切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华关节外科杂志(电子版)

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 243 -247. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.02.018

所属专题： 文献；

临床经验

国产股骨柄假体在前路髋关节置换中的应用
迟方舟1, 张涛1, 符诗坚1, 曹博然1, 王浩君1, 王继隆1, 王文波1,†(), 王玉鹏2   
  1. 1. 150001　哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院骨三科
    2. 150081　哈尔滨医科大学统计学教研室
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-26 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王文波

Application of domestic femoral stem prosthesis in direct anterior arthroplasty

Fangzhou Chi1, Tao Zhang1, Shijian Fu1, Boran Cao1, Haojun Wang1, Jilong Wang1, Wenbo Wang1,†(), Yupeng Wang2   

  1. 1. Orthopaedics Department, the 1st affiliated hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
    2. Department of statistics, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
  • Received:2020-02-26 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Wenbo Wang
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

迟方舟, 张涛, 符诗坚, 曹博然, 王浩君, 王继隆, 王文波, 王玉鹏. 国产股骨柄假体在前路髋关节置换中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 243-247.

Fangzhou Chi, Tao Zhang, Shijian Fu, Boran Cao, Haojun Wang, Jilong Wang, Wenbo Wang, Yupeng Wang. Application of domestic femoral stem prosthesis in direct anterior arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 243-247.

目的

评价BE2柄在植入后早期的稳定性(下沉、偏移)、并发症及功能评分的结果，以及初步评价BE2股骨柄假体植入后早期的临床效果。

方法

收集2018年9月至2019年12月于哈医大一院骨科采用BE2股骨柄假体进行初次髋关节置换术的病例资料，全部病例均为微创前路关节置换(DAMIS)。本组包括89例(110髋)，男50例(65髋)，女39例(45髋)其中股骨头坏死62例(74髋)，股骨颈骨折8例，髋关节骨关节炎6例(8髋)，DDH6例(9髋)，强直髋7例(11髋)。随访内容包括术中阔筋膜张肌肌肉损伤量，术前术后标准骨盆正位片、髋关节功能评分(Harris评分)、牛津髋关节评分(OHS)及髋关节伤残及骨关节炎-身体机能(HOOS-PS)评分、健康调查简表(SF-36量表)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)，并采用重复测量方差分析评分数据。

结果

术中测量损伤的阔筋膜张肌肌肉的质量(0.51±0.31)g。Harris评分(F＝687.77, P<0.001)，OHS评分(F＝215.98, P<0.001)，HOOS-PS评分(F＝499.48, P<0.001)，VAS评分(F＝1066.53, P<0.001)，以及SF-36量表中心理健康评分(PCS评分)(F＝551.61, P<0.001)，身体健康评分(MCS评分)(F＝207.55, P<0.001)，术后末次随访较术前比较差异均具有统计学意义。影像学测量显示，2名患者术后3个月可见股骨柄下沉超过3 mm、2名患者术后6个月可见股骨柄轴向偏移超过3°。双侧置换者术后双侧偏心距差别均小于4 mm，术后3个月时影像学上可见假体表面骨长上迹象。

结论

国产BE2型股骨柄假体应用在不同骨质量的髋关节置换中，能获得早期的干骺端骨结合和可靠的假体早期稳定性，可以良好地重建股骨近端偏心距，有效地改善髋关节活动功能。术后早期并发症发生率低。尤其适合于应用于DAMIS中。

关键词: 关节成形术, 置换, 髋, 外科手术, 微创性, 假体和植入物
Objective

To evaluate the stability (subsidence, deviation), complications and functional scores of the BE2 femoral stem prosthesis, and to evaluate the early clinical effect of BE2 femoral stem prosthesis.

Methods

The clinical data with the use of BE2 femoral stem in the orthopaedics department of the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from Sept 2018 to Dec 2019. There were 89 cases (110 hips), including 50 males (65 hips) and 39 females (45 hips). The main pathology for surgery included osteonecrosis of the femoral head (62 cases, 74 hips), femoral neck fracture(eight cases), hip osteoarthritis(six cases, eight hips), DDH(developmental dysplasia of the hip) (six cases, nine hips) and ankylosis (seven cases, 11 hips) . The contents of follow-up included intraoperative measurement of muscle injury of tensor fascia lata, preoperative and postoperative standard pelvic radiograph, Harris score, Oxford hip score(OHS), hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score-performance status(HOOS-PS), short form 36-item (SF- 36)scale, and visual analogue scale(VAS) score. Repeated measurement of variarance wasapplied for data analysis.

Results

The average amount of debried tensor fascia lata muscle was(0.51±0.31)g. There were significant differences between postoperative and the last preoperative follow-up, including Harris score (F=687.77, P<0.001), OHS score(F=215.98, P<0.001), HOOS-PS(F=499.48, P<0.001), VAS score(F=1066.53, P<0.001), and physical component summary (PCS)score of SF-36 scale(F=551.61, P<0.001) mental component summary(MCS) score of SF-36 scale(F=207.55, P<0.001). The results of radiographic measurement showed that two patients had stem subsidence three months, two patients had axial stem deviation six months. In the patients with bilateral replacement, the difference of bilateral offset distance was less than 4 mm, and signs of bone ingrowth began to appear on the surface of prosthesis in three months after operation.

