切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 659 -664. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.06.002

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

初次髋膝关节置换术后假体周围感染的病原学研究
陈志1, 林佳俊1, 刘文革1, 周宗科2,(), 沈彬2, 杨静2, 康鹏德2, 裴福兴2   
  1. 1. 350001 福州,福建医科大学附属协和医院
    2. 650041 成都,四川大学华西医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-07 出版日期:2019-12-01
  • 通信作者: 周宗科
  • 基金资助:
    卫生部卫生行业科研专项(201302007)

Analysis of microbiology, antibiotic susceptibility and antibiotic treatment in prosthetic hip and knee infection

Zhi Chen1, Jiajun Lin1, Wenge Liu1, Zongke Zhou2,(), Bin Shen2, Jing Yang2, Pengde Kang2, Fuxing Pei2   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China
    2. Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 650041, China
  • Received:2019-03-07 Published:2019-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Zongke Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Zongke, Email:
引用本文:

陈志, 林佳俊, 刘文革, 周宗科, 沈彬, 杨静, 康鹏德, 裴福兴. 初次髋膝关节置换术后假体周围感染的病原学研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 659-664.

Zhi Chen, Jiajun Lin, Wenge Liu, Zongke Zhou, Bin Shen, Jing Yang, Pengde Kang, Fuxing Pei. Analysis of microbiology, antibiotic susceptibility and antibiotic treatment in prosthetic hip and knee infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(06): 659-664.

目的

为有效预防及治疗感染,研究髋膝关节置换术后假体周围感染的病原菌构成与耐药率的变化趋势,评价抗感染方案的治疗效果。

方法

收集华西医院骨科自2010年至2015年收治的初次髋、膝关节置换术后假体周围感染病例的相关资料。统计培养阳性率、病原菌构成与耐药率,分析病原菌构成与耐药率的变化趋势及不同抗感染方案的治疗效果。

结果

共146例纳入研究,髋、膝关节置换术后假体周围感染分别为111例和35例,培养阳性率为73.97%,病原菌以革兰阳性菌为主,占55.48%,其中表皮葡萄球菌及金黄色葡萄球菌所占比例最高,分别为25.34%及15.07%;革兰阴性菌占13.01%,其中阴沟肠杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌及大肠埃希菌分别占4.79%、3.42%及2.05%。革兰阳性菌对利福平、利奈唑胺、万古霉素等较敏感,革兰阴性菌对阿米卡星、亚胺培南及头孢吡肟有较高的敏感性,但病原菌对β-内酰胺类、庆大霉素、克林霉素及部分喹诺酮类抗菌药物的耐药率较高。经验性抗感染方案多选择静脉使用万古霉素联合头孢菌素、左氧氟沙星或克林霉素,续以口服头孢克洛或头孢克洛联合利福平。对于培养阳性的病例,则根据药敏结果使用敏感抗菌药物。

结论

目前假体周围感染的培养阴性率较高,应规范术前抗菌药物使用及标本的采集与培养,以提高检出率。病原菌谱复杂,以革兰阳性菌为主,病原菌对多种抗菌药物具有较高耐药性。经验性抗感染方案的抗菌谱应覆盖革兰阳性菌,尤其是葡萄球菌,待病原菌明确后需根据药敏结果制定个体化的抗感染方案。

Objective

To explore the microbiology and antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria isolated from infected joint after total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty and assess the antibiotic treatment options for prosthetic joint infection.

Methods

The microbiology, antimicrobial susceptibility and antibiotic treatment data of prosthetic hip and knee infection patients in West China Hospital between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015 were retrospective reviewed and analyzed.

Results

A total of 146 patients were identified, 111 cases were prosthetic hip infection and 35 cases were prosthetic knee infection, and the prevalence of culture negative was 26.03%. Gram-positive bacteria were the main pathogen, encountered 55.48%. The most common organisms were staphylococcus epidermidis (25.34%) and staphylococcus aureus (15.07%). Gram-negative isolates encountered 13.01%, and Escherichia coli (6.85%) was the most common causative organism, followed by enterobacter cloacae (4.79%) and pseudomonas aereginasa (3.42%). The results of antibiotic susceptibility showed gentamicin, clindamycin, beta-lactanm antibiotics were poorly susceptibe to gram-positive isolates, but they were sensitive to antibiotic such as rifampin, linezolid, furantoin, quinupristin and vancomycin. Antibiotic such as amikacin and imipenem were sentive to Gram-negative bacteria, but gentamicin, tobramycin and cephalosporins had high resistance rate. Empirical antibiotic treatment should combined vancomycin and ceftriaxone, fluroquinolone or clindamycin. When the pathogen was confirmed, the treatment should be individualized.

