Study on correlation between changes of imaging parameters and pain degree of knee osteoarthritis

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.01.021

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the correlation between the changes of imaging parameters and the degree of pain in knee osteoarthritis(KOA).

Methods

Ninety patients with KOA were selected from September 2014 to September 2016 in Panyu District Hospital of traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangzhou. All the selected patients took knee joint axial X-ray films. Five imaging indicators were collected on picture archiving and communication systems(PACS) imaging system, namely patellofemoral index, patellofemoral coordination angle (suitable angle), lateral patellofemoral angle, patellofemoral tilt angle and femoral trochlear groove angle. The degree of pain in KOA patients was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. According to the VAS score, the patients were divided into two groups: VAS score ≥ 5 and VAS score <5. The imaging indicators of the two groups were compared. The correlation between VAS scores and imaging parameters were analyzed by logistic multiple regression analysis. Among them, 1-3 was classified as mild pain, 4-6 as moderate pain and 7-10 as severe pain.

Results

The patellofemoral index was significantly different between the two groups(t=2.05, P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in other indicators. Regression analysis showed that patellofemoral index and moderate pain had statistical significance (odds ratio=1.345, P<0.05).

Conclusions

There is a correlation between the change of lower limb force line and the degree of pain in KOA patients. Patellofemoral index is associated with moderate pain.

Key words: Pain, Knee osteoarthritis

Yantao Wang, Yaqin Yang, Huaqing Jiang, Jinzhao Chen, Dejian Liu, Shuyi Xian, taibin Qiu, Weikuan Li, chi Zhou. Study on correlation between changes of imaging parameters and pain degree of knee osteoarthritis[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 115-118.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhgjwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.01.021

https://zhgjwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2020/V14/I01/115

Figures/Tables 3

References 15

[1]	于海波，周建. X线、MRI在膝关节退行性骨关节病中的诊断价值[J]．中国社区医师(医学专业半月刊)，2009，11(20)：197.
[2]	李志敏．超声检查在膝骨关节炎的应用探讨[J]．实用骨科杂志，2015，(3)：270-272.
[3]	王琰琦．关节镜检查与MRI在膝关节半月板损伤程度检出率中的比较分析[J]．临床研究，2018，26(08)：129-130.
[4]	赵辉. DR、CT与MRI对老年膝关节骨性关节炎的诊断价值分析[J]．中外医学研究，2018，(20)：55-57.
[5]	谢平金，柴生颋．膝骨性关节炎X线片观测指标及其应用进展[J]．中国中医骨伤科杂志，2017，(3)：72-76.
[6]	阮培灿. 探讨早期KOA患者髌周疼痛与髌股关节结构紊乱的相关性[D]．广州中医药大学，2014.
[7]	Block JA, Shakoor N．Lower limb osteoarthritis: biomechanical alterations and implications for therapy[J]．Curr Opin Rheumatol, 2010, 22(5)：544-550.
[8]	夏亚一，孙正义，黑坂昌弘，等．下肢力学轴线与膝关节骨关节炎的关系[J]．中国药物与临床，2002，2(1): 30-32.
[9]	高兴华，刘永轶，王敏聪，等．膝关节置换术后皮肤麻痹的解剖基础及相关临床研究[J]．中国临床解剖学杂志，2016，34(2)：121-125.
[10]	王继恒．负重位全下肢摄片技巧及影响因素[J]．双足与保健，2018，27(10)：83＋85.
[12]	王强，苟海昕，曹月龙，等．膝骨关节炎X线分级与疼痛程度的相关性分析[J]．中国中医骨伤科杂志，2015，23(6)：18-21.
[13]	Chan KK，Sit RW，Wu RW，et al. Clinical，radiological and ultrasonograpfyic findings related to knee pain in osteoarthritis [J]. Plos One，2014，9(3)：e92901.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092901.
[14]	Pal S，Besier TF，Draper CE，et al. Patellar tilt correlates with vastuslateralis: vastus medialis activation ratio in maltracking patellofemoralpain patients[J]. J Orthop Res，2012，30(6): 927-933.
[15]	姜益常，宋寒冰，李远峰，等. 针刀松解法治疗髌骨半脱位对髌骨指数改变的临床观察[J]．中医药学报，2015，43(6)：77-78.

组别	例数	外侧髌股角	髌股倾斜角	髌股指数	髌股协调角	股骨滑车角
VAS评分≥ 5分	48	19.02±4.81	－22.01±10.99	1.85±2.73	－4.86±5.34	115.14±12.24
VAS评分<5分	42	17.18±4.97	－21.60±11.08	0.73±0.11	－4.07±5.68	114.06±14.18
t值	－	1.12	1.08	2.05	1.05	0.93
P值	－	>0.05	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05

组别	例数	外侧髌股角	髌股倾斜角	髌股指数	髌股协调角	股骨滑车角
VAS评分≥ 5分	48	19.02±4.81	－22.01±10.99	1.85±2.73	－4.86±5.34	115.14±12.24
VAS评分<5分	42	17.18±4.97	－21.60±11.08	0.73±0.11	－4.07±5.68	114.06±14.18
t值	－	1.12	1.08	2.05	1.05	0.93
P值	－	>0.05	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05

