切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 478 -483. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.04.007

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

老龄髋关节置换术不同手术时机术后谵妄发生率的研究
陈小磊1, 吴春辉1,(), 麦绍声1, 李笑芬1   
  1. 1. 528305 佛山市顺德区第二人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-24 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 吴春辉

Relationship between delirium incidence and different operation timings of hip arthroplasty in elderly patients

Xiaolei Chen1, Chunhui Wu1,(), Shaosheng Mai1, Xiaofen Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Shunde Second People’s Hospital, Foshan 528305, China
  • Received:2017-08-24 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Chunhui Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Chunhui, Email:
引用本文:

陈小磊, 吴春辉, 麦绍声, 李笑芬. 老龄髋关节置换术不同手术时机术后谵妄发生率的研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 478-483.

Xiaolei Chen, Chunhui Wu, Shaosheng Mai, Xiaofen Li. Relationship between delirium incidence and different operation timings of hip arthroplasty in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 478-483.

目的

研究老龄患者髋关节置换术,手术时机不同对其术后谵妄发生率的影响。

方法

选择2013年2月至2017年2月在佛山市顺德区第二人民医院骨科,拟行髋关节置换手术的65岁以上患者83例,按手术方式分全髋关节置换(THR,39例)和股骨头置换(FHR,44例);采用随机数字表法患者按手术时机分为48 h后手术(C组)及48 h内手术(T组),最后分为THR-C组(25例)、THR-T组(14例)、FHR-C组(21例)、FHR-T组(23例)共4个研究组。均采用椎管内麻醉方式完成麻醉和手术。记录术前(Tp)、术中(T0)、术后1~3 d(T1~T3)生命体征指标,包括心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、指脉搏氧饱和度(SpO2),记录患者各时点疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS);应用谵妄评估量表中文修订版(CAM-CR)对患者在各时点谵妄情况进行评估,记录各时点谵妄发生例数。对计数资料和正态分布的计量资料采用卡方检验,非正态分布的数据采用秩和检验。

结果

术前各组患者均处于中重度疼痛(VAS为6~8),血压偏高(MAP 110~99 mmHg)(VAS:H=201.22;MAP:F=576.348,P<0.05)。术后3 d谵妄发生率:48 h内手术治疗者发生率低于48 h后手术者(THR-C vs THR-T:χ2=4.92;FHR-C vs. FHR-T:χ2=7.58,均为P<0.05),FHR者低于THR者(THR-C vs THR-T:χ2=4.27,P<0.05),其中THR-C组发生率最高,达56.0%,FHR-C组最低13.0%(χ2=7.877,P<0.05)。48 h内行手术治疗者住院天数较对照组48 h后手术者明显短(THR-C vs THR-T:F=6.892;FHR-C vs FHR-T:F=127.489,P<0.05),其中FHR-T组住院天数最短,为(14.8±7.6)d(F=214.086,P<0.05)。术中及术后各指标明显改善(VAS:H=201.22,MAP:F=576.348,P<0.05)。

结论

不同手术时机影响老龄髋关节置换术患者术后谵妄发生率,48 h内手术治疗能明显降低术后谵妄发生,缩短住院时间。

Objective

To study the effect of different timing of surgery on the incidence of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement.

Method

According to the criteria of admission, a total of 83 patients undergoing hip replacement over 65 years old were selected in Shunde Second People’s Hospital from February 2013 to February 2017. The total hip replacement group (THR, 39 cases) and the femoral head replacement group (FHR, 44 cases) were divided into the total hip replacement group. The patients of different operation method were divided into the control group (C) and the experimental group (T) according to the operation time (later than 48 h or earlier than 48 h after injury). Finally, four groups of THR-C(25 cases)、THR-T(14 cases)、FHR-C(21 cases)、FHR-T(23 cases) were obtained. Anesthesia and operation were performed by intraspinal anesthesia. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and surplus pulse O2(SpO2) were maintained before the operation (Tp), during the operation (T0) and three days after theoperation(T1~T3), and pain score (VAS) at each time point was recorded. The confusion assessment method- Chinese reversion (CAM-CR) for delirium was used to assess the delirium at each time point and record the number of delirium at each time point. Chi-square test or rank sum test were used to analyse the data.

