切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 6 -10. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.01.002

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

肩关节镜下360°关节囊松解治疗原发性冻结肩的中期疗效
王珂杰1, 徐鹏1, 丁文鸽1, 严伟洪1, 李欢1,()   
  1. 1. 213000 常州,苏州大学附属第三医院骨科;213000 常州,江苏省常州市第一人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-30 出版日期:2019-02-01
  • 通信作者: 李欢
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81272017); 常州市卫生计生委重大科技项目的资助(wz201514)

Mid term effects of 360 degrees arthroscopic capsular release for primary frozen shoulder

Kejie Wang1, Peng Xu1, Wenge Ding1, Weihong Yan1, Huan Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213000, China; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First People’s Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou 213000, China
  • Received:2016-08-30 Published:2019-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Huan Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Huan, Email:
引用本文:

王珂杰, 徐鹏, 丁文鸽, 严伟洪, 李欢. 肩关节镜下360°关节囊松解治疗原发性冻结肩的中期疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 6-10.

Kejie Wang, Peng Xu, Wenge Ding, Weihong Yan, Huan Li. Mid term effects of 360 degrees arthroscopic capsular release for primary frozen shoulder[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 6-10.

目的

探讨肩关节镜下360°关节囊松解术治疗原发性冻结肩的可行性与临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析自2010年1月至2014年8月苏州大学第三附属医院收治患者23例,其中男性8例,女性15例,所有患者术前排除颈椎病、胸廓出口综合症、肩部肿瘤等病变,排除肩部手术、创伤、外固定等继发性肩关节僵硬。手术方法为肩关节镜下360°关节囊松解,所有患者于治疗前后采用Constant肩关节功能评分和视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行疗效评估,并且评估患侧及健侧术前术后关节活动度。计量资料术前术后各不同时间点结果的比较采用配对t检验。

结果

所有手术均顺利完成,手术切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无相关并发症发生。所有患者中获得随访20例,平均年龄(58±10)岁,随访率86.7%。随访时间为24~79个月,平均(46±18)个月。术前患者Constant肩关节功能评分为(52.1±5.5),术前VAS评分为9(8,9)。术后3个月患者Constant肩关节功能评分为(90.2±1.3),VAS评分为1(1,2),二者与术前相比具有统计学差异,统计值分别为(t=38,P<0.05)(t=-4.0,P<0.01)。术后12个月患者Constant肩关节功能评分为(92.2±1.1)分,VAS评分为0(0,1),二者与术后3个月相比差异具有统计学意义(t =5.2,P < 0.05;t =-3.7,P < 0.01)。术后24个月患者Constant肩关节功能评分为(92.4±0.9)分,VAS评分为0(0,1),二者与术后12个月相比无统计学差异,统计值分别为(t=0.8,P>0.05)(t=-1.4,P > 0.05)。术后肩关节活动度较术前亦明显改善。

结论

关节镜下360°关节囊松解术治疗原发性冻结肩具有良好的中期临床疗效。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of 360 degrees arthroscopic capsular release for the treatment of primary frozen shoulder.

Methods

Twenty three patients with primary frozen shoulder from January 2010 to September 2014, including eight males and 15 females with an average age of (58±10) years were enrolled in this study. Cases with cervical spondylopathy, tumor, thoracic outlet syndrome as well as the secondary shoulder stiffness following shoulder injury, surgery or external fixation of shoulder were excluded. Arthroscopic capsular release was performed under general anesthesia in all patients. VAS pain score and Constant score of patients were assessed and compared before and after surgery by paired t test. The joint activity of the affected side was also analyzed.