	疼痛评分	回归系数	标准误	Wald值	P值	OR	95%置信区间
	外侧髌股角	－0.071	116.226	0.000	0.896	0.931	(0.012，0.954)
	髌股倾斜角	0.032	39.907	0.000	0.999	1.033	(0.010，0.923)
轻度	髌股指数	0.294	0.033	79.132	<0.05	1.342	(7.963，19.631)
	髌股协调角	0.021	25.507	0.000	0.919	1.022	(0.014，0.896)
	股骨滑车角	－2.779	98.974	0.001	0.978	0.062	(0.011，0.927)
	外侧髌股角	0.122	116.226	0.000	0.999	1.130	(0.009，0.816)
	髌股倾斜角	0.016	39.907	0.000	0.950	1.016	(0.0317，0.964)
中度	髌股指数	0.296	0.029	106.064	<0.05	1.345	(6.472，20.213)
	髌股协调角	－0.014	25.507	0.000	0.932	0.987	(0.0147，1.054)
	股骨滑车角	－1.883	98.970	0.000	0.985	0.152	(0.0131，0.946)
	外侧髌股角	－0.043	116.226	0.004	0.084	0.958	(0.0258，0.567)
	髌股倾斜角	0.010	39.907	0.021	0.072	1.010	(0.369，0.875)
重度	髌股指数	－1.970	98.971	0.000	0.984	0.139	(0.034，0.849)
	髌股协调角	－0.020	25.507	0.000	0.999	0.980	(0.045，0.843)
	股骨滑车角	0.327	0.000	0.010	0.275	1.387	(0.038，1.492)

	疼痛评分	回归系数	标准误	Wald值	P值	OR	95%置信区间
	外侧髌股角	－0.071	116.226	0.000	0.896	0.931	(0.012，0.954)
	髌股倾斜角	0.032	39.907	0.000	0.999	1.033	(0.010，0.923)
轻度	髌股指数	0.294	0.033	79.132	<0.05	1.342	(7.963，19.631)
	髌股协调角	0.021	25.507	0.000	0.919	1.022	(0.014，0.896)
	股骨滑车角	－2.779	98.974	0.001	0.978	0.062	(0.011，0.927)
	外侧髌股角	0.122	116.226	0.000	0.999	1.130	(0.009，0.816)
	髌股倾斜角	0.016	39.907	0.000	0.950	1.016	(0.0317，0.964)
中度	髌股指数	0.296	0.029	106.064	<0.05	1.345	(6.472，20.213)
	髌股协调角	－0.014	25.507	0.000	0.932	0.987	(0.0147，1.054)
	股骨滑车角	－1.883	98.970	0.000	0.985	0.152	(0.0131，0.946)
	外侧髌股角	－0.043	116.226	0.004	0.084	0.958	(0.0258，0.567)
	髌股倾斜角	0.010	39.907	0.021	0.072	1.010	(0.369，0.875)
重度	髌股指数	－1.970	98.971	0.000	0.984	0.139	(0.034，0.849)
	髌股协调角	－0.020	25.507	0.000	0.999	0.980	(0.045，0.843)
	股骨滑车角	0.327	0.000	0.010	0.275	1.387	(0.038，1.492)

[1]	Jiale Xie, Qi Li, Shengsheng Lu, Jinsong Jiang. Surgical treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis with coronal subluxation of tibiofemoral joint [J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 653-657.
[2]	Yalong Xu, Dong Gong, Xiaotao Chen. Research progress on advanced analgesia in total knee replacement surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 517-523.
[3]	Wenyan Song, Meijun Du, Jiali Chen, Bing Shi, Hanyao Huang. Research progress and prospective of biomaterial-based therapeutic approaches in pain management during the perioperative period of cleft lip and palate surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[4]	Yue Zhang. Diagnosis and treatment of neck pain caused by transient perivascular inflammation of the carotid artery [J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 336-339.
[5]	Yingyu Yi, Yaqin Zhu. Advance in orofacial pain research [J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 300-306.
[6]	Wei Du, Tuming Liao, Xiongcai Li, Gangqiang Guan, Shen He, Jiaqiao Wu, Herong Zhu. A randomized controlled trial of 2% lidocaine gel versus lubricant gel in female urodynamics [J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[7]	Yafei Yan, Xuesheng Fan, Jian Zhang, Yong Wu. Clinical effect of recurrent inguinal hernia treated by trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair [J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 552-556.
[8]	Kanghu Li, Jiwei Wang, Guangyuan Wang. Progress in prevention and treatment of postoperative complications of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair [J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[9]	Wenjuan Xu, Cuiyun Wu, Yan Xu, Chao Ni. Application of standardized humanistic care in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair [J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 456-460.
[10]	Shuying Xu, Wang Zhang, Ling Wang, Zhaofeng Jiang. Influence of individualized nursing on postoperative pain and comfort in patients with tension-free inguinal hernia repair [J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 461-465.
[11]	Qingcheng Song, Zhanle Zheng, Tianrui Wang, Yuchuan Wang, Kaixuan Zhang, Jing Na, Jiahao Yu, Sifan1 Yang, Jiuhong Song, Yingze Zhang. "Aging without Knee Aging":Comprehensive Exploration and Practice of Knee Health Management- [J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 10(06): 321-324.
[12]	Zhanle Zheng, Yuchuan Wang, Jiahao Wei, Qingcheng Song, Kaixuan Zhang, Jing Na, Tianrui Wang, Jiuhong Song, Yingze Zhang, Juan Wang. Knee protection requires “Knee osteoarthritis pendulum therapy” the clinical value of"Knee osteoar-thritis pendulum therapy" in Knee Osteoarthritis [J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 10(06): 325-330.
[13]	Pengfei Wang, Yingying Cheng, Haikang Zhao. Mechanism of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in improving neuropathic pain [J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(04): 230-234.
[14]	Qiaoling Wei, Yan Huang, Chang Zhao, Qingfeng Song, Zuyi Chen, Ying Huang, Chang Meng, Jing Huang. Construction and verification of moderate to severe pain risk prediction model after microwave ablation of liver cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[15]	Xiaowen Cai, Huijing Li, Jie Qiu, Yifan Yang, Suxian Wu, Yutong Lin, Qiuna He. Construction and verification of a pain risk prediction model for patients with liver cancer after TACE [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export