Results

Before operation, all the patients were in moderate and severe pain (VAS: 6-8), high blood pressure (MAP: 110-99mmHg), and intraoperative and postoperative indexes improved significantly (VAS: H=201.22; MAP: F=576.348, P<0.05). The incidence of delirium on the 3rd day after operation: the delirium incidence of surgical treatment within 48 h was less than that late than 48 h (THR-C vs THR-T: χ2=4.92; FHR-C vs FHR-T: χ2=7.58, both P<0.05); and the delirium incidence of FHR was lower than that of THR (THR-C vs THR-T: χ2=4.27, P<0.05); among them, THR-C group had the highest incidence of 56.0%, while FHR-T group had the lowest incidence of 13.0% (χ2=7.877, P<0.05). The duration of hospitalization the patients operated within 48 h was significantly shorter than the patients operated late than 48 h(THR-C vs THR-T: F=6.892; FHR-C vs FHR-T: F=127.489, P<0.05); the FHR-T group had the shortest length of hospital stay(14.8±7.6)d(F=214.086, P<0.05). The length of hospital stay in the patients operated within 48 h was significantly shorter than the patients operated late than 48 h (THR: F=6.892; FHR: F=127.489, both P<0.05).

Conclusion

The incidence of postoperative delirium in the elderly patients with hip replacement is affected by the surgical timing, and surgical treatment within 48 h can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium and shorten the time of hospitalization.

