切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 1 -6. doi: 10.3877/ cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2025.01.001

临床论著

“Chinese way”单排修复巨大肩袖损伤临床疗效研究
刘彬1, 汪奕1, 叶明1, 康永松1, 陈建明1,()   
  1. 1. 425002 永州市中心医院关节骨病运动医学科
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-11 出版日期:2025-02-01
  • 通信作者: 陈建明
  • 基金资助:
    永州市科学技术局(2023012002)

Clinical efficacy of “Chinese way” single-row repair for massive rotator cuff injury

Bin Liu1, Yi Wang1, Ming Ye1, Yongsong Kang1, Jianming Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Orthopedic department of Yongzhou Central Hospital, Yongzhou 425002, China
  • Received:2024-07-11 Published:2025-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianming Chen
引用本文:

刘彬, 汪奕, 叶明, 康永松, 陈建明. “Chinese way”单排修复巨大肩袖损伤临床疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-6.

Bin Liu, Yi Wang, Ming Ye, Yongsong Kang, Jianming Chen. Clinical efficacy of “Chinese way” single-row repair for massive rotator cuff injury[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 1-6.

目的

探讨关节镜下“Chinese way”单排修复技术在巨大肩袖损伤治疗中的临床疗效。

方法

对2021年2月至2023年6月永州市中心医院收治的40例采用“Chinese way”单排修复技术治疗巨大肩袖损伤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。纳入标准:患者符合巨大肩袖损伤,肱二头肌长头腱(LHBT)无明显断裂且术前完善肩关节MRI。排除标准:合并关节盂骨折;重度骨关节炎;精神类疾病及不能耐受手术等。术中在不切断LHBT的情况下,通过单排带线锚钉对LHBT进行固定,再利用锚钉缝线进行桥接修补剩余肩袖损伤部位。对患者术前及术后6个月随访时肩关节前屈上举、体侧外旋活动度、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国肩肘外科协会评分(ASES)和美国加州大学洛杉矶肩关节评分系统(UCLA)功能评分采用配对t检验进行统计分析,并记录患者术前一般情况、术后并发症以及影像学资料。

结果

共40患者,男17例,女23例,年龄40~81岁,平均年龄(64±9)岁。所有患者手术均顺利完成。术后发现均无锚钉松动、大力水手征以及切口感染等并发症。对所有患者进行随访,随访时间为8~14个月,平均(10.5±1.8)个月。术后6个月随访时,患者肩关节前屈上举(t=30.32)和体侧外旋活动度(t=11.72)均优于术前(均为P<0.05),VAS评分明显低于术前(t=33.26,P<0.05),而ASES(t=33.48)、UCLA评分(t=48.76)明显高于术前(均为P<0.05)。术后X片检查提示肩关节退变未见明显进展,术后末次随访时肩关节MRI提示7例肩袖再次撕裂,再撕裂率17.5%(7/40)。

结论

关节镜下“Chinese way”单排修复技术在治疗巨大肩袖损伤方面具有显著疗效。该技术不仅能够缓解患者疼痛症状,而且可以改善患者肩关节功能活动,技术操作简单。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of “Chinese way” single row repair technique under arthroscopy in the treatment of massive rotator cuff injury.

Methods

The clinical data of 40 patients with massive rotator cuff injury treated by Chinese way single-row repair in Yongzhou Central Hospital from February 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.Inclusion criteria: the patients were consistent with a massive rotator cuff injury, no significant rupture of the biceps long head tendon (LHBT), and underwent preoperative MRI examination of shoulder joint.Exclusion criteria: combined with glenoid fracture; severe osteoarthritis; mental illness and being unable to tolerate surgery.During the operation, the LHBT was fixed by a single row of string anchors, and the remaining rotator cuff injury was repaired by bridging the anchor stitches.Paired t-tests were conducted for statistical analysis on the shoulder joint flexion and abduction, external rotation at the side of the body, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder function score of the patients at preoperative and 6-month postoperative follow-up.Preoperative general conditions, postoperative complications and imaging data of patients were recorded.

Results

A total of 40 patients were included, including 17 males and 23 females, ranging in age from 40 to 81 years, with an average age of (64±9) years.All the patients were successfully operated.There were no complications such as anchor loosening, incision infection and Popeye sign.All the patients were followed up for eight to 14 months, with an average of (10.5±1.8) months.At six months follow-up, the movements of shoulder joint flexion (t=30.32) and lateral lateral rotation (t=11.72)were better than those before surgery (P<0.05).At six months follow-up, VAS score was significantly lower than before surgery (t=33.26, P<0.05), while ASES (t=33.48) and UCLA scores (t=48.76) were significantly higher than before surgery (P<0.05).Postoperative X-ray examination indicated that there was no significant progress in shoulder joint degeneration.At the last postoperative follow-up, shoulder joint MRI indicated that seven cases had rotator cuff retear, with an incidence of 17.5% (7/40).

