切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 154 -158. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.02.005

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

经皮螺钉内固定微创手术在踝关节骨折的短期疗效
王华国1,(), 邹仲兵1, 林伟鹏1, 黄永锋1, 欧荣通1, 陈桂全1, 叶劲1   
  1. 1. 527300 云浮市人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-10 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王华国

Short-term effects of minimally invasive surgery with percutaneous screw fixation on ankle fractures

Huaguo Wang1,(), Zhongbing Zou1, Weipeng Lin1, Yongfeng Huang1, Rongtong Ou1, Guiquan Chen1, Jin Ye1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Yunfu People's Hospital, Yunfu 527300, China
  • Received:2020-01-10 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Huaguo Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Huaguo, Email:
引用本文:

王华国, 邹仲兵, 林伟鹏, 黄永锋, 欧荣通, 陈桂全, 叶劲. 经皮螺钉内固定微创手术在踝关节骨折的短期疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 154-158.

Huaguo Wang, Zhongbing Zou, Weipeng Lin, Yongfeng Huang, Rongtong Ou, Guiquan Chen, Jin Ye. Short-term effects of minimally invasive surgery with percutaneous screw fixation on ankle fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 154-158.

目的

探讨经皮螺钉内固定微创手术治疗踝关节骨折的效果及其对患者生活质量评分(QOL)的影响。

方法

根据纳入排除标准,选取120例2015年1月至2019年10月在云浮市人民医院治疗踝关节骨折的患者。纳入标准:确诊为新鲜闭合性踝关节骨折;临床资料完整;非Pilon或粉碎性骨折。排除标准:对本研究所涉术式存在禁忌证;下胫腓关节分离;压缩性、粉碎性骨折;心脑血管病变者,重要器官功能异常及恶性肿瘤;精神功能障碍。应用信封法分组为对照组(60例)和研究组(60例)两组,两组患者均实施手术治疗,对照组使用传统切开复位内固定术治疗,研究组使用经皮螺钉内固定微创手术进行治疗。对比两组患者生活质量(QOL)评分、两组临床指标状况、两组患者预后状况以及对比两组患者踝关节功能恢复状况。计量资料采用t检验,计数资料使用卡方检验。

结果

研究组患者在社会功能(t=16.332)、心理功能(t=15.663)、情感智能(t=17.452)、认知功能(t=17.998)、躯体功能(t=18.552)、总体健康(t=17.552)、疼痛(t=19.695)、生理功能(t=20.998)方面的生活质量评分均比对照组高(均为P<0.05);研究组患者手术操作耗时(t=16.332)、骨折愈合时间(t=17.928)、住院时间(t=15.489)均比对照组短,且研究组患者术中出血量更少(t=18.032)(均为P<0.05);研究组手术切口感染、骨折不愈合、内固定外露、愈合后踝关节疼痛的总发生率为8.3%,对照组为28.3%,对比发现研究组的发生率更低(χ2=7.002,P<0.05);研究组患者踝关节功能术后的优良率比对照组更高(χ2=7.009,P<0.05)。

结论

经皮螺钉内固定微创手术治疗踝关节骨折,踝关节功能恢复良好,可提升患者QOL评分,促进骨折愈合,减少住院时间,提升预后效果,临床感染率低,有临床推广价值。

Objective

To investigate the effect of minimally invasive surgery with percutaneous screw internal fixation on patients with ankle fractures and the effect on the quality of life(QOL)scores.

Methods

From January 2015 to October 2019, 120 patients with ankle fractures who were admitted to Yufu People's Hospital for treatment during this time period were selected. The envelope method was used to divide the patients into the control group and the study group, 60 cases each. All the patients in the group were treated with surgery. The control group was treated with traditional incision and reduction and internal fixation. The study group was treated with minimally invasive surgery with percutaneous screw internal fixation. The quality of life(QOL)scores, the clinical status of the two groups, the prognosis of the two groups of patients, and the ankle function recovery of the two groups were compared. Chi-square test and t test were applied for data analysis.

