Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02): 203-208. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.02.011

Special Issue:

• Basic Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Biomechanical test of barbed memory alloy artificial wrist prosthesis

Xingbo Cai1, Junyu Yang1, Jing Ding1,(), Yongqing Xu1, Muguo Song1, Jinxing Ma1   

  1. 1. Kunming general hospital of the people's liberation army Department of orthopedic, Kunming 650000, China
  • Received:2017-06-06 Online:2018-04-01 Published:2018-04-01
  • Contact: Jing Ding
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ding Jing, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

objective To evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of Ni-ti barb wrist prosthesis.

Methods

Six cases of normal human fresh forearm were collected (provided by department of anatomy, Southern Medical University). Inclusion criteria: fresh frozen adult forearm; the wrists were free to move. Exclusion criteria: fracture, joint dislocation or bone tumor on the adult forears. In the Cortex motion capture system, the range of motion (ROM) of wrist prosthesis was compared in flexion, extension, ulnar deviation, and radial deviation before and after total wrist arthroplasty (TWA). The data were analysed by paired t test. In the Elector Force high precision biological material test system, the prostheses were loaded with an increasing pull-out force 2 N per second, until the prosthesis displacement was more than 2 mm. The prosthesis loosening pull-out force at the moment was recorded. Independent sample t test was used to compare the pull-out force of the radial component and wrist component .

Results

ROM of wrist prosthesis in extension, ulnar deviation, and radial deviation showed no statistical difference (P>0.05) before and after TWA. For preoperative maximum flexion was (75.0±3.5) °, postoperative maximum flexion was (52.6±3.2) °, which showed significant difference (t=14.69, P<0.05). The pull-out force of radius prosthesis was (164±15) N, and the pull-out force of metacarpal prosthesis was (512±38) N, which was statistically different( t=-20.859, P< 0.05) .

Conclusion

Ni-ti barb wrist prosthesis can basically meet ROM and pull-out resistance of the daily biomechanics demands, which has some potential value of clinical application.

Key words: Wrist joint, Biomechanical phenomena, Prostheses and implants, Arthroplasty, Alloys

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-83189181,020-83062381 E-mail: cjojs1@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd