Effect of proprioceptive training on knee function rehabilitation after meniscus injury

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.03.021

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the effect of proprioception training on knee function rehabilitation after arthroscopic meniscus repair.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with meniscus injuries who had undergone arthroscopic surgery from May to November in the 2021 of the Third People's Hospital of Huizhou were selected. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: control group (n=50) that accepted routine rehabilitation training, and observation group (n=50) that accepted routine rehabilitation training and proprioception training. Visual analogue scale(VAS), Western Ontario & McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index(WOMAC), Knee Society score(KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS)knee score and the World Health Organization quality of life scale(WHOQOL-100)were used to evaluate the efficacy of different training methods. Chi square test and t test were used to compare the therapeutic effects between the two groups.

Results

The effective rate(94.0%)of the observation group was higher than that (78.0%)of the control group(χ²=5.316, P<0.05). After four weeks of training, VAS, WOMAC, KSS, HSS and WHOQOL-100 scores in the observation group were better than those in the control group(t=4.436, 4.308, 6.676, 4.857, 7.269, all P<0.05).

Conclusion

On the basis of routine rehabilitation training, proprioception training is effective for patients with meniscus injury after arthroscopic repair, which can effectively improve knee joint function.

Key words: Tibial meniscus injuries, Proprioception, Rehabilitation

Hang Su. Effect of proprioceptive training on knee function rehabilitation after meniscus injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 435-438.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhgjwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.03.021

https://zhgjwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2023/V17/I03/435

Figures/Tables 3

References 13

[1]	Barati AA, Rajabi R, Shahrbanian S, et al. Investigation of the effect of sensorimotor exercises on proprioceptive perceptions among children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy[J]. J Hand Ther, 2020, 33(3): 411－417.
[2]	胡争波，李文虎，袁艾东，等. 富血小板血浆治疗慢性半月板损伤的前期疗效观察[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 33－38.
[3]	中华中医药学会．中医骨伤科常见病诊疗指南[M]. 北京：中国中医药出版社，2012.
[4]	陈安民，李锋. 骨科疾病诊疗指南[M]. 3版. 北京：科学出版社，2013.
[5]	宣华兵，罗新乐，唐久阳，等. 盘状半月板撕裂关节镜手术的回顾性分析[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(6): 773－776.
[6]	王新烨，王冰，郭杏芳，等. 本体感觉训练对膝关节周围骨折术后所致关节僵硬患者康复的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展，2018, 18(2): 330－333.
[7]	赵冬梅，李维婷，曾贞，等. 加速康复外科护理对关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术后患者膝关节功能的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志，2019, 25(2): 151－154.
[8]	彭文洁，罗肖，张东，等. 本体感觉训练治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的疗效及对患者步态特征和平衡能力的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志，2020, 19(1): 102－105.
[9]	梁辉，卢英，陈启波，等. 针刺联合康复训练对髌骨骨折内固定术后患者膝关节活动度及相关功能的影响[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报，2019, 39(7): 95－98.
[10]	McGrath R, Bodt B, Sergi F. Robot-aided training of propulsion during walking: effects of torque pulses applied to the hip and knee joints during stance[J]. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2020, 28(12): 2923－2932.
[11]	刘强，杨曼，熊小云，等. 本体感觉训练对膝关节骨性关节炎患者全膝关节置换术后本体感觉及膝关节功能的影响[J]. 新乡医学院学报，2021, 38(2): 180－183.
[12]	黄超，吴听，赵克佳，等. 系统化康复训练路径在前交叉韧带重建后膝关节本体感觉功能训练中的应用效果[J]. 护理实践与研究，2018, 15(21): 153－155.
[13]	李俊，贾勤，戴雅琴，等. 瑞士球本体感觉训练在全膝关节置换术后患者早期康复中的应用效果[J]. 中国护理管理，2021, 21(8) ：1201－1205.

组别Groups	例数Case number	优Excellent	良Good	可Tolerable	差Inferior	达到康复Effective Rehabilitation
观察组Obesrvation group	50	21(42.0)	16(32.0)	10(20.0)	3(6.0)	47(94.0)
对照组Control group	50	15(30.0)	12(24.0)	12(24.0)	11(22.0)	39(78.0)
χ²值						5.316
P值						0.021

组别Groups	例数Case number	优Excellent	良Good	可Tolerable	差Inferior	达到康复Effective Rehabilitation
观察组Obesrvation group	50	21(42.0)	16(32.0)	10(20.0)	3(6.0)	47(94.0)
对照组Control group	50	15(30.0)	12(24.0)	12(24.0)	11(22.0)	39(78.0)
χ²值						5.316
P值						0.021

组别Groups	例数Case number	HSS评分		KSS评分		WOMAC评分
组别Groups	例数Case number	训练前Before training	训练4周后Four weeks after training	训练前Before training	训练4周后Four weeks after training	训练前Before training	训练4周后Four weeks after training
观察组Obesrvation group	50	42.3±4.6	84.2±3.3^ab	45.3±2.2	86.3±5.1^ab	82.2±5.3	26.3±3.9^ab
对照组Control group	50	43.2±4.6	87.2±3.6^b	46.1±3.3	80.2±4.0^b	82.3±5.5	30.2±4.2^b
t值		0.968	4.308	1.419	6.676	0.130	4.857
P值		>0.05	0.008	>0.05	0.026	>0.05	0.009

组别Groups	例数Case number	HSS评分		KSS评分		WOMAC评分
组别Groups	例数Case number	训练前Before training	训练4周后Four weeks after training	训练前Before training	训练4周后Four weeks after training	训练前Before training	训练4周后Four weeks after training
观察组Obesrvation group	50	42.3±4.6	84.2±3.3^ab	45.3±2.2	86.3±5.1^ab	82.2±5.3	26.3±3.9^ab
对照组Control group	50	43.2±4.6	87.2±3.6^b	46.1±3.3	80.2±4.0^b	82.3±5.5	30.2±4.2^b
t值		0.968	4.308	1.419	6.676	0.130	4.857
P值		>0.05	0.008	>0.05	0.026	>0.05	0.009

组别Groups	例数Case number	VAS评分		WHOQOL-100评分
组别Groups	例数Case number	训练前Before training	训练4周后After 4 weeks of training	训练前Before training	训练4周后After 4 weeks of training
观察组Obesrvation group	50	7.5±0.7	2.7±0.6^ab	66.3±2.7	88.6±5.3^ab
对照组Control group	50	7.4±0.7	3.3±0.7^b	66.3±2.8	81.3±4.9^b
t值		0.797	4.436	0.018	7.269
P值		>0.05	0.008	>0.05	<0.001

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export