切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 411 -415. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.03.020

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的临床治疗分析
张应彬1, 郑鸣2, 李嘉易2, 黄玉麟1, 李登1, 蔡志清1, 苏保华1, 许杰1, 马若凡1,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院关节外科
    2. 510080 广州,中山大学中山医学院
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-24 出版日期:2018-06-01
  • 通信作者: 马若凡
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2013B051000024); 广东省科技项目(2014A020212060)

Clinical analysis of peri-prosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty

Yingbin Zhang1, Ming Zheng2, Jiayi Li2, Yulin Huang1, Deng Li1, Zhiqing Cai1, Baohua Su1, Jie Xu1, Ruofan Ma1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Joint Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
    2. Clinical Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2017-05-24 Published:2018-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Ruofan Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Ruofan, Email:
引用本文:

张应彬, 郑鸣, 李嘉易, 黄玉麟, 李登, 蔡志清, 苏保华, 许杰, 马若凡. 髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的临床治疗分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 411-415.

Yingbin Zhang, Ming Zheng, Jiayi Li, Yulin Huang, Deng Li, Zhiqing Cai, Baohua Su, Jie Xu, Ruofan Ma. Clinical analysis of peri-prosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 411-415.

目的

总结人工髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的病因及其治疗方法。

方法

回顾性分析自2011年1月至2017年1月于中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院治疗的并于术中、术后出现股骨假体周围骨折患者,排除初次手术前已经出现骨折的患者,共纳入男5例,女8例,平均年龄为(68±19)岁(34~93岁),初次置换病因:股骨颈骨折6例;股骨头缺血坏死5例,强直性脊柱炎1例,类风湿性关节炎1例。初次置换时股骨假体固定方式:骨水泥固定5例,其余8例病人为生物型假体。假体周围骨折病因包括7例有明确外伤史(不慎跌伤或车祸)、6例为翻修术中骨折。根据Vancouver分型,AG型3例,AL型1例,B2型4例,B3型3例,C型2例。翻修时骨折固定方式:5例采用大粗隆再结合装置加钢缆固定,7例使用钢板钢缆固定,1例病人使用异体皮质骨板加钢丝固定。在各类分型中,2例C型股骨假体周围骨折使用钢板钢缆固定骨折端,其余11例股骨假体均不稳定,仅1例使用骨水泥重新固定初次置换假体,余10例使用全涂层假体。通过Harris评分对患髋进行功能评价,X线或CT观察骨折愈合。采用Mann-Whitney检验对比术前、术后髋关节Harris评分、疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分。

结果

平均随访时间(29±19)月,平均骨折愈合时间为(4.5±1.1)月。Harris评分由术前13.0(4.0,25.0)提高至末次87.0(82.3,93.3)分,(Z =-4.34,P <0.05)。异体皮质骨板病例在末次随访时显示与宿主骨融合,所有病人末次随访均未见假体松动、脱位及感染。

结论

根据不同分型选择相应的骨折复位与固定方式,钢板钢缆组合有效提高了稳定性;对于骨量不足病人可以考虑使用异体皮质骨固定以增加患者骨量。

Objective

To study the etiology and treatment of peri-prosthetic femur fracture(PFF) after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

Retrospective analyze 13 peri-prosthetic femur fracture patients treated in Sun Yat-sen Memorrial hospital since Jan. 2011 to Jan. 2017. The mean age was (68±19) years. Five were males and eight were females. The reasons for primary THA were femoral neck fractures (n=6), avascular necrosis of femoral head(n=5), ankylosing spondylitis(n=1) and rheumatoid arthritis(n=1). Five cemented and eight cementless prostheses were used in primary THA. The causes of PFF were trauma (n=7) and intraoperative fractures (n=6). According to Vancouver classification, there was one case type AG, one case type AL, four cases type B2, three cases type B3 and two cases type C. Great trochanter reattachment was used to fix the fraction in 5, cable plate was applied in seven cases and allograft cortical bone plate was used in one case. Among them, two cases of type C PFF were conducted fracture fixation. The rest prostheses of 11 patients’ were all unstable, one used cement fixation and 10 used extensively porous-coated implants. The function of the hip was assessed through Harris score and the healing of fracture was evaluated by X-ray and CT. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare Harris scores and VAS scores before and after operation.

Results

All the implants were stable at the last visit, with an average follow-up time of (29±189) months (range, 9 to 73 months). The average healing time of fracture were (4.5±1.1) months. Harris score improved from 13.0(4.0, 25.0)to 87.0(82.3, 93.3)(Z=-4.34, P<0.05). No sign of implant loosening, dislocation, deep infection or other complications occurred during follow-up.

Conclusions

For peri-prosthetic femur fracture patients with unstable fracture or prosthetic loosening, surgical treatment could restore intrinsic hip stability, provide excellent pain relief and improve the walking capacity. According to different types of fraction, different kinds of fixation are chosen. Using cable plate could restore the stability effectively. For the patients with bone loss, allograft of cortical bone plate would be useful to increase bone volume.

图2 Vancouver B2型骨折患者左髋关节X线正位片。图A 术前左髋正位片,示假体周围骨折;图B 术后左髋正位片,示使用钢板钢缆固定骨折端
图4 Vancouver C型骨折患者左髋关节术前(4A)和术后(4B)X线,复位骨折端后钢板钢缆固定
图5 图A,B 男,75岁,髋关节置换术后10年假体松动,伴严重骨质缺损,可见股骨干骨折,考虑B3型骨折;图C  采用同种异体皮质骨+线缆固定;图D  术后半年异体皮质骨板可见部分桥接,假体稳定
[1]
Streit MR, Merle C, Clarius M, et al. Late peri-prosthetic femoral fracture as a major mode of failure in uncemented primary hip replacement[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, 93(2):178-183.
[2]
Sheth NP, Brown NM, Moric M, et al. Operative treatment of early Peri-Prosthetic femur fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(2):286-291.
[3]
Rupprecht M, Sellenschloh K, Grossterlinden L, et al. Biomechanical evaluation for mechanisms of periprosthetic femoral fractures[J]. J Trauma, 2011, 70(4):E62-E66.
[4]
Young SW, Walker CG, Pitto RP. Functional outcome of femoral peri prosthetic fracture and revision hip arthroplasty-a matched-pair study from the New Zealand Registry[J]. Acta Orthop, 2008, 79(4):483-488.
[5]
Berry, Daniel J. Epidemiology: Hip and Knee[J]. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1999, 30(2):183-190.
[6]
Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape HC. Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(Suppl 2):S66-S70.
[7]
刘燚,严建军,崔胜宇,等.Synthes线缆系统置入内固定治疗全髋关节置换后股骨假体周围骨折[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,18(13):1988-1993.
[8]
Briant-Evans TW, Veeramootoo D, Tsiridis E, et al. Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases[J]. Acta Orthop, 2009, 80(5):548-552.
[9]
Tsiridis E, Narvani AA, Haddad ES, et al. Impaction femoral allografting and cemented revision for periprosthetic femoral fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2004, 86B(8):1124-1132.
[10]
Corten K, Macdonald SJ, Mccalden RW, et al. Results of cemented femoral revisions for periprosthetic femoral fractures in the elderly[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(2):220-225.
[11]
Tower SS, Beals RK. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement: the Oregon experience[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 1999, 30(2):235-247.
[12]
Springer BD, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85-A(11):2156-2162.
[13]
Emerson RJ. Basic science of onlay allografts: a review[J]. Instr Course Lect, 2000, 49:97-102.
[14]
Tsiridis E, Spence G, Gamie Z, et al.Grafting for periprosthetic femoral fractures: strut, impaction or femoral replacement[J]. Injury, 2007, 38(6):688-697.
[15]
许福生,刘方刚,祁伟.髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的诊疗进展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2015,09(4):536-540.
[1] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[2] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[3] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[4] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[5] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[6] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[7] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[10] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[11] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[12] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[13] 王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.
[14] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[15] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
阅读次数
全文


摘要