Conclusions

The prevalence of culture negative was still very high. The dominate pathogen was Gram-positive bacteria, and the most common organisms were Staphylococcus Epidermidis and Staphylococcus Aureus. The empirical antibiotic should cover the Gram-positive isolate, especially the staphyloccus. When the pathogen was confirmed, the treatment should be individualized, taking into account the infection organism and results of antibiotic susceptibility.

表1 患者的一般资料(例)
表2 病原菌分布及构成比[例(%)]
表3 革兰阳性菌对抗菌药物的耐药率(%)
表4 革兰阴性菌对抗菌药物的耐药率(%)
表5 针对不同病原菌的抗感染方案
[1]
陈志,周宗科.髋、膝关节置换术后假体周围感染的诊治进展[J].实用骨科杂志,2017,23(3):247-251.
[2]
Willis-Owen CA, Konyves A, Martin DK. Factors affecting the incidence of infection in hip and knee replacement an analysis of 5277 cases[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2010, 92B(8): 1128-1133.
[3]
Kapadia BH, Berg RA, Daley JA. Periprosthetic joint infection[J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10016): 386-394.
[4]
Font-Vizcarra L, Garcia S, Martinez-Pastor JC, et al. Blood culture flasks for culturing synovial fluid in prosthetic joint infections[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(8): 2238-2243.
[5]
陈志,周宗科,沈彬,等.急性、迟发性、慢性假体周围感染的诊病原学特征及疗效分析[J].实用骨科杂志,2019,25(4):313-316.
[6]
Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the workgroup of the musculoskeletal infection society[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(11): 2992-2994.
[7]
Parvizi J, Erkocak OF, Della Valle CJ. Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014, 96(5): 430-436.
[8]
Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, et al. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(7): 654-663.
[9]
Malhas AM, Lawton R, Reidy M, et al. Causative organisms in revision total hip & knee arthroplasty for infection: Increasing multi-antibiotic resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococcus and the implications for antibiotic prophylaxis[J]. Surgeon, 2015, 13(5): 250-255.
[10]
Tsai JC, Sheng WH, Lo WY, et al. Clinical characteristics, microbiology, and outcomes of prosthetic joint infection in Taiwan[J]. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2015, 48(2): 198-204.
[11]
Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2013, 56(1): e1-e25.
[12]
Anguita-Alonso P, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, et al. High rate of aminoglycoside resistance among staphylococci causing prosthetic joint infection[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005, 10(439): 43-47.
[13]
Papadopoulos A, Ribera A, Mavrogenis AM. (MDR)and extensively drug resistant(XDR)Gram negative prosthetic joint infections(PJI): role of surgery and impact of colistin administration[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2019, 53(3): 294-301.
[14]
Finley R, Glass-Kaastra SK, Hutchinson JA, et al. Declines in outpatient antimicrobial use in Canada (1995-2010)[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(10): e76398.
[15]
Marschall J, Lane MA, Beekmann SE, et al. Current management of prosthetic joint infections in adults: results of an emerging infections network survey[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2013, 41(3): 272-277.
[16]
Dubee V, Zeller V, Lhotellier L, et al. Continuous high-dose vancomycin combination therapy for methicillin-resistant staphylococcal prosthetic hip infection: a prospective cohort study[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2013, 19(2): E98-E105.
[17]
Tande AJ, Gomez-Urena EO, Berbari EF, et al. Management of prosthetic joint infection [J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2017,31(2): 237-252.
[18]
Van Erp, Heineken AC, Van Wensen RJA, et al. Optimization of the empirical antibiotic choice during the treatment of acute prosthetic joint infections: a retrospective analysis of 91 patients [J]. Acta Orthop, 2019,90(5):455-459.
[19]
Ascione T, Balato G, Mariconda M, et al. Continuous antibiotic therapy can reduce recurrence of prosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing 2-stage exchange [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2019,34(4):704-709.
[20]
Sousa R, Abreu MA. Treatment of prosthetic joint infection with debridement, antibiotics and irrigation with implant retention-a narrative review [J]. J Bone Jt Infect, 2018,3(3): 108-117.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[3] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[4] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[5] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[6] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[7] 贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[8] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[9] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[10] 李静静, 翟蕾, 赵海平, 郑波. 多囊肾合并囊肿的多重耐药菌感染一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 920-923.
[11] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[12] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
[13] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[14] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
[15] 杨艳丽, 陈昱, 赵若辰, 杜伟, 马海娟, 许珂, 张莉芸. 系统性红斑狼疮合并血流感染的危险因素及细菌学分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 694-699.
阅读次数
全文


摘要