切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 52 -57. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.01.010

所属专题: 文献

基础论著

吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶和叉状头转录因子3在骨肉瘤中表达与预后的关系
郑传禧1, 张世权2,(), 万鹏2, 郑建荣2, 关弘3   
  1. 1. 518035 深圳市第二人民医院骨关节骨肿瘤科
    3. 518035 深圳市第二人民医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-15 出版日期:2018-02-01
  • 通信作者: 张世权
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市卫生计生系统科研项目(201501014)

Expression and significance of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase and forkhead box P3 in osteosarcoma

Chuanxi Zheng1, Shiquan Zhang2,(), Peng Wan2, Jianrong Zheng2, Hong Guan3   

  1. 1. Department of joint and musculoskeletal tumor, the Second People Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518035, China; Department of pathology, the Second People Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518035, China
    2. Department of joint and musculoskeletal tumor, the Second People Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518035, China
  • Received:2016-12-15 Published:2018-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Shiquan Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Shiquan, Email:
引用本文:

郑传禧, 张世权, 万鹏, 郑建荣, 关弘. 吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶和叉状头转录因子3在骨肉瘤中表达与预后的关系[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 52-57.

Chuanxi Zheng, Shiquan Zhang, Peng Wan, Jianrong Zheng, Hong Guan. Expression and significance of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase and forkhead box P3 in osteosarcoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 52-57.

目的

检测骨肉瘤组织中吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶(IDO)及叉状头转录因子3(FOXP3)的表达水平,并分析IDO与FOXP3的表达与患者预后的关系。

方法

2005年5月至2014年9月,选取在深圳市第二人民医院确诊且有完整临床资料的骨肉瘤患者标本39例,骨巨细胞瘤患者标本20例,骨软骨瘤患者20例。骨肉瘤患者标本来自于患者术后大体标本。骨巨细胞瘤标本均取自四肢骨巨细胞瘤患者;骨软骨瘤标本均取自单发四肢骨软骨瘤患者,多发骨软骨瘤和骨软骨瘤病标本不纳入本实验。应用免疫组织化学法测定IDO及FOXP3在39例骨肉瘤和20例骨巨细胞瘤,20例骨软骨瘤中的表达情况。应用SPSS 19.0软件进行统计学分析。卡方检验分析各样本组间的差异,生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验;Cox比例风险模型进行单因素,多因素生存分析。

结果

IDO,FOXP3在骨肉瘤组中阳性率分别为69.2%(27/39),53.8%(21/39),在骨巨细胞瘤组中阳性率分别为15%(3/20),0%,骨软骨瘤组中无阳性表达,各组间IDO,FOXP3表达差异具有统计学意义(IDO: χ2=6.201,P<0.05;FOXP3:χ2=5.834,P<0.05)。IDO高表达(评分≥5分)在Enneking分期,肺部转移亚组间有差异(χ2=6.594,P<0.05;χ2=8.770,P<0.05)而FOXP3在各亚组表达差异无统计学意义。通过Kaplan-Meier生存分析发现IDO,FOXP3高表达患者各时点总体生存时间均短于低表达者,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=8.905,P<0.05;χ2=4.573,P<0.05)。单因素分析表明,肺转移及IDO,FOXP3表达水平是影响骨肉瘤患者预后的因素而多因素分析显示,肺转移(HR=6.053,95% CI:13~34,P=0.040)是影响骨肉瘤预后的相关独立因素。

结论

IDO,FOXP3在骨良恶性肿瘤中的表达具有显著差异;IDO、FOXP3的高表达可作为评判骨肉瘤不良预后的指标。

Objective

To investigate the expression of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) and forkhead box P3(FOXP3) in the osteosarcoma, and evaluate the correlation between the expressions of IDO and FOXP3 protein and prognosis.

