切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 114 -117. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.01.021

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

尺骨茎突骨折愈合对桡骨远端骨折术后关节功能影响
牛学刚1, 许良2,()   
  1. 1. 252000 聊城,山东省聊城市中医医院骨创伤科
    2. 250031 济南,山东省医学科学院附属医院骨外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-17 出版日期:2019-02-01
  • 通信作者: 许良

Effect of healing of ulnar styloid process fracture on wrist joint function after radius distal fracture surgery

Xuegang Niu1, Liang Xu2,()   

  1. 1. Trauma department of orthopedics, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Liaocheng, Liaocheng 252000, China
    2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250031, China
  • Received:2018-01-17 Published:2019-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Liang Xu
  • About author:
    corresponding author: Xu Liang, Email:
引用本文:

牛学刚, 许良. 尺骨茎突骨折愈合对桡骨远端骨折术后关节功能影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 114-117.

Xuegang Niu, Liang Xu. Effect of healing of ulnar styloid process fracture on wrist joint function after radius distal fracture surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 114-117.

目的

观察尺骨茎突骨折愈合情况短期内对桡骨远端骨折内固定术后腕关节功能的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2012年6月至2013年6月于聊城市中医医院收治的136例单侧不稳定的桡骨远端骨折伴尺骨茎突骨折患者的临床资料,所有患者均采用锁定钢板固定桡骨骨折,根据尺骨茎突骨折愈合情况将患者分为尺骨茎突骨折愈合组(愈合组,n=43)和尺骨茎突骨折未愈合组(未愈合组,n=93)。根据术后X线正侧位片测量并记录患者桡骨高度(桡骨茎突与尺骨茎突之差)、掌倾角、尺偏角,评价桡骨骨折复位、愈合情况和尺骨茎突愈合情况,记录腕关节尺侧旋转疼痛的患者数量。末次随访时采用Gartlant-Werley评分和臂肩手功能障碍评分(DASH)评分评估腕关节功能,测定并记录腕关节的活动范围及握力。性别、骨折类型等计数资料比较采用卡方检验,时间、DASH评分等计量资料比较采用t检验。

结果

两组患者在年龄、性别、受伤至手术时间、骨折内固定研究学会(AO)骨折分型、受伤侧别和致伤原因方面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。尺骨茎突骨折愈合组尺侧旋转疼痛有18例(41.9%),而未愈合组有40例(43.0%),差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.021,P>0.05)。两组患者的住院时间、桡骨骨折愈合时间、掌倾角、尺偏角和桡骨高度方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。两组患者背伸、掌曲、桡偏、尺偏、握力和DASH评分、Gartlant-Werley评分和优良率方面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

尺骨茎突骨折愈合情况在短期内对桡骨远端骨折内固定术后腕关节功能的康复无明显影响。

Objective

To observe the effect of healing of ulnar styloid fracture in short term on wrist function after internal fixation of distal radius fracture.

Methods

The clinical data of 136 patients with unstable unilateral distal radius fractures and ulnar styloid process fractures admitted in Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Liaocheng from June 2012 to June 2013, were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were treated with locking plate for radius fracture. According to the healing status of ulnar styloid process, the patients were divided into group A (the ulnar styloid fracture healed, n=43) and group B (ulnar styloid fracture did not heal, n=93). According to the postoperative X-ray radiographs, the height of the radius (the difference between the radial styloid process and the ulnar styloid process), the angle of the palm, and the deviation of the radius were recorded; the healing of the radial fracture and the healing status of the ulnar styloid process were evaluated. The number of patients with ulnar joint rotation pain was also recorded. At the last follow-up, the Gartlant-Werley score and the disabilites of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score were used to assess the wrist function, and the range and wrist of the wrist were measured and recorded. The counting data were compared byChi-square test and the measurement data were compared by t test.

Results

There was no significant difference in age, sex, injury to operation time, fracture classification, injury side or cause of injury between the two groups (P >0.05). There were 18 cases (41.9%) of ulnar joint rotation pain in group A and 40 cases (43.0%) in group B, the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=1.021, P >0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay, fracture healing time, palm tilt angle, ulnar angle or radius height of the two groups (P >0.05). There was no significant difference in Gartlant-Werley score or the excellent and good rate between the two groups (P >0.05).

Conclusion

The healing of ulnar styloid process may not be affected in the short term on the rehabilitation of wrist joint after distal radius fracture fixation.

表1 两组基线特征比较
表2 两组患者的住院时间、桡骨骨折愈合时间、掌倾角、尺偏角和桡骨高度比较(±s)
表3 两组患者的腕关节功能和DASH评分比较(±s)
表4 两组患者Gartlant-Werley评分和优良率比较[例(%)]
[1]
Daneshvar P, Chan R, Macdermid J, et al. The effects of ulnar styloid fractures on patients sustaining distal radius fractures[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2014, 39(10): 1915-1920.
[2]
沈伟华.手术治疗右肘腕关节复杂损伤病例1则 [J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):110-114.
[3]
Gong HS, Cho HE, Kim J, et al. Surgical treatment of acute distal radioulnar joint instability associated with distal radius fractures[J]. J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 2015, 40(8): 783-789.
[4]
Fullilove S, Gozzard C. Dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius:a critical appraisal of the DRAFFT (distal radius acute fracture fixation trial) study [J]. Bone Joint J, 2016, 98B(3): 298-300.
[5]
Yilmaz S, Cankaya D, Karakus D. Ulnar styloid fracture has no impact on the outcome but decreases supination strength after conservative treatment of distal radial fracture[J]. J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 2015, 40(8): 872-873.
[6]
简小飞,陈廖斌,王华.尺骨茎突骨折及分型对复杂桡骨远端骨折钢板内固定术后疗效的影响[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2014,16(10):918-920.
[7]
张超,谢雪涛,胡顺东,等.尺骨茎突骨折对桡骨远端骨折内固定术后腕关节功能的影响[J].国际骨科学杂志,2016,18(4):264-266.
[8]
鲍飞龙,刘涛,胡义明,等.桡骨远端乙状切迹背侧骨块不同治疗对腕关节功能恢复的探讨[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(5):673-678.
[1] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[2] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[3] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[4] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[5] 刘丹丹, 宋鸣, 李霞, 徐夏君. 老年髋部骨折术后便秘的影响因素及其列线图预测模型[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 607-612.
[6] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[7] 陈志超, 张志伟, 蒋勰, 顾祖超, 蒋菁芸, 许婷婷. 带线锚钉结合缝线捆扎固定髌骨下极粉碎性骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 732-735.
[8] 周春林, 韩元龙, 丁飞, 吴玮杰. 踝关节骨折内固定术后形态变化及功能影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 736-740.
[9] 浦路桥, 徐永清, 齐保闯, 施洪鑫, 林玮, 卜鹏飞, 白艳, 唐志方, 李川. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)计划书[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 747-750.
[10] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[11] 陈山林, 魏绮珮, 刘畅. 腕关节假体:路在何方?[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 469-475.
[12] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
[13] 金浪, 石洁, 黄正, 贾永伟, 张建坡, 魏礼成, 金昊雷. 3D打印数字技术辅助改良交叉PVP对重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折脊柱-骨盆矢状面平衡状态的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 263-268.
[14] 傅佰圣, 李庆虎, 王大伟, 陶扶林, 王永会. 扩髓清创联合单边外固定架治疗长骨骨折髓内钉术后慢性感染的研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 289-294.
[15] 杨鹏, 刘冲. PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间骨折后隐匿性失血及其危险因素的横断面研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 301-306.
阅读次数
全文


摘要