroscopy, 1996, 12(4): 428-434.
[11]
Duan X, Yang L, Yin L. Arthroscopic arthrodesis for ankle arthritis without bone graft[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016, 11(1): 154-162.
[12]
Lawton CD, Butler BA, Dekker IR, et al. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis-a comparison of outcomes over the last decade[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2017, 12(1): 76-86.
[13]
Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, et al. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(9): 1899-1905.
[14]
Kim HJ, Suh DH, Yang JH, et al. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis: a meta-analysis of comparative studies[J]. Int Orthop, 2017, 41(1): 101-109.
[15]
王旭,马昕,张超,等.踝关节置换术与踝关节融合术的临床应用趋势进展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2014,8(4):524-526.
[16]
Townshend D, Di Silvestro M, Krause F, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a multicenter comparative case series[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(2): 98-102.
[17]
Ferkel RD, Hewitt M. Long-term results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2005, 26(4): 275-280.
[18]
段小军,杨柳.踝关节重度骨关节炎行关节镜下踝关节融合术的临床研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2015,37(3):220-224.
[19]
Townshend D, Di Silvestro M, Krause F, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a multicenter comparative case series[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(2): 98-102.
[20]
Dent CM, Patil M, Fairclough JA. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1993, 75(5): 830-832.
[21]
Youichi, Yasui, Charles, et al. Ankle arthrodesis: a systematic approach and review of the literature[J]. World J Orthop, 2016, 7(11): 700-708.
[22]
Kolodziej L, Sadlik B, Sokolowski S, et al. Results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis with fixation using two parallel headless compression screws in a heterogenic group of patients[J]. Open Orthop J, 2017, 11(1): 37-44.
[23]
Park JH, Kim HJ, Suh DH, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(3): 988-997.
[1] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[2] 易柏成, 李旭光, 王容容, 王新璇. 数字化3D打印导板应用于上前牙钙化根管治疗2例[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 385-390.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[5] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[6] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[7] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[8] 陈伟杰, 何小东. 胆囊癌免疫靶向治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 763-768.
[9] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[10] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[11] 魏志鸿, 刘建勇, 吴小雅, 杨芳, 吕立志, 江艺, 蔡秋程. 肝移植术后急性移植物抗宿主病的诊治(附四例报告)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 846-851.
[12] 中国抗癌协会, 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会. 中国恶性肿瘤整合诊治指南-肛管癌(2024 版)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 441-449.
[13] 吴天宇, 刘子璇, 杨浦鑫, 贾思明, 丁凯, 程晓东, 李泳龙, 陈伟, 吕红芝, 张奇. 腰椎间盘突出症保守治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 379-384.
[14] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[15] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
阅读次数
全文


摘要