Conclusions

“Chinese way” singlerow repair technique under arthroscopy has a significant effect on the treatment of massive rotator cuff injury.The technique can reduce the pain symptoms and improve the functional activities of the shoulder joint.The operation is simple and the clinical effect is satisfactory.

图1 关节镜下“Chinese way”单排修复巨大肩袖损伤术中图像。图A 为证实巨大肩袖撕裂;图B 为评估肱二头肌长头腱(LHBT)质量并进行固定
Figure 1 Intraoperative image of “Chinese way” single row repair of massive rotator cuff injury under arthroscope.A is showing a confirmed massive rotator cuff tear; B shows that the mass of the long head biceps tendon (LHBT) was assessed and fixed.
表1 术前、末次随访肩关节活动指标及肩关节评分指标[n=40,(±s)]
Table 1 Preoperative and final follow-up of shoulder joint activity index and shoulder joint score index
图2 右侧巨大肩袖损伤患者术前及术后6 个月情况。图A ~C 为巨大肩袖损伤患者术前功能活动,示右肩功能活动受限;图D ~F 为巨大肩袖损伤患者术前右肩MRI,示肩袖肌腱撕裂、肩袖回缩;图G ~I 为术后6 个月随访,示右肩功能活动较术前改善;图J ~L 为术后6 个月右肩MRI,示右肩肩袖肌腱修补后连续性恢复,足印区域软组织覆盖良好
Figure 2 Images of the patient with right massive rotator cuff injury before and six months after surgery.A to C are images of preoperative functional activities, showing right shoulder with limited range of motion; D to F are MRI images of the right shoulder before surgery, showing rotator cuff tendon tear and rotator cuff retraction; G to I are images of functional activities six months after surgery,showing the improved range of motion of the right shoulder ; J to L are MRI images of the right shoulder six months after surgery, showing that the continity of the rotator cuff tendon recovered after repair and the soft tissue coverage in the footprint area was good.
[1]
徐晖, 姜熙平, 胡庆翔, 等.巨大肩袖损伤的临床治疗新进展[J].外科研究与新技术( 中英文 ), 2024,13( 1 ): 1-6, 99.
[2]
Park I, Lee HJ, Choi YH, et al.Arthroscopic repair of large to massive rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 60 years[J].J Orthop Sci, 2020, 25( 1 ): 104-109.
[3]
Boutsiadis A, Chen S, Jiang C, et al.Long head of the biceps as a suitable available local tissue autograft for superior capsular reconstruction:“ the Chinese way”[J/OL].Arthrosc Tech, 2017, 6( 5 ): e1559-e1566.DOI:10.1016/j.eats.2017.06.030.
[4]
赵赞栋, 张亮, 郑江.巨大肩袖损伤的治疗进展——探索及挑战[J].骨科, 2021, 12( 2 ): 189-192.
[5]
Mundakkal A, Panakkal JJ, Nair AV, et al.Arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair with biceps augmentation[J/OL].Arthrosc Tech,2024, 13( 2 ): 102858.DOI:10.1016/j.eats.2023.09.033.
[6]
Wang E, Wang L, Gao P, et al.Single-versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in massive tears[J].Med Sci Monit,2015, 21: 1556-1561.
[7]
Early NA, Elias JJ, Lippitt SB, et al.Suture spanning augmentation of single-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical analysis[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2017, 26( 2 ): 337-342.
[8]
Ying ZM, Lin T, Yan SG.Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row technique for repairing rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Orthop Surg, 2014, 6( 4 ): 300-312.
[9]
Gu Z, Wu S, Yang Y, et al.Comparison of arthroscopic singlerow and double-row repair for rotator cuff injuries with different tear sizes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL].Orthop J Sports Med, 2023, 11( 8 ): 23259671231180854.DOI:10.1177/23259671231180854.
[10]
Guity MR, Mirghaderi P, Mortazavi SMJ, et al.Early versus late physiotherapy following arthroscopic repair of small and medium size rotator cuff tear: a randomized clinical tria[lJ].Int Orthop,2023, 47( 11 ): 2795-2807.
[11]
van Deurzen D, Scholtes V, Willems WJ, et al.Long-term results of arthroscopic and mini-open repair of small-to medium-size full-thickness rotator cuff tears[J].Shoulder Elbow, 2019, 11( 1 Suppl ): 68-76.
[12]
