Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05): 535-541. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.05.002

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of robotic assisted and traditional total hip arthroplasties with direct anterior approach

Yu Zhang1, Kai Fu1, Yao Yao1, Hao Liu1, Zaikai Zhuang2, Tao Jiang2, Ying Shen1, Qing Jiang1, Dongyang Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China; Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Nanjing 210008, China
    2. Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Nanjing 210008, China; Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2021-07-31 Online:2022-10-01 Published:2022-12-30
  • Contact: Dongyang Chen

Abstract:

Objective

To retrospectively explore the short-term clinical efficacy of RIO robotic arm interactive orthopedic system (MAKO robotic) assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) through direct anterior approach (DAA) compared with traditional model.

Methods

The data of a total of 48 patients (24 patients for MAKO group and 24 patients for the traditional group) who underwent THA through DAA were analyzed retrospectively during the period of February 2020 to January 2021. Inclusion criteria: the patients undergoing unilateral TKA for the first time; no operation in this hip joint; no abnormality was found in preoperative hepatic and renal function, hemoglobin, and coagulation function. Exclusion criteria: operation in this hip; infection; cardiopulmonary insufficiency, anemia. The patients were divided into MAKO robotic assissted group (the MAKO group) and the tranditional group according to the opermtive method, 24 cases in each.The data of sex, age, hip diseases and body mass index (BMI) were collected. The operation time, post-operative volume of drainage, decline in hemoglobin, the anteversion and abduction angles of acetabular cup, lower leg discrepancy, lenghth of hospital stay, Harris score, postoperative analgesia drug score and complications were assessed between the two groups. The data were analyzed by independent sample t test, repeated measures ANOVA and chi-square test.

Results

The follow-up time were (10.3±3.7) months in MAKO group and (10.9±2.7)months in the traditional group. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups in the lenghth of hospital stay, pain drugs, volume of drainage, lower leg discrepancy, peri-operative hematocrit and decline in hemoglobin, postoperative analgesia drug score and Harris score in the last follow-up(all P>0.05). Compared with the traditional group, the MAKO group showed longer operation time [(133.1±26.3)min vs(103.1±25.0)min](t=4.050, P<0.001). The anteversion [(19.6±2.5)° vs(25.3±5.2)°](t=4.840, P<0.001) and abduction angles of acetabular cup[(40.6±4.0)°vs(36.9±7.0)°](t=2.248, P=0.029)were more consistent with predetermined values in the MAKO group than that in the traditional group. Compared with pre-operation, the patients in MAKO group had shorter difference between two hips in off-set. (t=2.668, P=0.011)

Conclusions

Compared with traditional THA, the prosthesis composition could achieve more corrective predetermined angles with the MAKO assisted arm and similar off-set at the cost of longer operation time. The short-term hip functions are similar in both surgical methods, but the long-term results should be further studied.

Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, hip, Robotics surgical procedures

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-83189181,020-83062381 E-mail: cjojs1@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd