切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 461 -468. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.04.012

所属专题: 文献

荟萃研究

单半径和多半径后稳定型膝关节假体疗效的Meta分析
彭正午1, 王波1, 黄添隆1, 毛新展1, 李辉1,()   
  1. 1. 410011 长沙,中南大学湘雅二医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-05 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 李辉

Meta-analysis on outcome of single- versus multi-radius posterior stabilized prostheses in total knee arthroplasty

Zhengwu Peng1, Bo Wang1, Tianlong Huang1, Xinzhan Mao1, Hui Li1,()   

  1. 1. The second Xiangya hospital, Changsha 410011, China
  • Received:2020-01-05 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Hui Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Hui, Email:
引用本文:

彭正午, 王波, 黄添隆, 毛新展, 李辉. 单半径和多半径后稳定型膝关节假体疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 461-468.

Zhengwu Peng, Bo Wang, Tianlong Huang, Xinzhan Mao, Hui Li. Meta-analysis on outcome of single- versus multi-radius posterior stabilized prostheses in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 461-468.

目的

比较单半径(SR)和多半径(MR)后稳定型假体在全膝关节置换(TKA)术后的临床疗效。

方法

对荷兰医学文摘(Embase),Web of Science和Cochrane临床对照试验中心注册库4个数据库进行检索,选择使用单半径(SR)和多半径(MR)后稳定型假体作为初次膝关节置换的随机对照研究提取相关资料。采用RevMan 5.3软件对纳入数据进行异质性检验和Meta分析。

结果

最终纳入7篇随机对照试验文献(RCTs),共667位患者、667例膝关节置换。结果显示:SR与MR假体术后随访的膝关节评分系统的功能评分、膝关节牛津评分、活动度、屈曲度、站立位最小屈曲度、并发症等结果的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。而SR全膝关节置换术术后膝关节评分系统的膝关节评分和站立位最大屈曲度优于MR假体,差异具有统计学意义(I2=1%,Z=2.03,P < 0.05)。

结论

SR和MR后稳定型假体在膝关节置换中的术后临床效果无明显差异,但SR假体的术后膝关节评分系统的膝关节评分和站立位最大屈曲度要优于MR。

Objective

To compare single radius(SR) and multi radius(MR) femoral posterior stabilized prostheses in total knee arthroplasty(TKA).

Methods

The articles about TKA treated by SR and MR were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (the Cochrane Central Register) and Excerpta Medica Database (Embase). The databases from a randomized controlled trials using SR and MR femoral posterior stabilized prostheses in firstly TKA were selected. The meta-analysis and heterogeneity test were performed with RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting 667 patients underwent total knee replacements were included in current study. The outcomes of this meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant statistical difference in Knee Society scores of functions, the range of motion, the flexion, the min flexion in stance phase and the complications between SR and MR TKA(P>0.05). The Knee Society scores of knee and max flexion in stance phase of SR were better than MR(I2=1%, Z=2.03, P<0.05).

Conclusion

No significant clinical difference is found between SR and MR posterior stabilized prostheses in TKA, but the Knee Society scores of knee and the max flexion in stance phase of SR are better than MR.

