Comparison between directed anterior appoach assisted cannulated screw and intramedullary fixation for young adults with unstable femoral neck fractures

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.06.001

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To analyze the clinical efficacy of direct anterior approach(DAA)-assisted cannulated screw and Intertan intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures in young adults.

Methods

From January 2014 to December 2016, 179 cases of displaced unstable (Garden III or IV)femoral neck fractures in young adults were treated by open reduction of direct anterior approach (DAA). Inclusion creteria: surgery is completed within 24 hours, age<60 years old and follow-up data intact; exclusion creteria: ipsilateral intertrochanteric fractures, subtrochanteric fractures, femoral shaft fractures, long-term use of large doses of hormones or alcohol abuse patients.Ninety cases were treated by DAA-assisted cannulated screw fixation in group A and 89 cases were treated by DAA-assisted Intertan intramedullary fixation in group B. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 21.0 statistical software with t test and χ² test to compare the operation time, the number of fluoroscopy, the amount of bleeding, the hospitalization day, the fracture healing time, the fracture nonunion, the avascular necrosis rate of the femoral head, and the Harris score.

Results

There was no significant difference in age, gender, and Garden classification between the two groups (all P>0.05), which was comparable. Group A was superior to group B in terms of operation time[group A (35.4±15.6) min, group B(55.2±12.4) min], number of X-ray exminations [group A (6.5±3.4) times, group B(9.3±4.6) times], and bleeding volume[group A (70.5±24.5) ml, group B(129.7±40.2) ml](all P<0.01). Group A did not differ from group B in hospitalization day[(7.2±2.1)d vs. (8.2±1.3)d, t =-1.567, P>0.05]. The healing time of group B (2.8±0.8) months was shorter than that of group A (3.8±0.7) months(t=5.375, P<0.01). In group B, nonunion and avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred in four cases, which were significantly less than those in group A (15 cases)(χ² =6.005, P<0.05). In group B, three cases were poor in Harris score, which were less than group A (15 cases were poor)(χ² =7.338, P<0.01).

Conclusion

Young adults with unstable femoral neck fracture treated with DAA-assisted Intertan intramedullary fixation can achieve completely reduction of bone under direct vision, with fast postoperative recovery, high healing rate, and low incidence of femoral head necrosis; the effect is satisfactory.

Key words: Femoral neck fractures, Surgical procedure, Internal fixators

Peng Chen, Chenglong Zhuo, Fei Ji, Yizhou Chen, Rongqin Zhong. Comparison between directed anterior appoach assisted cannulated screw and intramedullary fixation for young adults with unstable femoral neck fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 746-752.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhgjwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.06.001

https://zhgjwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2018/V12/I06/746

