Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06): 673-679. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.06.004

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Outcomes comparison in cocktail injection different methods in total knee arthroplasty

Shida Kuang1, Xin Zhao1, Chao Su1, Weijie Liu1, Shuguang Gao2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
    2. Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410008, China; National Clinical Research Center of Geriatric Disorders, Changsha 410008, China
  • Received:2020-10-20 Online:2021-12-01 Published:2022-02-07
  • Contact: Shuguang Gao

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the effects of intra-articular cocktail injection and periarticular injection on pain and knee movement after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

From April 2019 to January 2020 in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, the patients who needed unilateral TKA due to osteoarthritis were evaluated as study cohort. Inclusion criteria: patients undergoing unilateral TKA for the first time; no abnormality was found in preoperative platelet, coagulation function and venous ultrasound of both lower limbs; good compliance. Exclusion criteria: patients with neuropathic pain and sensory disorders; stop taking anticoagulant or aspirin for less than one week; definite allergy or contraindication to triamcinolone, ropivacaine or tranexamic acid; severe hepatic and renal insufficiency; high risk of thrombosis; bilateral TKA was performed during hospitalization. Ninety patients were enrolled and divided into the intra-articular group (n=47) and the peri-articular group (n=43). During the operation, cocktail injections were given into the articular cavity in the intra-articular group and around the joints in the peri-articular group. The general information of the patients was recorded; the degree of pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain and the recovery of motor function was evaluated by joint range of motion (ROM), the time of active straight leg raising (SLR) and the time of 90° knee flexion. The results were analyzed by independent sample t test, repeated measures anova and chi-square test.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in rest VAS(F=0.120, P>0.05) and activity VAS(F=0.321, P>0.05) between the two groups before and after operation, and there was no statistically significant difference in ROM(F=0.688, P>0.05) between the two groups before operation and after operation. There was no statistically significant difference between postoperative SLR(t=0.755, P>0.05) and postoperative 90° knee flexion time(t=-1.234, P>0.05) in both groups.

Conclusion

There is no statistically significant difference in early postoperative analgesia and motor rehabilitation outcomes between the cocktail of intra-articular injection and peri-articular injection after total knee arthroplasty within two weeks.

Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, knee, Injections, intra-articular, Osteoarthritis

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-83189181,020-83062381 E-mail: cjojs1@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd