切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 309 -314. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.03.008

临床论著

Pilon骨折术后发生手术部位感染的危险因素分析
毛文文1, 陈昊2, 李立3, 朱友森3, 张敏3, 陈刚3,()   
  1. 1. 225100 扬州大学医学院;225200 扬州市江都人民医院
    2. 225100 扬州大学医学院
    3. 225200 扬州市江都人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-05 出版日期:2022-06-01
  • 通信作者: 陈刚
  • 基金资助:
    扬州市科技局重点项目(SSF2021000051)

Risk factors of surgical site infection following surgical treatment of Pilon fractures

Wenwen Mao1, Hao Chen2, Li Li3, Yousen Zhu3, Min Zhang3, Gang Chen3,()   

  1. 1. Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225100, China; Department of orthopedics, Yangzhou Jiangdu people's Hospital, Yangzhou 225200, China
    2. Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225100, China
    3. Department of orthopedics, Yangzhou Jiangdu people's Hospital, Yangzhou 225200, China
  • Received:2021-04-05 Published:2022-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Gang Chen
引用本文:

毛文文, 陈昊, 李立, 朱友森, 张敏, 陈刚. Pilon骨折术后发生手术部位感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 309-314.

Wenwen Mao, Hao Chen, Li Li, Yousen Zhu, Min Zhang, Gang Chen. Risk factors of surgical site infection following surgical treatment of Pilon fractures[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 309-314.

目的

探讨Pilon骨折术后发生手术部位感染的相关危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2020年6月行因Pilon骨折在扬州市江都人民医院行手术治疗的309例患者的临床资料,排除入院前有感染病史的患者,根据术后是否发生手术部位感染分为两组。比较两组患者之间性别、年龄、身体质量指数(BMI)、吸烟史、高血压、糖尿病病史、骨折类型、有无张力性水泡、是否合并关节脱位、骨折分型、受伤至手术时间、术后引流量、手术时间、手术入路、美国麻醉医师协会麻醉分级(ASA)、内固定钢板数量、是否临时使用外固定支架等相关因素对手术部位可能发生感染的影响。统计学分析包括独立样本t检验、卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,将有统计学意义的单因素为自变量行多因素logistic回归分析。

结果

本研究共纳入研究对象309例,其中术后发生手术部位感染25例,感染发生率为8.1%(25/309),22例患者切口分泌物培养阳性结果,阳性率为88%,最常见病原体是金黄色葡萄球菌(7/22, 31.8%),大肠埃希菌(6/22, 27.3%)和表皮葡萄球菌(4/22, 18.2%)。单因素分析显示两组患者手术时间、高血压、国际内固定学会骨折分类系统(AO)分型、开放性骨折、吸烟史的差异有统计学意义(t=2.629,χ2=7.646、12.184、6.438、14.268,均为P<0.05)。而多因素logistic回归分析显示开放性骨折、吸烟为Pilon骨折术后感染的独立危险因素[比值比(OR)=3.770、11.129,均为P<0.05]。

结论

开放性骨折、吸烟是Pilon骨折切开复位内固定术后手术部位感染的独立危险因素。

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of surgical site infection after Pilon fracture surgery.

Methods

The clinical data of 309 patients who underwent surgical treatment for Pilon fracture in Yangzhou Jiangdu People′s Hospital from January 2015 to June 2020 were analyzed retrospectively, excluding patients with a history of infection before admission. They were divided into two groups according to whether postoperative surgical site infection occurred. The gender, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, hypertension, diabetes history, fracture type, tension blister, joint dislocation, fracture classification, injury to operation time, postoperative drainage, operative time, surgical approach, anesthesiologist's anesthesia level (ASA), number of internal fixation plates, and whether used external fixing bracket temporarily in the two groups were compared. Statistical analysis included independent sample t test, chi square test or Fisher exact test. The statistically significant single factors were taken as independent variable for logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 309 patients were included in this retrospective study, including 25 cases of postoperative infection at the surgical site, with an infection rate of 8.1% (25/309). Twenty-two patients had positive results of incision secretion culture, with a positive rate of 88%. The most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (7/22, 31.8%), Escherichia coli (6/22, 27.3%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (4/22, 18.2%). Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in operation time, hypertension, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification, open fracture and smoking history between the two groups (t=2.629, χ2=7.646, 12.184, 6.438, 14.268, all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that open fracture and smoking were independent risk factors for postoperative infection of Pilon fracture [odds ratio (OR)=3.770, 11.129, both P <0.05].

Conclusion

Open fracture and smoking are independent risk factors of surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of Pilon fracture.