Results

All the operations were successfully completed, the incisions healed well and no complications were observed. Twenty of 23 cases were followed up, accounting for a follow-up rate of 86.7%, with an average follow-up time of (46±18) months. The Constant score of shoulder three months after operation was (90.2±1.3) and the the VAS score was 1(1, 2); both were statistically significant compared with the preoperation data(t=38, P<0.05; Z=-4.0, P<0.01). The Constant score of shoulder 12 months after operation was (92.2±1.1) and the VAS score was 0(0, 1); both were statistically significant compared with preoperation state(t=5.2, P<0.05)(t=-3.7, P <0.01). The Constant score of shoulder 24 months after operation was (92.4±0.9) and the media of the VAS score was 0(0, 1); both were not statistically significant compared with preoperation data(t=0.8, t=-1.4, both P>0.05). The mean range of motion of forward flexion, abduction, external rotation and interal rotation also improved significantly postoperatively compared with preoperative ones.

Conclusion

Three hundred and sixty degrees arthroscopic capsule release is an effective method for the treatment of primary frozen shoulder of which the mid-term clinical effect is satisfied.

表1 手术前后肩关节活动度对比[n=20,°,(±s)]
表2 手术前后肩关节VAS及Constant评分对比(n=20)
[1]
Binder AI, Bulgen DY, Hazleman BL, et al. Frozen shoulder: a long-term prospective study[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 1984, 43(3): 361-364.
[2]
Shaffer B, Tibone JE, Kerlan RK. Frozen shoulder. A long-term follow-up[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1992, 74(5): 738-746.
[3]
Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1987, 214: 160-164.
[4]
Maund E, Craig D, Suekarran S, et al. Management of frozen shoulder: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis[J]. Health Technol Assess, 2012, 16(11): 261-264.
[5]
Prodromidis AD, Charalambous CP. Is there a genetic predisposition to frozen shoulder? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JBJS Rev, 2016, 4(2):1-9.
[6]
Zreik NH, Malik RA, Charalambous CP. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and diabetes: a meta-analysis of prevalence[J]. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J, 2016, 6(1): 26-34.
[7]
Itoi E, Arce G, Bain GI, et al. Shoulder stiffness: current concepts and concerns[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(7):1402-1414.
[8]
Arce G. Primary frozen shoulder syndrome: arthroscopic capsular release [J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2015, 4(6): e717-e720.
[9]
Rizk TE, Pinals RS. Frozen shoulder[J]. Semin Arthritis Rheum, 1982, 11(4): 440-452.
[10]
Mcgahan PJ, Patel H, Dickinson E, et al. The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(5): 658-665.
[11]
Izumi T, Aoki M, Tanaka Y, et al. Stretching positions for the coracohumeral ligament: strain measurement during passive motion using fresh/frozen cadaver shoulders[J]. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol, 2011, 3(1): 1-11.
[12]
Ozaki J, Nakagawa Y, Sakurai G, et al. Recalcitrant chronic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Role of contracture of the coracohumeral ligament and rotator interval in pathogenesis and treatment[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1989, 71(10): 1511-1515.
[13]
Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C, et al. Frozen shoulder: Mr arthrographic findings[J]. Radiology, 2004, 233(2): 486-492.
[14]
Park C, Lee S, Yi CW, et al. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on frozen shoulder patients' pain and functions[J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27(12): 3659-3661.
[15]
Favejee MM, Huisstede BM, Koes BW. Frozen shoulder: the effectiveness of conservative and surgical interventions-systematic review[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2011, 45(1): 49-56.
[16]
Saeidian SR, Hemmati AA, Haghighi MH. Pain relieving effect of short-course, pulse prednisolone in managing frozen shoulder[J]. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother, 2007, 21(1): 27-30.
[17]
Lorbach O, Anagnostakos K, Scherf C, et al. Nonoperative management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: oral cortisone application versus intra-articular cortisone injections[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010, 19(2): 172-179.
[18]
Loew M, Heichel TO, Lehner B. Intraarticular lesions in primary frozen shoulder after manipulation under general anesthesia[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2005, 14(1): 16-21.
[19]
Kivimäki J, Pohjolainen T, Malmivaara A, et al. Manipulation under anesthesia with home exercises versus home exercises alone in the treatment of frozen shoulder: a randomized, controlled trial with 125 patients[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 16(6): 722-726.
[20]
Snow M, Boutros I, Funk L. Posterior arthroscopic capsular release in frozen shoulder[J]. Arthroscopy, 2009, 25(1): 19-23.
[21]
Pollock RG, Duralde XA, Flatow EL, et al. The use of arthroscopy in the treatment of resistant frozen shoulder[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994, 304: 30-36.
[22]
Fernandes MR. Arthroscopic treatment of refractory adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder[J]. Rev Col Bras Cir, 2014, 41(1): 30-35.
[23]
Smith CD, Hamer P, Bunker TD. Arthroscopic capsular release for idiopathic frozen shoulder with intra-articular injection and a controlled manipulation[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2014, 96(1): 55-60.
[24]
Evans JP, Guyver PM, Smith CD. Frozen shoulder after simple arthroscopic shoulder procedures: what is the risk?[J]. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97-B(7): 963-966.
[25]
Segmüller HE, Taylor DE, Hogan CS, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of adhesive capsulitis[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 1995, 4(6): 403-408.
[26]
Bennett WF. Addressing glenohumeral stiffness while treating the painful and stiff shoulder arthroscopically[J]. Arthroscopy, 2000, 16(2): 142-150.
[27]
Chen J, Chen S, Li Y, et al. Is the extended release of the inferior glenohumeral ligament necessary for frozen shoulder?[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(4): 529-535.
[28]
Jerosch J. 360 degrees arthroscopic capsular release in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the glenohumeral joint-indication, surgical technique, results[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2001, 9(3): 178-186.
[29]
陆军,王宸.冻结肩的诊疗进展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(4):527-531.
[1] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[2] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[3] 肖志满, 龚煜, 谢景凌, 刘斌伟. 上下肢关节镜手术后患者下肢深静脉血栓发生的对比研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 601-606.
[4] 杨国栋, 张辉, 郭珈, 曲迪, 张静, 戚超. 外侧半月板后角撕裂是否修复的术后疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[5] 马鹏程, 刘伟, 张思平. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜手术中闭合关节囊的疗效影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 653-662.
[6] 陈宏兴, 张立军, 张勇, 李虎, 周驰, 凡一诺. 膝骨关节炎关节镜清理术后中药外用疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 663-672.
[7] 邢阳, 何爱珊, 康焱, 杨子波, 孟繁钢, 邬培慧. 前交叉韧带单束联合前外侧结构重建的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 508-519.
[8] 吴俊贤, 曾俊杰, 许有银, 苑博. 体外冲击波疗法辅助治疗肩袖修补术后关节僵硬[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 571-576.
[9] 齐伟亚, 方杰, 吴衡, 刘波. 掌侧小切口联合腕关节镜治疗AO-C型桡骨远端骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 577-582.
[10] 邬春虎, 马玉海, 陈长松, 尹华东, 朱晓峰, 何剑星, 刘彧. 冲击波联合富血小板血浆对骨关节炎软骨损伤的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 334-339.
[11] 张程, 何海军, 张光熠, 熊冰朗, 田天照, 孙诗艺, 吴子轩. 抗凝剂预防膝关节镜术后血栓发生的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 340-347.
[12] 李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 张星晨, 查国春, 郭开今. 改良加强减张无结缝线桥技术治疗肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 424-429.
[13] 刘延子, 王维军, 韩向东, 田学东. 保留残余腱束与残端重建前交叉韧带后外侧束[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 439-442.
[14] 杨大威, 张鑫. 肩关节上方悬吊复合体损伤研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 193-197.
[15] 张镇斌, 闫兆龙, 王功腾, 张文琦, 王旭凤, 李广兴, 孙华强, 李树锋. 关节镜对胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的效果研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 218-225.
阅读次数
全文


摘要