图1 文献筛选流程图
图2 随机对照试验的偏倚风险图
表1 Meta分析中所包含文献的基本资料
图3 SR(单半径)和MR(多半径)假体TKA(全膝关节置换)术后评分的森林图。图A为SR和MR假体TKA术后KSS(膝关节协会评分)比较的森林图;图B为SR和MR假体TKA术后KSS比较的森林图(敏感性分析后);图C为SR和MR假体TKA术后OKS(牛津膝关节评分)比较的森林图;SD(标准差);IV(逆方差);CI(置信区间);df(自由度)
图4 SR(单半径)和MR(多半径)假体TKA(全膝关节置换)术后KSSF(膝关节功能评分)比较的森林图。SD(标准差);IV(逆方差);CI(置信区间);df(自由度)
图5 SR(单半径)和MR(多半径)假体TKA(全膝关节置换)术后活动度、站立位最大屈曲度和摆动位最大屈曲度比较森林图;SD(标准差);IV(逆方差);CI(置信区间);df(自由度)
图6 SR(单半径)和MR(多半径)假体TKA(全膝关节置换)术后屈曲度及站立位最小屈曲度比较的森林图;SD(标准差);IV(逆方差);CI(置信区间);df(自由度)
图7 单半径和多半径假体TKA术后并发症比较的森林图;RR(风险率);IV(逆方差);CI(置信区间);df(自由度)
图8 SR和MR组术后KSFS比较漏斗图。KSFS(膝关节评分系统的膝关节评分)
[1]
Graves SE, Davidson D, Ingerson L, et al.The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry[J]. Med J Aust,2004,180(S5): S31-S34.
[2]
Lamb SE, Frost H.Recovery of mobility after knee arthroplasty: expected rates and influencing factors[J]. J Arthroplasty,2003,18(5): 575-582.
[3]
Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, et al. The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Clin Orthop Relat Res,2006,452(452): 35-43.
[4]
Jo AR, Song EK, Lee KB, et al.A comparison of stability and clinical outcomes in single-radius versus multi-radius femoral design for total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty,2014,29(12): 2402-2406.
[5]
Liu SL, Long H, Zhang YL, et al.Meta-analysis of outcomes of a single-radius versus multi-radius femoral design in total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty,2016,31(3): 646-654.
[6]
Li MY, Deng ZT, Jiang H, et al.Single radius versus multiple radius femoral prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med,2019,12(8): 9508-9521.
[7]
Hall J, Copp S, Adelson W, et al. Extensor mechanism function in single-radius vs multi-radius femoral components for total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty,2008,23(2): 216-219.
[8]
Jenny JY, Rolf M, Dominique S et al. Single-radius, multidirectional total knee replacement[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res,2013,21(12): 2764-2769.
[9]
Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Stevens JE, et al.Early quadriceps strength loss after total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg,2005,87(5): 1047-1053.
[10]
Jiang C, Liu ZL, Wang Y, et al.Posterior cruciate ligament retention versus posterior stabilization for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis[J/OL]. Plos One, 2016, 11(1): e0147865. doi:org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147865.
[11]
Migliorini F, Eschweiler J, Tingart M, et al. Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retained implants for total knee arthroplasty: ameta-analysis of clinical trials[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2019, 29(4): 937-946.
[12]
Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al.Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [J/OL]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2019,10:Ed000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
[13]
Hamilton DF, Simpson AHRW, Burnett R, et al.Lengthening the moment arm of the patella confers enhanced extensor mechanism power following total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Orthop Res, 2013, 31(8): 1201-1207.
[14]
Tamaki M, Tomita T, Yamazaki T, et al. Factors in high-flex posterior stabilized fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty affecting in vivo kinematics and anterior tibial post impingement during gait[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(10): 1722-1727.
[15]
Kim DH, Kim DK, Lee SH, et al.Is Single-radius design better for quadriceps recovery in total knee arthroplasty?[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2015, 27(4): 240-246.
[16]
Larsen B, Jacofsky MC, Jacofsky DJ.Quantitative, comparative assessment of gait between single-radius and multi-radius total knee arthroplasty designs[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(6): 1062-1067.
[17]
Menciere ML, Epinette J-A, Gabrion A, et al. Does high flexion after total knee replacement really improve our patients' quality of life at a short-term follow-up?[J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(10): 2079-2086.
[18]
Mushtaq N, Liddle AD, Isaac D, et al. Patient-reported outcomes following single- and multiple-radius total knee replacement: a randomized, controlled trial[J]. J Knee Surg,2018,31(1): 87-91.
[19]
Schmitt J, Hauk C, Kienapfel H, et al. Navigation of total knee arthroplasty: rotation of components and clinical results in a prospectively randomized study[J/OL]. Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders,2011,12:16.doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-16.
[20]
Hitzl W, Heisinger S, Hobusch GM, et al.Projected numbers of primary total knee replacement in Austria from 2015-2075[J]. Orthopade, 2019, 48(2): 144-149.
[21]
D′Lima DD, Poole C, Chadha H, et al.Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2001,392:213-220.
[22]
Frankel VH, Burstein AH, Brooks DB. Biomechanics of internal derangement of the knee. Pathomechanics as determined by analysis of the instant centers of motion[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1971,53(5): 945-962.
[23]
Ostermeier S, Stukenborg C. Quadriceps force after TKA with femoral single radius[J]. Acta Orthop, 2011, 82(3): 339-343.
[24]
Stoddard JE, David DJ, Bull AM, et al. The kinematics and stability of single-radius versus multi-radius femoral components related to mid-range instability after TKA[J]. J Orthop Res, 2012, 31(1): 53-58.
[25]
Collados-Maestre I, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gonzalez-Navarro B, et al. Better functional outcome after single-radius TKA compared with multi-radius TKA[J]. Knee Surg Sport Tra,2017,25(11): 3508-3514.
[26]
Hinarejos P, Puig-Verdie L, Leal J, et al.No differences in functional results and quality of life after single-radius or multiradius TKA[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res,2016,24(8): 2634-2640.
[27]
Mugnai R, Digennaro V, Ensini A, et al.Can TKA design affect the clinical outcome? Comparison between two guided-motion systems[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2014,22(3): 581-589.
[28]
Mahoney OM, Mcclung CD, Dela Rosa MA, et al.The effect of total knee arthroplasty design on extensor mechanism function[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2002,17(4): 416-421.
[29]
Yercan HS, Selmi TAS, Sugun TS, et al.Tibiofemoral instability in primary total knee replacement: a review, Part 1: basic principles and classification[J]. Knee, 2005,12(4): 257-266.
[30]
Mcclelland JA, Webster KE, Feller JA. Gait analysis of patients following total knee replacement: a systematic review[J]. Knee,2007,14(4): 253-263.
[1] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[2] 唐玮, 何融泉, 黄素宁. 深度学习在乳腺癌影像诊疗和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 323-328.
[3] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[4] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[5] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[6] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[7] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[8] 陈山林, 魏绮珮, 刘畅. 腕关节假体:路在何方?[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 469-475.
[9] 吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[10] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[11] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[12] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[13] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[14] 付庆鹏, 邓晓强, 高伟, 姜福民, 范永峰, 吴海贺, 齐岩松, 包呼日查, 徐永胜. 新型股骨测量定位器在全膝关节置换术中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 980-987.
[15] 张曦才, 曹先德, 高建萍, 沈大庆, 曹现祥, 郭诗杰, 李凤岳, 肖琳. 免人工肾积水在超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 798-803.
阅读次数
全文


摘要