表1 术前4组患者一般资料
表2 4组患者手术相关资料[M(P25P75)]
表3 4组患者不同时间点POD发生率[例(%)]
表4 4组患者各观察时点HR、SpO2、MAP、VAS评分比较
指标 组别 例数 Tp T0 T1 T2 T3 F P
HR[bpm,(±s)] THR-C组 25 86.6±10.8 74.2±13.5a 82.2±14.8 88.6±11.3 80.7±9.8 38.927 <0.01
THR-T组 14 84.3±18.8 76.6±15.5a 79.6±11.9 75.3±10.4a 82.1±15.8 17.048 <0.01
? FHR-C组 21 90.1±12.4 78.6±16.8a 80.6±13.2 86.6±10.8 80.5±16.1 19.865 <0.01
? FHR-T组 23 88.8±14.2 77.5±13.7a 78.1±9.6a 76.6±15.7a 72.6±16.8a 34.272 <0.01
? F ? 0.828 0.860 1.328 14.966 56.588 ? ?
? P ? >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 <0.01 <0.01 ? ?
指标 组别 例数 Tp T0 T1 T2 T3 H P
SpO2[%,M(P25P75)] THR-C组 25 94.0(92.0,95.0) 99.0(97.0,100.0)a 98.0(95.0,99.0)a 96.0(95.0,97.0)a 96.0(95.0,97.0) 92.942 <0.01
? THR-T组 14 95.0(93.0,97.0) 99.0(98.0,100.0)a 98.0(96.0,99.0)a 97.0(95.0,98.0)a 97.0(95.0,98.0)a 49.667 <0.01
? FHR-C组 21 94.0(93.0,96.0) 98.0(97.0,99.0)a 99.0(97.0,100.0)a 98.0(96.0,99.0)a 97.0(95.0,98.0)a 76.529 <0.01
? FHR-T组 23 96.0(92.0,98.0) 99.0(98.0,100.0)a 97.0(96.0,99.0)a 99.0(96.0,98.0)a 98.0(96.0,98)a 81.646 <0.01
? H ? 6.078 1.440 6.074 37.589 20.979 ? ?
? P ? <0.01 >0.05 >0.05 <0.01 <0.01 ? ?
指标 组别 例数 Tp T0 T1 T2 T3 F P
MAP[mmHg,(±s)] THR-C组 25 102.6±20.3 70.4±18.8a 80.6±10.8a 84.1±16.7a 76.9±11.2a 54.490 <0.01
THR-T组 14 110.1±28.9 76.6±30.7a 85.4±23.3a 90.6±35.3a 80.1±19.1a 19.825 <0.01
? FHR-C组 21 109.8±34.3 72.6±26.7a 79.2±19.5a 88.2±21.2a 74.6±20.1a 62.218 <0.01
? FHR-T组 23 99.6±18.6 80.1±20.4a 71.3±16.2a 75.5±17.1a 77.1±20.9a 62.318 <0.01
? F ? 1.709 1.400 12.581 20.343 1.193 ? ?
? P ? >0.05 >0.05 <0.01 <0.01 >0.05 ? ?
指标 组别 例数 Tp T0 T1 T2 T3 H P
VAS评分[M(P25P75)] THR-C组 25 7.0(6.0,8.0) 5.0(4.0,8.0)a 4.0(3.0,6.0)a 3.0(2.0,5.0)a 112.023 <0.01
THR-T组 14 7.0(6.0,8.0) 5.0(4.0,8.0)a 4.0(3.0,5.0)a 3.0(2.0,4.0)a 65.580 <0.01
? FHR-C组 21 8.0(6.0,9.0) 4.0(3.0,6.0)a 3.0(2.0,5.0)a 2.0(1.0,3.0)a 90.369 <0.01
? FHR-T组 23 8.0(6.0,9.0) 4.0(2.0,5.0)a 3.0(2.0,4.0)a 2.0(1.0,3.0)a 107.046 <0.01
? H ? 10.12 30.526 17.262 29.345 ? ?
? P ? <0.05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 ? ?
[1]
Rudolph JL, Inouye SK, Jones RN, et al. Delirium:an Independent predictor of functional decline after cardiac surgery[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2010, 58(4):643-649.
[2]
Aliberti S, Bellelli G, Belotti M, et al. Delirium symptoms during hospitalization predict long-term mortality in patients with severe pneumonia[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2015, 27(4):523-531.
[3]
Inouye SK, Robinson T, Blaum C, et al. Postoperative delirium in older adults:Best practice statement from the American geriatrics society[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015, 220(2):136-148.
[4]
喻任,陆纯德,程艳,等.高龄髋部骨折患者术后谵妄危险因素调查[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2016,31(4):341-344.
[5]
Lee JK, Park YS. Delirium after spinal surgery in Korean population[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(18):1729-1732.
[6]
O’mahony R, Murthy L, Akunne A, et al. Synopsis of the National institute for health and clinical excellence guideline for prevention of delirium[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2011, 154(11):746-751.
[7]
Shehabi Y, Riker RR, Bokersch PM, et al. Delium dura-tion and mortality in lightly sedated,mechanically ventila-ted intensive care patients[J]. Crit Care Med, 2010, 38(12):2311-2318.
[8]
贾佩玉,郭勇,王学敏,等.老年患者髋部骨折术后谵妄的危险因素分析[J].上海医学,2016,39(8):477-481.
[9]
郑文迪,赵亮,王玉强,等.骨科手术时间与术后谵妄的相关性的Meta分析[J].河南医学研究,2016,25(10):1750-1753.
[10]
郑强,魏彭辉,李建军,等.乌司他丁对老年患者髋部骨折术后谵妄的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2017,33(3):236-239.
[11]
王珏,郑海燕,杨方涛,等.托烷司琼对老年髋关节置换术后患者术后谵妄的影响[J].温州医科大学学报,2016,46-47(10):756-758.
[12]
骆洪涛,王金强.生理功能和手术应激评分系统评估髋部骨折手术风险的临床价值[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2017,1(6):613-615.
[13]
骆洪涛,郑力通.欧洲五维健康量表评估老年髋部骨折术后生活质量变化的研究[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2015,2(10):735-737.
[14]
Kyziridis TC. Post-operative delirium after hip fracture treatment-a review of the current literature[J].Psychosoc Med,2006,3:1-12.
[15]
Lee KH, Ha YC, Lee YK, et al. Frequency,risk factors,and prognosis of prolonged delirium in elderly patients after hip fracture surgery[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(9):2612-2620.
[16]
Gustafson Y. Postoperative delirium--a challenge for the orthopedic team[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 2004, 75(4):375-377.
[17]
Mazzola P, Bellelli G, Broggini VA, et al. Postoperative delirium and pre-fracture disability predict 6-month mortality among the oldest old hip fracture patients[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2015, 27(1):53-60.
[18]
Zenilman ME. Delirium an important postoperative complication[J]. JAMA, 2017, 317(1):77-78.
[19]
Fong TG, Tulebaev SR, Inouye SK. Delirium in elderly adults: diagnosis, prevention and treatment[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2009, 5(4):210-220.
[20]
Mcdaniel M, Brudney C. Postoperative delirium: etiology and management[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2012, 18(4):372-376.
[1] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[2] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[3] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[4] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[5] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[6] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[7] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[8] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[9] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[10] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[11] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[12] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[13] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[14] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要