Conclusions

The early outcomes of the BE2 stem applied consecutively in the patient with different bone stock are promising. Solid stability can be obtained within three months by metaphysical bone integration, leading to fast restoration of the hip function. Furthermore, BE2 is more suitable in DAMIS.

Key words: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Minimally Invasive Surgery, Prostheses and implants
图2 随访病例各疾病数量
表1 BE2型股骨柄假体手术前后临床评分比较分析(分，n＝89)
时间 Harris OHS HOOS-PS SF-36 VAS
PCS MCS
术前 40.6±18.9 38.7±8.9 67.4±13.7 29.0±9.7 50.9±9.6 6.6±1.2
术后3个月 84.0±3.9 29.7±2.8 44.0±5.5 48.6±6.9 66.6±6.9 2.1±0.8
术后6个月 96.2±3.7 22.4±2.9 28.2±5.3 65.0±6.3 72.1±6.4 0.6±0.2
F值a 443.2 80.0 205.7 238.1 156.9 1 476.5
F值b 687.8 216.0 499.45 551.6 207.6 1 066.5
F值c 485.0 186.9 233.0 171.8 18.2 119.7
P值 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
图3 BE2型股骨柄假体手术前后临床评分变化趋势。图A为Harris髋关节评分，示上升趋势；图B为HOOS(髋关节伤残及骨关节炎评分)评分，示下降趋势；图C为OHS(牛津髋关节评分)评分，示下降趋势；图D为MSC(心理健康)评分，示上升趋势；图E为PCS(身体健康)评分，示上升趋势；图F为VAS(视觉模拟评分)评分，示下降趋势
图5 髋关节置换手术前后偏心距重建情况影像。图A全髋关节置换术前骨盆正位片，示右髋关节骨关节炎；图B全髋关节置换术后随访骨盆正位片，示髋关节偏心距重建情况良好
图6 髋关节置换术后骨界面愈合情况影像。图A全髋关节置换术后即时骨盆正位片，示假体位置良好；图B全髋关节置换术后3个月骨盆正位片，示BE2柄与骨界面愈合良好
[1]
Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Mallory TH, et al. Survivorship of 2000 tapered Titanium porous plasma-sprayed femoral components[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(1): 146-154.
[2]
Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, et al. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011, 93(5): 500-509.
[3]
Van OJ, Molleman J, Klaver M, et al. Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies[J]. Acta Orthop, 2014, 85(3): 250-258.
[4]
Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, et al. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur[J]. Bone, 1993, 14(3): 231-242.
[5]
Laucis NC, Hays RD, Bhattacharyya T. Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics: a brief guide[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2015, 97(19): 1628-1634.
[6]
Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89(8): 1010-1014.
[7]
Yilmaz O, Gul ED, Bodur H. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score-physical function short-form (HOOS-PS)[J]. Rheumatol Int, 2014, 34(1): 43-49.
[8]
Cinotti G, Sessa P, Ripani FR, et al. Correlation between posterior offset of femoral condyles and sagittal slope of the tibial plateau[J]. J Anat, 2012, 221(5): 452-458.
[9]
Albers A, Aoude AA, Zukor DJ, et al. Favorable results of a short, tapered, highly porous, proximally coated cementless femoral stem at a minimum 4-year follow-up[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(4): 824-829.
[10]
Drosos GI, Touzopoulos P. Short stems in total hip replacement: evidence on primary stability according to the stem type[J]. Hip Int, 2019, 29(2): 118-127.
[11]
Loppini M, Grappiolo G. Uncemented short stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: the state of the art[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2018, 3(5): 149-159.
[12]
Kim YH, Kim JS, Joo JH, et al. A prospective short-term outcome study of a short metaphyseal fitting total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(1): 88-94.
[13]
Floerkemeier T, Tscheuschner N, Calliess T, et al. Cementless short stem hip arthroplasty METHA® as an encouraging option in adults with osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2012, 132(8): 1125-1131.
[14]
Morales DJ, Gordo C, Canosa AJ. Short femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty: stable fixation and low complication rates in elderly patients[J]. Hip Int, 2017, 27(4): 311-316.
[15]
Malhotra R, Kumar V. Mid-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty using a short stem[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2016, 24(3): 323-327.
[1] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[2] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[3] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[4] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[5] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[6] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[7] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[8] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[9] 陈山林, 魏绮珮, 刘畅. 腕关节假体：路在何方？[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 469-475.
[10] 刘林峰, 王增涛, 王云鹏, 钟硕, 郝丽文, 仇申强, 陈超. 足底内侧皮瓣联合甲骨皮瓣在手指V度缺损再造中的临床应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 480-484.
[11] 吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[12] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[13] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
[14] 付庆鹏, 邓晓强, 高伟, 姜福民, 范永峰, 吴海贺, 齐岩松, 包呼日查, 徐永胜. 新型股骨测量定位器在全膝关节置换术中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 980-987.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号