表1 两组计量资料的比较(±s )
表2 两组计数资料的比较(例)
表3 Pilon骨折术后感染多因素分析结果
[1]
Liu J, Smith CD, White E, et al. A systematic review of the role of surgical approaches on the outcomes of the tibia Pilon fracture[J]. Foot Ankle Spec, 2016, 9(2): 163-168.
[2]
Boris AZ, Khang HD, Samuel SO. High-energy tibial pilon fractures: an instructional review[J]. Int Orthop, 2019, 43(8): 1939-1950.
[3]
张琰冰.踝关节骨折切开复位内固定术后踝关节镜手术的临床结果[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)201913(3):309-312.
[4]
Rogers, Selwyn O. Surgical perspective:centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection 2017[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2017, 18(4): 383-384.
[5]
Metsemakers WJ, Kortram K, Morgenstern M, et al. Definition of infection after fracture fixation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to evaluate current practice[J]. Injury, 2018, 49(3): 497-504.
[6]
Meng J, Sun T, Zhang F, et al. Deep surgical site infection after ankle fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation in adults: a retrospective case-control study[J]. Int Wound J, 2018, 15(6): 971-977.
[7]
Ren T, Ding L, Xue F, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection of pilon fractures[J]. Clinics, 2015, 70(6): 419-422.
[8]
Spitler CA, Hulick RM, Weldy J, et al. What are the risk factors for deep infection in OTA/AO 43C Pilon fractures?[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2020, 34(6): e189-e194.
[9]
Carbonell-Escobar R, Rubio-Suarez JC, Ibarzabal-Gil A, et al. Analysis of the variables affecting outcome in fractures of the tibial pilon treated by open reduction and internal fixation[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2017, 8(4): 332-338.
[10]
Wei SJ, Han F, Lan SH, et al. Surgical treatment of Pilon fracture based on ankle position at the time of injury/initial direction of fracture displacement: a prospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2014, 12(5): 418-425.
[11]
Ren D, Wang T, Liu Y, et al. Treatment of the tibial pilon fractures using the antero-medial fibula approach: ten case series[J/OL]. Medicine, 2020, 99(28): e20576.DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020576.
[12]
Wang Z, Qu W, Liu T, et al. A two-stage protocol with vacuum sealing drainage for the treatment of type C Pilon fractures[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2016, 55(5): 1117-1120.
[13]
张宪高,张一,王志强.胫骨远端pilon骨折手术入路研究进展[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志202114(4):303-309.
[14]
莫征然,周干溪,王井旺,等.微创锁定加压钢板术治疗胫腓骨远端骨折[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)202014(3):334-338.
[15]
Chan DS, Balthrop PM, White B, et al. Does a staged posterior approach have a negative effect on OTA 43C fracture outcomes?[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2017, 31(2): 90-94.
[16]
Assal M, Ray A, Stern R. Strategies for surgical approaches in open reduction internal fixation of Pilon fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015, 29(2): 69-79.
[17]
Spitler CA, Hulick RM, Weldy J, et al. What are the risk factors for deep infection in OTA/AO 43C Pilon fractures?[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2020, 34(6):e189-e194.
[18]
Shao J, Chang HR, Zhu YB, et al. Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2017, 41(4): 176-182.
[19]
Srensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery: the pathophysiological impact of smoking, smoking cessation, and nicotine replacement therapy: a systematic review[J]. Annals of Surgery, 2012, 255(12):748-755
[20]
Abdelgaid SM, Moursy AF, Elgebaly E, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of ankle fractures in patients at high risk of soft tissue wound healing complications[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2018, 57(3): 557-571.
[21]
Mills E, Eyawo O, Lockhart I, et al. Smoking cessation reduces postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Med, 2011, 124(2): 144-154.e8.
[22]
White TO, Guy P, Cooke CJ, et al. The results of early primary open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of OTA 43.C-type tibial Pilon fractures: a cohort study[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010, 24(12): 757-763.
[23]
Duckworth AD, Jefferies JG, Clement ND, et al. Type C tibial Pilon fractures:short-and long-term outcome following operative intervention[J]. Bone Joint J, 2016, 98-B(8): 1106-1111.
[24]
Molina CS, Stinner DJ, Fras AR, et al. Risk factors of deep infection in operatively treated Pilon fractures (AO/OTA: 43)[J]. J Orthop, 2015, 12(Suppl 1):S7-S13.
[25]
Papasoulis E, Zalavras CG, Patzakis MJ. Prevention of infection in open fractures[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2016, 31(2): 339-352.
[26]
Yuwen P, Chen W, Lv H, et al. Albumin and surgical site infection risk in orthopaedics: a meta-analysis[J/OL]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 7.DOI: 10.1186/s12893-016-0186-6.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[4] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[5] 李国煜, 丛赟, 祖丽胡马尔·麦麦提艾力, 何铁英. 急性胰腺炎并发门静脉系统血栓形成的危险因素及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 266-270.
[6] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[7] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[8] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[9] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[10] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[11] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要