切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 492 -495. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.04.015

临床经验

肩胛上神经松解对关节镜修补巨大肩袖撕裂的早期影响
王文1, 王敏1,(), 梁绍华1, 秦胜男1, 陈亮1, 梁伟国1   
  1. 1. 510220 广州,暨南大学附属广州红十字会医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-03 出版日期:2021-09-29
  • 通信作者: 王敏

Early effect of arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repair with suprascapular nerve release

Wen Wang1, Min Wang1,(), Shaohua Liang1, Shengnan Qin1, Liang Chen1, Weiguo Liang1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510220, China
  • Received:2021-03-03 Published:2021-09-29
  • Corresponding author: Min Wang
引用本文:

王文, 王敏, 梁绍华, 秦胜男, 陈亮, 梁伟国. 肩胛上神经松解对关节镜修补巨大肩袖撕裂的早期影响[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 492-495.

Wen Wang, Min Wang, Shaohua Liang, Shengnan Qin, Liang Chen, Weiguo Liang. Early effect of arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repair with suprascapular nerve release[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(04): 492-495.

目的

比较巨大肩袖撕裂患者关节镜下修补伴或不伴肩胛上神经松解对早期功能康复的影响。

方法

回顾性分析暨南大学附属广州红十字会医院骨科巨大肩袖撕裂行关节镜下双排锚钉修补术治疗的46例患者。其中23例行了肩胛上神经松解,23例没有行肩胛上神经松解。术后对两组患者的临床早期疗效进行对比分析,包括视觉模拟评分(VAS),美国加州大学洛杉矶分校评分(UCLA)、Constant-Murley评分、肩关节活动范围。采用重复测量方差分析对治疗结果进行统计学分析。

结果

两组患者在年龄、撕裂的大小、随访时间等方面无明显差别。两组患者术后2个月的平均VAS评分,UCLA评分、Constant-Murley评分,肩关节活动范围较术前均有明显改善(t=-3.30、12.20、14.31、61.55、61.55,均为P<0.01),松解组较非松解组有明显改善(t=-2.27、8.28、20.76、62.20,均为P<0.05);术后6个月及12月随访两组患者VAS评分,UCLA评分、Constant-Murley评分,肩关节活动范围,松解组和非松解组均较2个月随访改善,但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);12个月后随访复查MRI肩袖修补愈合率相仿,随访未出现医源性神经损伤、锚钉脱出、关节腔感染等并发症。

结论

肩胛上神经松解能促进巨大肩袖撕裂修复患者的早期功能恢复,但肩胛上神经的松解对巨大肩袖撕裂修补患者的远期治疗无明显效果。

Objective

To compare the effects of early functional recovery after arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repair with or without suprascapular nerve release.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 46 patients treated with arthroscopic double-row repair for massive rotator cuff tear in Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University. Among them, 23 cases underwent suprascapular nerve release, while the others did not. A comparative analysis of the early functional recovery of two groups was carried out: including visual analogue scale (VAS) score, University of California at Los Angeles(UCLA) score, Constant-Murley score, shoulder range of motion(ROM). The results were statistically analyzed using repeated measure analysis of variance.

Results

There was no significant difference between two groups in gender, age, size of tear, and follow-up period. The average VAS score, UCLA score, Constant-Murley score, and range of motion of shoulder joint of the two groups at two months after the surgery were significantly improved compared with the preoperative data(t=-3.30, 12.20, 14.31, 61.55, 61.55, all P<0.01), the release group were significantly better than the non-release group (t=-2.27, 8.28, 20.76, 62.20, all P <0.05). After six and 12 months of follow-up, the VAS score, UCLA score, Constant-Murley score, shoulder ROM were all improved compared with that of two month follow-up, but the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). At 12 months of follow-up, MRI shown similar healing rate of the rotator cuff between groups. There was no complication such as iatrogenic nerve injury or infection.

Conclusions

Concomitant suprascapular nerve release could play a positive role in early functional recovery in patients with massive rotator cuff repair. However, the release of suprascapular nerve has no significant effect on the long-term treatment of patients with giant rotator cuff tear.