Results

The quality of life scores of patients in the study group were higher than those in the control group in terms of social function, psychological function, emotional intelligence, cognitive function, physical function, overall health, pain and physiological function (t=16.332, 15.663, 17.452, 17.998, 18.552, 17.552, 19.695 and 20.998 respectively, all P <0.05); the operation time, fracture healing time and hospitalization time of patients in the study group were all higher than those in the control group Compared with the control group, the patients in the study group had less intraoperative bleeding (t=16.332, 17.928, 15.489, 18.032, respectively, all P <0.05); the total incidence of ankle joint pain in the study group was 8.3% after surgical incision infection, nonunion of fracture, exposure of internal fixation, and healing, compared with 28.3% in the control group, the incidence in the study group was lower (χ2=7.002, P<0.05). The patients in the study group had ankle joint pain.The excellent and good rate of postoperative joint function was higher than that of the control group(χ2=7.009, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The use of percutaneous screw internal fixation for minimally invasive surgery in patients with ankle fractures can improve the ankle joint function, improve the QOL score of patients, promote fracture healing, reduce hospitalization time, and improve prognosis and clinical infection.

表1 两组术后生活质量评分对比[分,(±s)]
表2 两组临床指标状况对比(±s)
表3 两组预后状况对比[例(%)]
表4 两组患者踝关节功能恢复状况对比[例(%)]
[1]
刘建恒,张巍,张晓勇,等.微创经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗强直性脊柱炎合并胸腰椎骨折的疗效[J].中华创伤杂志,2018,34(2): 109-115.
[2]
阎海威,胡居正,杨英,等.微创经皮骨盆前环内固定治疗不稳定性前环损伤的疗效及早期并发症分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2019,39(13): 826-832.
[3]
Kasture S, Azurza K. Triplane ankle fracture with concomitant ipsilateral shaft of tibia fracture: case report and review of literature[J]. J Orthop Case Rep, 2017, 7(3): 84-87.
[4]
洪石,吴征杰,李雪,等.骨科机器人辅助下经皮螺钉内固定治疗骨盆与髋臼骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(1): 16-21.
[5]
李迎全,陈多军,王飞,等.微创经皮接骨板技术术中双反牵引复位在胫骨中远段粉碎性骨折中的应用效果分析[J].临床外科杂志,2019,22(7): 600-602.
[6]
唐春晖,姚高文,王林,等. 骨盆环微创内固定治疗骨盆C型骨折[J].中国骨伤,2017, 30(7): 660-663.
[7]
Weinraub GM, Levine P, Shi E, et al. Comparison of medial malleolar fracture healing at 8 weeks after open reduction internal fixation versus percutaneous fixation: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2017, 56(2): 277-281.
[8]
王远政,李波,郭涛,等.骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎经皮椎体后凸成形术后手术椎体再骨折的疗效分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2017,33(11): 1005-1010.
[9]
付海平,王飞.经皮微创治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床效果[J].中国医药导报,2019,54(14): 104-108.
[10]
崔勇,段广斌.微创经皮钢板内固定技术联合锁定加压接骨板治疗老年股骨中下段骨折临床效果[J].中国药物与临床,2019,32(12): 2075-2077.
[11]
余新平,刘康,王金军,等.腓骨后外侧入路联合微创经皮钢板内固定技术治疗胫腓骨远端A3型骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2017,19(3): 207-212.
[12]
王怀东,第五勇刚.经皮微创锁定钢板内固定治疗VancouverB1型股骨假体周围骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2019,85(3): 345-347.
[13]
Kasture S, Azurza K. Triplane ankle fracture with concomitant ipsilateral shaft of tibia fracture: case report and review of literature[J]. J Orthop Case Rep, 2017, 7(3): 84-87.
[14]
Mani KCK, Acharya P, Raj RCD, et al. A modified minimally invasive technique for intra-articular displaced calcaneal fractures fixed by transverse and axial screws[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg, 2017, 27(12): 1-8.
[15]
刘晓军.微创经皮锁定加压钢板内固定对四肢骨折患者术后视觉模拟评分及骨折愈合时间的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2019,23(5): 593-595.
[16]
车荟,马成,李游,等.终板破裂对微创经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折疗效影响的研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(6): 492-498.
[17]
陈传江,常恒,李陵江,等.正中小切口减压结合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定术在胸腰椎压缩性骨折中的应用[J].中国临床研究,2017,30(12): 1624-1626.
[18]
王远政,李波,郭涛,等.骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎经皮椎体后凸成形术后手术椎体再骨折的疗效分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2017,33(11): 1005-1010.
[19]
阎海威,胡居正,杨英,等.微创经皮骨盆前环内固定治疗不稳定性前环损伤的疗效及早期并发症分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2019,39(13): 826-832.
[20]
刘曦明,吴刚,蔡贤华.经皮骶髂关节内固定准确置钉的挑战与思考[J].中华创伤杂志,2018,34(6): 481-483.
[1] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[2] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[3] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[4] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[5] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[6] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[7] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[8] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[9] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[10] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[11] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[12] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要