切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 391 -396. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.04.001

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

肩关节镜下单排缝合技术治疗肩袖撕裂
何河北1, 潘乘龙1,(), 李宝龙1, 宋斌2, Stephen Snyder3, 王涛1, 胡勇1, 朱惠峰1, 陈玉书4   
  1. 1. 510900 广州,南方医科大学第五附属医院关节外科
    2. 510000 广州,中山大学附属第二医院
    3. 91405 洛杉矶,美国南加州骨科研究中心
    4. 510120 广州医科大学附属第一医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-31 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 潘乘龙
  • 基金资助:
    广东省教育厅特色创新项目(2017KTSCX154)

Efficacy of rotator cuff repair by single row suture under shoulder arthroscope

Hebei He1, Chenglong Pan1,(), Baolong Li1, Bin Song2, Stephen Snyder3, Tao Wang1, Yong Hu1, Huifeng Zhu1, YuShu Chen4   

  1. 1. Department of joint surgery of the fifth affiliated hospital of southern medical university, Guangzhou 510900, China
    2. Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou 510000, China
    3. Southern California Orthopedic Institute, Los Angeles 91405, USA
    4. The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical Universitym, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2020-05-31 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Chenglong Pan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Pan Chenglong, Email:
引用本文:

何河北, 潘乘龙, 李宝龙, 宋斌, Stephen Snyder, 王涛, 胡勇, 朱惠峰, 陈玉书. 肩关节镜下单排缝合技术治疗肩袖撕裂[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 391-396.

Hebei He, Chenglong Pan, Baolong Li, Bin Song, Stephen Snyder, Tao Wang, Yong Hu, Huifeng Zhu, YuShu Chen. Efficacy of rotator cuff repair by single row suture under shoulder arthroscope[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 391-396.

目的

探讨肩关节下南加州骨科研究所单排缝合技术(SCOI row)治疗大中型肩袖撕裂的疗效。

方法

对2018年6月至2018年8月南方医科大学第五附属医院关节外科使用SCOI row技术缝合治疗的大中型肩袖撕裂患者进行回顾性研究。纳入中型或者大型肩袖撕裂,排除依从性较差合并其他损伤的患者,共纳入26例患者,男10例,女16例;平均年龄(64±5)岁。SCOI row技术即采用单排3线锚钉固定结合足印区周围扩多个骨髓孔技术。术前关节镜下测量肩袖撕裂范围为2~4 cm,其中冈上肌撕裂9例(34.6%),冈上肌、肩胛下肌撕裂11例(42.4%),冈上肌、冈下肌、肩胛下肌撕裂3例(11.5%),冈上肌、冈下肌撕裂3例(11.5%)。术后6个月通过MRI评判肩袖是否愈合,测量足印区新组织厚度,比较术前与术后6个月疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及肩关节功能评分(UCLA)及肩关节主、被动活动度。术前与术后6个月的数据比较采用配对t检验。

结果

所有患者术后获(7.9±1.6)个月随访。术前、术后6个月VAS评分分别为(6.5±1.7)、(2.1±0.8)分,差异有统计学意义(t =10.225,P<0.05)。UCLA评分术前为(12.7±3.8)、术后6个月(31.1±1.6)分,差异有统计学意义(t =-3.066, P<0.05)。术后6个月足印区新组织厚度平均为(7.08±0.28)mm。术后6个月患者被动前屈、主动前屈、被动外展、主动外展、中立位被动外旋、中立位主动外旋活动度分别为(162.1±10.5)°、(155.3±38.5)°、(138.2±29.3)°、(130.4±22.4)°、(26.2±8.2)°、(15.3±7.3)°,均较术前明显提高(t =-7.913、-11.263、-8.286、-7.285、-11.734、-4.891,均为P <0.05)。术后6个月MRI显示肩袖撕裂足印区完全愈合为24例,再次撕裂2例,愈合率92.3%。

结论

SCOI row技术缝合肩袖撕裂通过MRI评判愈合较高,肩关节功能恢复较好,疼痛缓解,是一种治疗肩袖撕裂的有效方法。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of Southern California Orthopedic Institute single row suturing technique(SCOI Row) in the treatment of medium and large rotator cuff tears.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in the patients with large and medium-sized rotator cuff tears treated with SCOI Row suture in the joint surgery department of the fifth affiliated hospital of Southern Medical University from June 2018 to August 2018. Medium or large rotator cuff tears were included, and the patients with poor compliance and other injuries were excluded. A total of 26 patients were enrolled, including 10 males and 16 females. The average age was (64±5) years. SCOI ROW technology adopts single row three-line anchor fixation combined with multiple bone marrow pore enlargement around the footprint area. The range of rotator cuff tear measured under preoperative arthroscopy was from two to four centimeters, including supraspinatus tear in nine cases (34.6%), supraspinatus and subscapularis muscle tear in 11 cases (42.4%), supraspinatus, subspascularis muscle tear in three cases (11.5%), supraspinatus and subscapularis muscle tear in three cases (11.5%), supraspinatus and subscapularis muscle tear in three cases (11.5%). Six months after the operation, the rotator cuff healing was evaluated by MRI, the new tissue thickness in the foot print area was measured, and the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), shoulder joint function score (UCLA), and shoulder joint active and passive activity were statistically compared before and six months after the operation. Paired t-test was used to compare data before and six months after surgery.

Results

All the patients were followed up for six to 10 months (7.9±1.6). Before and six months after the surgery, VAS scores were (6.5±1.7) and (2.1±0.8), UCLA scores were (12.7±3.8) and (31.1±1.6). The differences were statistically significant (VAS t=10.225, UCLA t=-3.066, both P <0.05). The average new tissue thickness in the foot print area six months after the operation was (7.08±0.28) mm. At six months after the operation, the activity levels of passive pronation, active pronation, passive abduction, active abduction, passive pronation in the neutral position and active pronation in the neutral position were(162.1±10.5)°, (155.3±38.5)°, (138.2±29.3)°, (130.4±22.4)°, (26.2±8.2)°, (15.3±7.3)°, respectively, which were significantly higher than those before the operation, and the differences were statistically significant (t =-7.913, - 11.263, -8.286, -7.285, -11.734, -4.891, all P <0.05). Six months after the operation, MRI showed that the rotator cuff tear completely healed in 24 cases, and tore again in two cases, with a healing rate of 92.3%.

Conclusion

The rotator cuff tear with SCOI row technique is an effective treatment option with good healing rate, pain relief and it is beneficial for the shoulder function.

图2 SCOI row(南加州骨科研究所单排缝合技术)缝线缝合示意图
表1 术前和术后6个月大中型肩袖撕裂患者疼痛及功能比较[n=26,(±s)]
图3 典型病例术前及术中术后情况。图A为术前右肩关节MRI,可见冈上肌明显撕裂;图B为术前右肩关节前斜冠状位MRI,可见肩袖撕裂;图C为关节镜下使用SCOI row方法修复肩袖,见肩袖撕裂;图D为关节镜下置入金属锚钉,同时给与微骨折孔;图D、E为关节镜下使用SCOI row方法修复肩袖后,箭头示3线锚钉缝合肩袖术后,图F为关节镜下用SCOI row法手术情况,箭头示微骨折孔释放鲜红色血液;图G、H为术后6个月复查右肩MRI,可见肩关节足印区至大结节处有新的组织长出
[1]
Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, et al. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal?[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005, 87(6): 1229-1240.
[2]
Lambers Heerspink FO, van Raay JJ, Koorevaar RC, et al. Comparing surgical repair with conservative treatment for degenerative rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(8): 1274-1281.
[3]
Chakravarty K, Webley M. Shoulder joint movement and its relationship to disability in the elderly[J].J Rheumatol, 1993, 20(8): 1359-1361.
[4]
Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010, 19(1): 116-120.
[5]
Akplnar S, Uysal M, Pourbagher MA, et al. Prospective evaluation of the functional and anatomical results of arthroscopic repair in small and medium-sized full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon[J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2011, 45(4): 248-253.
[6]
Ryösä A, Laimi K, Äärimaa V, et al. Surgery or conservative treatment for rotator cuff tear: a meta-analysis[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2017, 39(14):1357-1363.
[7]
Baums MH, Buchhorn GH, Spahn G, et al. Biomechanical characteristics of single-row repair in comparison to double-row repair with consideration of the suture configuration and suture material[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2008, 16(11): 1052-1060.
[8]
Nelson CO, Sileo MJ, Grossman MG, et al.Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison[J]. Arthroscopy, 2008, 24(8): 941-948.
[9]
Ozbaydar M, Elhassan B, Esenyel C, et al. A comparison of single-versus double-row suture anchor techniques in a simulated repair of the rotator cuff: an experimental study in rabbits[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2008, 90(10): 1386-1391.
[10]
Park JY, Lhee SH, Choi JH, et al. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single-and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2008, 36(7): 1310-1316.
[11]
Park MC, ElAttrache NS, Ahmad CS, et al. Transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique[J]. Arthroscopy, 2006, 22(12): 1360-1365.
[12]
Killian ML, Cavinatto L, Shah SA, et al.The effects of chronic unloading and gap formation on tendon-to-bone healing in a rat model of massive rotator cuff tears[J]. J Orthop Res, 2014, 32(3): 439-447.
[13]
Kim KC, Shin HD, Cha SM, et al.Comparison of repair integrity and functional outcomes for 3 arthroscopic suture bridge rotator cuff repair techniques[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2013, 41(2): 271-277.
[14]
Choi CH, Kim SK, Cho MR, et al. Functional outcomes and structural integrity after double-pulley suture bridge rotator cuff repair using serial ultrasonographic examination[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21(12): 1753-1763.
[15]
Koh KH, Kang KC, Lim TK, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of single-versus double-row suture anchor repair in 2-to 4-cm rotator cuff tears: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results[J]. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(4): 453-462.
[16]
Taniguchi N, Suenaga N, Oizumi N, et al. Bone marrow stimulation at the footprint of arthroscopic surface-holding repair advances cuff repair integrity[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(6): 860-866.
[17]
Uhthoff HK, Sano H, Trudel G, et al. Early reactions after reimplantation of the tendon of supraspinatus into bone. A study in rabbits[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2000, 82(7): 1072-1076.
[18]
Uhthoff HK, Sarkar K. Surgical repair of rotator cuff ruptures. The importance of the subacromial bursa[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1991, 73(3): 399-401.
[19]
Dierckman BD, Ni JJ, Karzel RP, et al. Excellent healing rates and patient satisfaction after arthroscopic repair of medium to large rotator cuff tears with a single-row technique augmented with bone marrow vents[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(1): 136-145.
[20]
Bilsel K, Yildiz F, Kapicioglu M, et al. Efficacy of bone marrow-stimulating technique in rotator cuff repair[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2017, 26(8): 1360-1366.
[21]
Coons DA, Barber FA, Herbert MA. Triple-loaded single-anchor stitch configurations: an analysis of cyclically loaded suture-tendon interface security[J]. Arthroscopy, 2006, 22(11): 1154-1158.
[22]
Dierckman BD, Wang DW, Bahk MS, et al. In vivo measurement of rotator cuff tear tension: medial versus lateral footprint position[J]. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2016, 45(3): 83-90.
[23]
Castagna A, Garofalo R, Conti M, et al. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a triple-loaded suture anchor and a modified Mason-Allen technique (Alex stitch)[J]. Arthroscopy, 2007,23(4): 440-444.
[1] 陈慧, 姚静, 张宁, 刘磊, 马秀玲, 王小贤, 方爱娟, 管静静. 超声心动图在多发性骨髓瘤心脏淀粉样变中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 943-949.
[2] 曹雯佳, 刘学兵, 罗安果, 钟释敏, 邓岚, 王玉琳, 李赵欢. 超声矢量血流成像对2型糖尿病患者颈动脉壁剪切应力的研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 709-717.
[3] 徐志刚, 曹涛, 何亭, 李博奥, 魏婧韬, 张栋梁, 官浩, 杨薛康. 采用抗生素骨水泥治疗糖尿病患者心脏术后胸骨骨髓炎的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 498-502.
[4] 郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.
[5] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[6] 黄韬, 杨晓华, 薛天森, 肖睿. 改良“蛋壳”技术治疗老年OVCF及对脊柱矢状面平衡参数、预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 340-348.
[7] 谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[8] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[9] 张峻, 赵建民, 姚晓克, 吉浩宇, 越瑞祥. 增加CT对桡骨远端骨折分型的可靠性及可重复性评价[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 264-272.
[10] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[11] 张于, 程亮亮, 王峰, 赵德伟. 2枚与3枚空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-286.
[12] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[13] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[14] 周锐, 罗飞. 骨质疏松椎体骨折的分型进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-320.
[15] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要