图1 镜下肩胛上切迹的肩胛上横韧带A的暴露
图2 镜下咬切肩胛上横韧带
图3 镜下松解完的肩胛上神经C
表1 两组患者基本信息(±s)
表2 两组患者关节镜手术前后功能评分(±s)
[1]
蔡万松,陆志剀.80例肩袖损伤患者行肩关节镜肩袖修复术治疗的临床疗效探讨研究[J].浙江创伤外科201722(4):761-763.
[2]
徐达传,温广明,黄美贤.肩袖的解剖学特点[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)20104(1):100-104.
[3]
陈雨舟,陈疾忤,陈世益.肩袖修补术后再撕裂的相关研究进展[J/CD].中华骨科杂志201737(3):173-182.
[4]
刘玉雷,闫辉,肖健,等.关节镜下缝合桥双排固定技术治疗肩袖全层撕裂的初步疗效[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)20115(6):710-714.
[5]
kedros JG, Henrie TR.Latissimus Dorsi Tendon Transfer with graft jacket augmentation to increase tendon lenhtor an ireparable rotator cuff tear[J].Case Rep 0rthop201717:808-812.
[6]
Gilot GJ, Alvarez-Pinzon AM, Barcksdale L, et al. Outcome of large to massive rotator cuff tears repaired with and without extracellular matrix augmentation: a prospective comparative study[J]. Arthroscopy, 2015, 31(8): 1459-1465.
[7]
Heuberer PR, Koelblinger R, Buchleitner SA, et al. Arthroscopic management of massive rotator cuff tears: an evaluation of debridement, complete, and partial repair with and without force couple restoration[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(12): 3828-3837.
[8]
王健全.肩关节疾病诊断和治疗的新进展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)20126(1):1-4.
[9]
Hee YG, Cho NS, Yoo JH. Clinical outcome and repair integrity after rotator cuff repair in patients older than 70 years versus patients younger than 70 years[J]. Arthroscopy, 2014, 30(5): 546-554.
[10]
Corpus KT, Taylor SA, O′brien SJ, et al. All-arthroscopic modified rotator interval slide for massive anterosuperior cuff tears using the subdeltoid space: surgical technique and early results[J]. HSS J, 2016, 12(3): 200-208.
[11]
Ranade AV, Rai R, Rai AR, et al. Variants of latissimus dorsi with a perspective on tendon transfer surgery: an anatomic study[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(1): 167-171.
[12]
孙亚英,陈疾忤,尚西亮,等.关节镜辅助下背阔肌腱转位联合肩袖修补治疗肩袖后上方不可修复的巨大撕裂[J].中华骨科杂志201737(21):1326-1332.
[13]
Denard PJ, Brady PC, Adams CR, et al. Preliminary results of arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction with dermal allograft[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(1): 93-99.
[14]
Petrillo S, Longo UG, Papalia R, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review[J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2017, 101(2): 105-112.
[15]
Senekovic V, Poberaj B, Kovacic L, et al. The biodegradable spacer as a novel treatment modality for massive rotator cuff tears: a prospective study with 5-year follow-up[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2017, 137(1): 95-103.
[1] 纪小孟, 刘璠, 唐晓波, 卞为伟, 董佩龙, 刘振鲁. 两种手术方式治疗肩袖撕裂合并粘连性肩关节囊炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 561-567.
[2] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[3] 杨占宇, 黄艳华, 马小迪, 冯安莹, 王旼娴, 龙青燕. 本体感觉训练对踝关节周围骨折患者步行能力的改善[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 477-483.
[4] 杨滢甄, 黄子荣, 梁家敏, 黄晓芳, 胡艳, 朱伟民. 膝关节前交叉韧带重建术前康复治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 538-544.
[5] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[6] 孙俊锋, 涂家金, 付丹, 蒋满香, 刘金晶, 崔乃硕. 手部烧伤瘢痕挛缩畸形整形术后综合康复联合点阵二氧化碳激光治疗的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 411-415.
[7] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[8] 李月平, 李科, 乔禹铭, 钟美浓. 前列腺热蒸汽消融术医护康一体化快速康复模式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 464-472.
[9] 曹健, 冯高华, 周卫军, 陈诚, 沈王丰, 吴英姿. 补脾益肺膏联合肺康复训练治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 781-784.
[10] 杨轲, 丁增巴姆, 马静, 李盼盼, 陈婷. 全程无缝隙肺康复训练在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 801-804.
[11] 任甜甜, 张玉慧, 祁玲霞, 朱梅冬, 胡佳. 多学科疼痛管理对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后胸痛及应激反应的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 630-633.
[12] 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 上肢外骨骼机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 312-317.
[13] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[14] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[15] 刘芳明, 石秀秀, 唐冲, 张克石, 徐影, 王桂杉, 关振鹏, 李晓. 骨科康复患者对数字疗法应用的知晓度和需求度:一项基于928 份问卷调查结果分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 654-661.
阅读次数
全文


摘要