Chung SW, Oh JH, Gong HS, et al.Factors affecting rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic repair: osteoporosis as one of the independent risk factors[J].Am J Sports Med, 2011, 39( 10 ):2099-2107.
[13]
Zheng X, Tang K.Research progress of treatment for massive rotator cuff tears[J].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2021,35( 1 ): 8-13.
[14]
Liu T, Zhang MT, Zhou JP, et al.Progress on arthroscopic surgery for massive rotator cuff tears[J].Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2022, 35( 12 ):1177-1182.
[15]
Di Benedetto P, Mancuso F, Tosolini L, et al.Treatment options for massive rotator cuff tears: a narrative review[J/OL].Acta Biomed,2021, 92( S3 ): e2021026.DOI:10.23750/abm.v92iS3.11766.
[16]
周新, 张孝华, 周述清, 等.不同手术方式治疗不可修复型肩袖损伤效果的Meta分析[J/OL].中华关节外科杂志( 电子版 ),2023, 17( 2 ): 232-242.
[17]
Sheth MM, Shah AA.Massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears: a review of current definitions and concepts[J/OL].Orthop J Sports Med, 2023, 11( 5 ): 23259671231154452.DOI:10.1177/23259671231154452.
[18]
Arroyo W, Getelman MH, Snyder SJ.Single row rotator cuff repair with triple loaded suture anchors: the SCOI row technique[J].Arthroscopy, 2021, 37( 8 ): 2397-2398.
[19]
He HB, Hu Y, Li C, et al.Biomechanical comparison between single-row with triple-loaded suture anchor and suture-bridge double-row rotator cuff repai[rJ/OL].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2020, 21( 1 ): 629.DOI:10.1186/s12891-020-03654-y.
[20]
Morsy MG, Gawish HM.Double attack repair for massive rotator cuff tears: superior capsular reconstruction using the long head of biceps tendon plus margin convergence repai[rJ/OL].Arthrosc Tech,2023, 12( 12 ): e2187-e2195.DOI:10.1016/j.eats.2023.07.044.
[21]
Chiang CH, Shaw L, Chih WH, et al.Modified superior capsule reconstruction using the long head of the biceps tendon as reinforcement to rotator cuff repair lowers retear rate in large to massive reparable rotator cuff tears[ J].Arthroscopy, 2021, 37( 8 ):2420-2431.
[22]
Chen RE, Bakhsh WR, Lipof JS, et al.Rotator cuff anterior cable reconstruction with long head of biceps tendon autograf[tJ/OL].Arthrosc Tech, 2020, 9( 6 ): e711-e715.DOI:10.1016/j.eats.2020.02.001.
[1] 张忠涛, 高加勒, 姚宏伟. 新辅助放化疗联合免疫治疗局部进展期直肠癌的现状与前景[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 119-122.
[2] 姚宏伟, 孙丽婷, 吴偲, 舒文龙, 高加勒, 杨正阳, 吴国聪, 张忠涛. 新辅助放化疗联合免疫治疗局部进展期直肠癌的探索与实践[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 123-127.
[3] 王乾宇, 杜峻峰, 李世拥. 新辅助放化疗联合免疫治疗局部进展期直肠癌的突破与挑战[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 128-131.
[4] 吴楚营, 叶凯. 不同部位胃肠道间质瘤的腹腔镜手术策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 224-227.
[5] 杨培容, 潘刚, 周春霞. 胰腺癌术后胰瘘的危险因素及治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 228-230.
[6] 邱皓炜, 徐臻, 肖泽秀, 夏燕, 查高峰, 庞俊. 前列腺癌mRNA 疫苗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 134-139.
[7] 刘咏博, 郭佳. 外泌体在前列腺癌细胞免疫逃逸中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 140-145.
[8] 董振阳, 瞿旻, 王燕, 张韻, 高旭. 序贯多学科会诊模式在前列腺癌全程管理中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 152-158.
[9] 万颂, 刘璇, 黄源兴, 江文聪, 周宇林, 习明. 胆固醇生物合成相关基因对前列腺癌预后和治疗的意义[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 205-215.
[10] 何海填, 罗锦斌, 汪洋, 张斌, 王可兵. 腹膜后单中心型Castleman病一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 251-254.
[11] 张翀, 张宗明, 刘卓, 刘立民, 赵月, 齐晖. 肝门部胆管癌诊治进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 167-180.
[12] 李起, 袁嘉玮, 张东, 耿智敏. 胆囊息肉样病变的外科诊疗争议与策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 181-186.
[13] 丁志文, 赵一鸣, 王鲁. 肝内胆管癌手术与综合治疗[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 187-196.
[14] 宋然, 郑雅各. 仑伐替尼联合肝动脉插管化疗栓塞术治疗不可切除晚期肝癌的疗效及生存率影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 120-124.
[15] 周振宇, 杨利君, 薛伟, 彭亮. 推拿治疗肠易激综合征的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 185-190.
阅读次数
全文


摘要