Figures/Tables 7

References 20

[1]	Ly TV, Swiontkowski MF. Treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults[J]．Instr Course Lect，2009, 58(1)：69-81.
[2]	Pauyo T, Drager J, Albers A, et al. Management of femoral neck fractures in the young patient: a critical analysis review[J]. World J Orthop, 2014, 5(3): 204-217.
[3]	Florschutz AV, Langford JR, Haidukewych GJ, et al. Femoral neck fractures: current management[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015, 29(3): 121-129.
[4]	Naumov I, Wiegand N, Patczai B, et al. Differential scanning calo-rimetrie examination of the human hyaline cartilage of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture[J]. J Therm Anal Calorim, 2012, 108(1): 59-65.
[5]	Kang JS, Moon KH, Shin JS, et al. Clinical results of internal fixationof subcapital femoral neck fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2016, 8(2): 146-152.
[6]	Madhu TS, Akula M, Scott BW，et al.Management to developmental dislocation of hip: does chanping the hip abduction angle in the spica affect the rate of avascular necrosis of the femoral head [J]. J Pediatr Orthop B，2013，22(3)：184-188.
[7]	Ai ZS, Gao YS, Sun Y, et al. Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with avascular necrosis of the femoral head following femoral neck fractures in middle-aged and elderly patients[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2013, 18(2): 271-276.
[8]	Windolf M, Braunstein V, Dutoit C，et al. Is a helical shaped implant a superior alternative to the dynamic hip screw for unstable femoral neck fractures a biomechanical investigation[J]. Clin Biomech(Bristol，Avon)，2009，24(1): 59-64.
[9]	Papakostidis C, Panagiotopoulos A, Piccioli A, et al. Timing of internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the final outcome[J]. Injury, 2015, 46(3): 459-466.
[10]	Lein T, Bula P, Jeffries J, et al. Fractures of the femoral neck[J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2011, 78(1): 10-9.
[11]	智春升，邬波，金冶华，等．DAA入路空心钉固定治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的疗效观察[J]．中华骨与关节外科杂志，2017，10(2)：132-135.
[12]	Zhao DW, Hu YC. Chinese experts consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoneerosis of the femoral head in adults[J]. Orthop Surg, 2012, 4(3): 125-130.
[13]	Windolf M, Braunstein V, Dutoit C, et al. Is a helical shaped implanta superior alternative to the dynamic hip screw for unstable femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical investigation[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2009, 24(1): 59-64.
[14]	Kaynak G, Ünlü C, Güven MF, et al. Intramedullary nail with integrated cephalocervical screws in the intertrochanteric fractures treatment: position of screws in fracture stability[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2018, 24(3)：268-273.
[15]	Gavaskar AS, Tummala NC, Srinivasan P, et al. Helical blade or the integrated lag screws: a matched pair analysis of 100 patients with unstable trochanteric fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2018, 32(6)：274-277.
[16]	Zhang J, Cao L H, Chen X, et al. Comparison of PFNA and Intertan intramedullary nail in treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures[J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2017, 30(7)：597-601.
[17]	张晟，胡岩君，余斌．不同内固定方式固定Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折模型的有限元分析[J]．中国矫形外科杂志，2017，25 (2)：163-169.
[18]	周军杰，曹成福，庞金辉，等．不同内固定手术方法治疗不稳定型股骨颈骨折的对照分析[J]．中国矫形外科杂志，2013，21(2)：136-139.
[19]	Rupprecht, Martin MD, Grossterlinden, et al. A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw[J]. J Trauma，2011，10 (71)：625-634.
[20]	张长青，黄轶刚．股骨颈骨折的治疗理念与新技术[J]．中华创伤骨科杂志，2016，18(8)：645-646.

?	例数	年龄[岁，(±s)]	性别(男/女)	Garden分型(Ⅲ型/Ⅳ型)
空心钉组	90	30±13	62/28	55/35
Intertan髓内钉组	89	32±13	60/29	56/33
统计值	?	t＝0.258	χ²＝0.045	χ²＝0.062
P值	?	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

?	例数	年龄[岁，(±s)]	性别(男/女)	Garden分型(Ⅲ型/Ⅳ型)
空心钉组	90	30±13	62/28	55/35
Intertan髓内钉组	89	32±13	60/29	56/33
统计值	?	t＝0.258	χ²＝0.045	χ²＝0.062
P值	?	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

?	例数	手术时间[min，(±s)]	透视次数[次，(±s)]	出血量[ml，(±s)]	住院日[d，(±s)]	骨折愈合时间[个月，(±s)]	失败率[例(%)]	术后1年Harris评分优良率(%)
空心钉组	90	45.4±15.6	6.5±3.4	90.5±24.5	7.2±2.1	3.8±0.7	15(16.6)	83.3
Intertan髓内钉组	89	75.2±12.4	9.3±4.6	159.7±40.2	8.2±1.3	2.8±0.8	4(4.5)	96.6
统计值	?	t＝－5.325	t＝－7.024	t＝－8.223	t＝－1.567	t＝5.375	χ²＝6.005	χ²＝7.338
P值	?	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	>0.05	<0.01	<0.05	<0.01

?	例数	手术时间[min，(±s)]	透视次数[次，(±s)]	出血量[ml，(±s)]	住院日[d，(±s)]	骨折愈合时间[个月，(±s)]	失败率[例(%)]	术后1年Harris评分优良率(%)
空心钉组	90	45.4±15.6	6.5±3.4	90.5±24.5	7.2±2.1	3.8±0.7	15(16.6)	83.3
Intertan髓内钉组	89	75.2±12.4	9.3±4.6	159.7±40.2	8.2±1.3	2.8±0.8	4(4.5)	96.6
统计值	?	t＝－5.325	t＝－7.024	t＝－8.223	t＝－1.567	t＝5.375	χ²＝6.005	χ²＝7.338
P值	?	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	>0.05	<0.01	<0.05	<0.01

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export