Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03): 261-265. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.03.001

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research •     Next Articles

Effect of anchor fixation position and angle on repair of anterior capsule of shoulder

Yongliang Ou1, Huayang Huang1,(), Pingyue Li1, Tao Zhang1, Hongyuan Shen1, Lingchuang Kong1, Hong Xia1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Traumatic Orthopaedics of PLA, Guangdong Key Lab of Orthopedic Technology and Implant, Key Laboratory of Trauma & Tissue Repair of Tropical Area of PLA, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA, Guangzhou 510010, China
  • Received:2020-02-28 Online:2020-06-01 Published:2020-06-01
  • Contact: Huayang Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Huayang, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate different suture anchor placement and insertion angle affect efficacy of patients with anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on 85 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for Bankart lesions in General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA from January to December 2018. Severe bone defects, revision and other injuries were excluded. Postoperative CT was used to measure suture anchors’ placement and angle. Visual analog scale(VAS) and Rowe scores were used to comprehensively evaluate joint pain, stability, range of motion(ROM) and function at the last follow-up(range, 12-24 months). Independent sample t test was used to analyze the relationship between different anchor positions and angles and VAS and Rowe scores.

Results

The group with the anchor placed on the glenoid face contained 57 patients, and the group with anchor partially placed at the glenoid edge contained 28 patients. VAS calculated at follow-up showed no significantly difference between two groups (t=-0.829, P>0.05), but the group with the anchor placed on the glenoid face were better in Rowe scores (t=-4.072, P<0.05). In the reverse comparison of anchor insertion angle by postoperative Rowe scores, there was no statistically significant difference between the four corresponding anchor insertion angles at two-, three-, four- and five-o’clock positions respectively(t=0.312, 0.885, 0.775, 0.934 respectively, all P>0.05).

Conclusion

Suture anchor positioned on the glenoid face with reasonable insertion angle can achieve better short-term efficacy after arthroscopic Bankart repair, and the long-term efficacy needs to be further studied.

Key words: Arthroscopy, Shoulder, Dislocation

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-83189181,020-83062381 E-mail: cjojs1@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd