切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 154 -158. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.02.005

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

经皮螺钉内固定微创手术在踝关节骨折的短期疗效
王华国1,(), 邹仲兵1, 林伟鹏1, 黄永锋1, 欧荣通1, 陈桂全1, 叶劲1   
  1. 1. 527300 云浮市人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-10 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王华国

Short-term effects of minimally invasive surgery with percutaneous screw fixation on ankle fractures

Huaguo Wang1,(), Zhongbing Zou1, Weipeng Lin1, Yongfeng Huang1, Rongtong Ou1, Guiquan Chen1, Jin Ye1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Yunfu People's Hospital, Yunfu 527300, China
  • Received:2020-01-10 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Huaguo Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Huaguo, Email:
引用本文:

王华国, 邹仲兵, 林伟鹏, 黄永锋, 欧荣通, 陈桂全, 叶劲. 经皮螺钉内固定微创手术在踝关节骨折的短期疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 154-158.

Huaguo Wang, Zhongbing Zou, Weipeng Lin, Yongfeng Huang, Rongtong Ou, Guiquan Chen, Jin Ye. Short-term effects of minimally invasive surgery with percutaneous screw fixation on ankle fractures[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 154-158.

目的

探讨经皮螺钉内固定微创手术治疗踝关节骨折的效果及其对患者生活质量评分(QOL)的影响。

方法

根据纳入排除标准,选取120例2015年1月至2019年10月在云浮市人民医院治疗踝关节骨折的患者。纳入标准:确诊为新鲜闭合性踝关节骨折;临床资料完整;非Pilon或粉碎性骨折。排除标准:对本研究所涉术式存在禁忌证;下胫腓关节分离;压缩性、粉碎性骨折;心脑血管病变者,重要器官功能异常及恶性肿瘤;精神功能障碍。应用信封法分组为对照组(60例)和研究组(60例)两组,两组患者均实施手术治疗,对照组使用传统切开复位内固定术治疗,研究组使用经皮螺钉内固定微创手术进行治疗。对比两组患者生活质量(QOL)评分、两组临床指标状况、两组患者预后状况以及对比两组患者踝关节功能恢复状况。计量资料采用t检验,计数资料使用卡方检验。

结果

研究组患者在社会功能(t=16.332)、心理功能(t=15.663)、情感智能(t=17.452)、认知功能(t=17.998)、躯体功能(t=18.552)、总体健康(t=17.552)、疼痛(t=19.695)、生理功能(t=20.998)方面的生活质量评分均比对照组高(均为P<0.05);研究组患者手术操作耗时(t=16.332)、骨折愈合时间(t=17.928)、住院时间(t=15.489)均比对照组短,且研究组患者术中出血量更少(t=18.032)(均为P<0.05);研究组手术切口感染、骨折不愈合、内固定外露、愈合后踝关节疼痛的总发生率为8.3%,对照组为28.3%,对比发现研究组的发生率更低(χ2=7.002,P<0.05);研究组患者踝关节功能术后的优良率比对照组更高(χ2=7.009,P<0.05)。

结论

经皮螺钉内固定微创手术治疗踝关节骨折,踝关节功能恢复良好,可提升患者QOL评分,促进骨折愈合,减少住院时间,提升预后效果,临床感染率低,有临床推广价值。

Objective

To investigate the effect of minimally invasive surgery with percutaneous screw internal fixation on patients with ankle fractures and the effect on the quality of life(QOL)scores.

Methods

From January 2015 to October 2019, 120 patients with ankle fractures who were admitted to Yufu People's Hospital for treatment during this time period were selected. The envelope method was used to divide the patients into the control group and the study group, 60 cases each. All the patients in the group were treated with surgery. The control group was treated with traditional incision and reduction and internal fixation. The study group was treated with minimally invasive surgery with percutaneous screw internal fixation. The quality of life(QOL)scores, the clinical status of the two groups, the prognosis of the two groups of patients, and the ankle function recovery of the two groups were compared. Chi-square test and t test were applied for data analysis.

Results

The quality of life scores of patients in the study group were higher than those in the control group in terms of social function, psychological function, emotional intelligence, cognitive function, physical function, overall health, pain and physiological function (t=16.332, 15.663, 17.452, 17.998, 18.552, 17.552, 19.695 and 20.998 respectively, all P <0.05); the operation time, fracture healing time and hospitalization time of patients in the study group were all higher than those in the control group Compared with the control group, the patients in the study group had less intraoperative bleeding (t=16.332, 17.928, 15.489, 18.032, respectively, all P <0.05); the total incidence of ankle joint pain in the study group was 8.3% after surgical incision infection, nonunion of fracture, exposure of internal fixation, and healing, compared with 28.3% in the control group, the incidence in the study group was lower (χ2=7.002, P<0.05). The patients in the study group had ankle joint pain.The excellent and good rate of postoperative joint function was higher than that of the control group(χ2=7.009, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The use of percutaneous screw internal fixation for minimally invasive surgery in patients with ankle fractures can improve the ankle joint function, improve the QOL score of patients, promote fracture healing, reduce hospitalization time, and improve prognosis and clinical infection.

表1 两组术后生活质量评分对比[分,(±s)]
表2 两组临床指标状况对比(±s)
表3 两组预后状况对比[例(%)]
表4 两组患者踝关节功能恢复状况对比[例(%)]
[1]
刘建恒,张巍,张晓勇,等.微创经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗强直性脊柱炎合并胸腰椎骨折的疗效[J].中华创伤杂志,2018,34(2): 109-115.
[2]
阎海威,胡居正,杨英,等.微创经皮骨盆前环内固定治疗不稳定性前环损伤的疗效及早期并发症分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2019,39(13): 826-832.
[3]
Kasture S, Azurza K. Triplane ankle fracture with concomitant ipsilateral shaft of tibia fracture: case report and review of literature[J]. J Orthop Case Rep, 2017, 7(3): 84-87.
[4]
洪石,吴征杰,李雪,等.骨科机器人辅助下经皮螺钉内固定治疗骨盆与髋臼骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(1): 16-21.
[5]
李迎全,陈多军,王飞,等.微创经皮接骨板技术术中双反牵引复位在胫骨中远段粉碎性骨折中的应用效果分析[J].临床外科杂志,2019,22(7): 600-602.
[6]
唐春晖,姚高文,王林,等. 骨盆环微创内固定治疗骨盆C型骨折[J].中国骨伤,2017, 30(7): 660-663.
[7]
Weinraub GM, Levine P, Shi E, et al. Comparison of medial malleolar fracture healing at 8 weeks after open reduction internal fixation versus percutaneous fixation: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2017, 56(2): 277-281.
[8]
王远政,李波,郭涛,等.骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎经皮椎体后凸成形术后手术椎体再骨折的疗效分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2017,33(11): 1005-1010.
[9]
付海平,王飞.经皮微创治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床效果[J].中国医药导报,2019,54(14): 104-108.
[10]
崔勇,段广斌.微创经皮钢板内固定技术联合锁定加压接骨板治疗老年股骨中下段骨折临床效果[J].中国药物与临床,2019,32(12): 2075-2077.
[11]
余新平,刘康,王金军,等.腓骨后外侧入路联合微创经皮钢板内固定技术治疗胫腓骨远端A3型骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2017,19(3): 207-212.
[12]
王怀东,第五勇刚.经皮微创锁定钢板内固定治疗VancouverB1型股骨假体周围骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2019,85(3): 345-347.
[13]
Kasture S, Azurza K. Triplane ankle fracture with concomitant ipsilateral shaft of tibia fracture: case report and review of literature[J]. J Orthop Case Rep, 2017, 7(3): 84-87.
[14]
Mani KCK, Acharya P, Raj RCD, et al. A modified minimally invasive technique for intra-articular displaced calcaneal fractures fixed by transverse and axial screws[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg, 2017, 27(12): 1-8.
[15]
刘晓军.微创经皮锁定加压钢板内固定对四肢骨折患者术后视觉模拟评分及骨折愈合时间的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2019,23(5): 593-595.
[16]
车荟,马成,李游,等.终板破裂对微创经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折疗效影响的研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(6): 492-498.
[17]
陈传江,常恒,李陵江,等.正中小切口减压结合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定术在胸腰椎压缩性骨折中的应用[J].中国临床研究,2017,30(12): 1624-1626.
[18]
王远政,李波,郭涛,等.骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎经皮椎体后凸成形术后手术椎体再骨折的疗效分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2017,33(11): 1005-1010.
[19]
阎海威,胡居正,杨英,等.微创经皮骨盆前环内固定治疗不稳定性前环损伤的疗效及早期并发症分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2019,39(13): 826-832.
[20]
刘曦明,吴刚,蔡贤华.经皮骶髂关节内固定准确置钉的挑战与思考[J].中华创伤杂志,2018,34(6): 481-483.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[8] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[9] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[10] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[11] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[12] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[13] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[14] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要