Methods

Cancer tissue samples were obtained from the patients (39 cases of osteosarcoma, 20 cases of giant cell tumor, 20 cases of osteochondroma) who were pathological diagnosed between May 2005 and September 2014 at the Second People Hospital of Shenzhen in China. Cancer tissue samples of osteosarcoma were obtained from postoperative tissue, giant cell tumor(GCT) tissue was obtained from the patients extremities with GCT, osteochondroma tissue was obtained from the patients extremities with osteochondroma; multiple lesions and hereditary multiple exostoses were excluded. The expressions of IDO and FOXP3 in osteosarcoma, osteochondroma and giant cell tumor tissues were studied by immunohistochemical staining. The statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS 19.0 software. Chi-square was used to analyze association between clinical parameters with IDO, FOXP3 expression subgroups. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test were used for survival analysis. Cox analysis was performed to estimate univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

IDO was expressed in 69.2% (27/39) and FOXP3 was expressed in 53.8% (21/39) of osteosarcoma. IDO was expressed in 15.0% (3/20) of giant cell tumor, but positive expression of FOXP3 was not found in giant cell tumor. Neither of them were found in osteochondroma, there were significant differences among the three groups in IDO and FOXP3 expressions(IDO: χ2=6.201, P<0.05; FOXP3: χ2=5.834, P<0.05). High expression of IDO (score≥5) was correlated with aggressive clinicopathologic features, such as lung metastasis, high surgical stage (Enneking stage)(χ2=6.594, P<0.05; χ2=8.770, P<0.05). Kaplan Meier-survival analysis showed that high expressions of IDO and FOXP3 were significantly associated with poor overall survival rates(χ2=8.905, P<0.05; χ2=4.573, P<0.05). Single factor variance analysis of overall survival rate showed that lung metastasis and high expression of IDO and FOXP3 were predicative factors of poor prognosis. However, only the lung metastasis was found to be an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (HR=6.053, 95% CI: 13-34, P=0.040). There was no significant correlation between high the expression of IDO, FOXP3 and overall survival in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

The expression of IDO, FOXP3 shows significant difference between benign and malignant tumors; thus high expression of IDO and FOXP3 is likely to be an effective predicative factor of poor prognosis for patients with osteosarcoma.

图1 骨肉瘤细胞IDO(吲哚胺2,3双加氧酶)免疫组化染色。图A 为强阳性表达,×200;图B 为阳性表达,×200
图2 骨巨细胞瘤和骨软骨瘤IDO(吲哚胺2,3双加氧酶)免疫组化染色。图A  为骨巨细胞瘤IDO阳性表达,×200;图B 为骨软骨瘤阴性表达,×100
图3 骨肉瘤细胞FOXP3(叉状头转录因子3)免疫组化染色。图A 强阳性表达,×200;图B 阳性表达,×200
图4 骨巨细胞瘤和骨软骨瘤FOXP3(叉状头转录因子3)免疫组化染色。图A 骨巨细胞瘤中FOXP3阴性表达,×100;图B 骨软骨瘤中FOXP3阴性表达,×100
表1 骨肉瘤组织中IDO及FOXP3表达与临床病理参数之间的关系(例)
临床参数分组 例数 IDO (高表达/低表达) F P 临床参数分组 FOXP3(高表达/低表达) F P
性别 24 76.5%(13)/50.0%(11) 2.839 0.092 性别 66.7%(12)/57.1%(12) 0.371 0.542
? 15 23.5%(4)/50.0%(11) ? ? ? 33.3%(6)/42.9%(9) ? ?
年龄(岁) <20 12 47.0%(8)/18.2%(4) 3.754 0.053 年龄(岁) <20 22.2%(4)/38.1%(8) 1.146 0.284
? ≥20 27 52.9%(9)/81.8%(18) ? ? ? ≥20 77.8%(14)/61.9%(13) ? ?
肿瘤部位 中轴骨 2 11.8%(2)/0(0) 2.728 0.251 肿瘤部位 中轴骨 5.6%(1)/4.8%(1) 0.013 0.909
? 四肢 37 88.2%(15)/100%(22) ? ? ? 四肢 94.4%(17)/95.2%(20) ? ?
外科分期b ⅡA 14 47.0%(8)/27.3%(6) 6.594 0.037a 外科分期b ⅡA 44.4%(8)/28.6%(6) 2.211 0.331
? ⅡB 18 23.5%(4)/63.6%(14) ? ? ? ⅡB 33.3%(6)/57.1%?(12) ? ?
? ⅢA-B 7 29.4%(5)/9.1%(2) ? ? ? ⅢA-B 22.2%(4)/14.3%(3) ? ?
病理性骨折 3 5.9%(1)/9.1%(2) 0.139 0.709 病理性骨折 5.6%(1)/9.5%(2) 0.215 0.643
? 36 94.1%(16)/90.9%(20) ? ? ? 94.4%(17)/90.5%(19) ? ?
碱性磷酸酶 升高 9 35.3%(6)/13.6%(3) 2.534 0.111 碱性磷酸酶 升高 33.3%(6)/14.3%(3) 1.981 0.159
? 正常 30 64.7%(11)/86.4%(19) ? ? ? 正常 66.7%(12)/85.7%(18) ? ?
肺部转移 15 64.7%(11)/18.2%(4) 8.77 0.003a 肺部转移 50.0%(9)/28.6%(6) 1.88 0.17
? 24 35.3%(6)/81.8%(18) ? ? ? 50.0%(9)/71.4%(15) ? ?
组织类型 骨母细胞性 35 88.2%(15)/90.9%(20) 4.141 0.126 组织类型 骨母细胞性 94.4%(17)/85.7%(18) 1.809 0.405
? 软骨母细胞性 2 11.8%(2)/0(0) ? ? ? 软骨母细胞性 5.56%(1)/4.8%(1) ? ?
? 纤维母细胞性 2 0(0)/9.1%(2) ? ? ? 纤维母细胞性 0(0)/9.5%(2) ? ?
复发 6 23.5%(4)/9.1%(2) 1.536 0.215 复发 11.1%(2)/19.0%(4) 0.469 0.493
? 33 76.5%(13)/90.9%(20) ? ? ? 88.9%(16)/80.1%(17) ? ?
图5 骨肉瘤患者Kaplan-Meier总体生存函数曲线 图A IDO(吲哚胺2,3双加氧酶)高表达组,IDO低表达组生存函数;图B FOXP3(叉状头转录因子3)高表达组,FOXP3低表达组生存函数
表2 骨肉瘤总体生存率的单因素、多因素COX回归分析
[1]
Dunn GP,Old LJ,Schreiber RD. The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting[J]. Immunity, 2004, 21(2): 137-148.
[2]
Munn DH,Mellor AL. IDO in the tumor microenvironment: inflammation, Counter-Regulation, and tolerance[J]. Trends Immunol, 2016, 37(3): 193-207.
[3]
Yong WM,Hajjar J,Hwu P, et al. Targeting the indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase pathway in cancer[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2015, 3(1):51
[4]
Mezrich JD,Fechner JH,Zhang X, et al. An interaction between kynurenine and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor can generate regulatory T cells[J]. J Immunol, 2010, 185(6): 3190-3198.
[5]
Munn DH,Sharma MD,Baban B, et al. GCN2 kinase in T cells mediates proliferative arrest and anergy induction in response to indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase[J]. Immunity, 2005, 22(5):633-642.
[6]
Fallarino F,Grohmann U,Vacca C, et al. T cell apoptosis by tryptophan catabolism.[J]. Cell Death Differ, 2002, 9(10):1069-1077.
[7]
Samstein RM,Arvey A,Josefowicz SZ, et al. Foxp3 exploits a pre-existent enhancer landscape for regulatory T cell lineage specification[J]. Cell, 2012, 151(1): 153-166.
[8]
Donatelli SS,Zhou JM,Gilvary DL, et al. TGF-β-inducible microRNA-183 silences tumor-associated natural killer cells[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014, 111(11): 4203-4208.
[9]
Whiteside TL. Immune modulation of T-cell and NK (natural killer) cell activities by TEXs (tumour-derived exosomes)[J]. Biochem Soc Trans, 2013, 41(1): 245-251.
[10]
Oleinika K,Nibbs RJ,Graham GJ, et al. Suppression, subversion and escape: the role of regulatory T cells in cancer progression[J]. Clin Exp Immunol, 2013, 171(1): 36-45.
[11]
Moffett JR,Namboodiri MA. Tryptophan and the immune response[J]. Immunol Cell Biol, 2003, 81(4): 247-265.
[12]
Nakamura T,Shima T,Saeki A, et al. Expression of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase and the recruitment of Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells in the development and progression of uterine cervical cancer[J]. Cancer Sci, 2007, 98(6): 874-881.
[13]
Ryu HS,Park YS,Park HJ, et al. Expression of indoleamine 2, 3-Dioxygenase and infiltration of FOXP3+regulatory T cells are associated with aggressive features of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma[J]. Thyroid, 2014, 24(8): 1232-1240.
[14]
高剑,焦兴元,张鹏, 等. 吲哚胺2, 3双加氧酶和叉状头转录因子3对胆囊癌免疫耐受的作用及影响[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2012, 18(4):252-255.
[15]
Metz R,Rust S,Duhadaway JB, et al. IDO inhibits a tryptophan sufficiency signal that stimulates mTOR: A novel IDO effector pathway targeted by D-1-methyl-tryptophan[J]. Oncoimmunology, 2012, 1(9):1460-1468.
[16]
Jacobs JF,Punt CJ,Lesterhuis WJ, et al. Dendritic cell vaccination in combination with anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody treatment: a phase I/II study in metastatic melanoma patients[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2010, 16(20): 5067-5078.
[1] 赵阳, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 党晓智, 蔡林利, 薛文欣, 李洋, 肖瑶, 郭妤绮, 宋宏萍. 自动乳腺超声联合免疫组化早期预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理完全缓解的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 361-369.
[2] 武壮壮, 张晓娟, 史泽洪, 史瑶, 原韶玲. 超声联合乳腺X线摄影及PR、Her-2预测高级别与中低级别乳腺导管原位癌的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 631-635.
[3] 贺媛媛, 李佳, 杨红. 宫颈中肾腺癌1例并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 97-104.
[4] 刘星辰, 刘娟, 魏宝宝, 刘洁, 刘辉. XIAP与XAF1异常表达与卵巢癌的相关性分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 419-427.
[5] 韩春颖, 王婷婷, 李艳艳, 朴金霞. 子宫内膜癌患者淋巴管间隙浸润预测因素研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 403-409.
[6] 陈怡芳, 黄晓卉. 肝细胞癌中对氧磷酶2的表达及临床意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 186-191.
[7] 刘政宏, 王凤力, 吉亚君, 高佳. 胃癌中ELK3蛋白的表达与临床病理特征和预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 155-159.
[8] 郭伟林, 李运涛, 尚培中, 李晓武, 李伟. 胰腺癌S100A4和Midkine表达研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 149-152.
[9] 蒋鹏飞, 程尼涛. 侵犯左肺及心包的巨大胸壁软骨肉瘤一例[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 296-298.
[10] 乔树叶, 以敏, 李理, 潘思琼, 陈苗玉. 骨肉瘤诱导多能干细胞模型的研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 30-36.
[11] 李峻峰, 李军, 孙勤丰, 孙建光, 孔祥兴. 九例结肠髓样癌的临床病理特征分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 248-252.
[12] 邱明宪, 康肖, 王磊. LncRNA NEAT1靶向miR-185-5p调控骨肉瘤的机制研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 233-239.
[13] 岳瑞雪, 孔令欣, 郝鑫, 杨进强, 韩猛, 崔国忠, 王建军, 张志生, 孔凡庭, 张维, 何文博, 李现桥, 周新平, 徐东宏, 胡崇珠. 乳腺癌HER2蛋白表达水平预测新辅助治疗疗效的真实世界研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 765-770.
[14] 毛高才, 张建波, 袁一方, 毛小波, 戴慧勇, 王哲. 耳后淋巴结内涎腺透明细胞型嗜酸性腺瘤的诊断学特征[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 261-265.
[15] 刘迎, 尹嫚, 杨林青, 王云飞. 子宫颈浸润性复层产黏液的癌的诊断学特征并文献复习[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 173-177.
阅读次数
全文


摘要